Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 3[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 3, 2018.

Livres (political party)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 11#Livres (political party)

Draft:List of generation III Pokemon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 03:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from Draft to mainspace AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral on this one since it is a title match. I mean, having a redirect in the "Draft:" namespace can be seen as somewhat helpful since it will redirect the reader/editor to the existing article to edit/change/read, but since the redirect doesn't contain any history of an actual draft and isn't a {{R from move}} where the current article was previously, I'm not sure. Steel1943 (talk) 18:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The creator of this redirect, Assoc, is globally locked across all Wikimedia projects, and I'm not sure why. But, if for that reason someone believes that redirect qualifies for some sort of speedy deletion criteria, they will not receive any opposition from me. Steel1943 (talk) 18:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Erm... delete. The page history contains some weird edits by the creator which seem to be(???) insinuating that it was the result of a move. But it was not the result of a move. So now I'm really confused. Regardless, the page is basically orphaned and not old enough for regular users to have found it off-wiki, so I don't think it's doing anything useful. --NYKevin 03:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete For maintenance purposes.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Addiction to World of Warcraft[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Video game addiction. Looks like the section in the original target got removed. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addiction no longer mentioned in the target article, misleading redirect. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:22, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WoWarcraft[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an extremely strange way to write the title, and an implausible redirect. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

World of Warcraft items and equipment[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gameplay of World of Warcraft. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect, as the article does not describe any items or equipment. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

World of warcraft mounts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Races and factions of Warcraft. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no listing of any mounts in the target article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Classes in world of warcraft[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gameplay of World of Warcraft#Characters. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The target article only gives a few examples of classes and is far from any kind of serious list as this redirect might imply. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

World of warcraft language[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. While the nomination rationale is somewhat minimal, a search doesn't bring up any worthwhile candidates. More to the point, the section this was pointed to was removed a decade ago. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overly vague and confusing redirect, unclear whether it refers to ingame languages or language options. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

World of warcrack[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Term is not mentioned in the article and is just unencyclopedic gamer slang. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

War of worldcraft[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 11#War of worldcraft

Redirects to List of current UFC fighters[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 10#Redirects to List of current UFC fighters

Super Mario Bros. 2 for Super Players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs). -- Tavix (talk) 03:32, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unless this is an English translation of the Japanese title (which Durant seem to be the case), this title is not used in any references I could find. For that reason, the title is confusing since some readers may be attempting to locate a subject related to Super Mario Bros. 2, a different game than the target. Steel1943 (talk) 21:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The closet thing I can think of is in the Game Boy Color port of the oringsl Super Mario Bros also conatained the second game as Super Mario Bros. for Super Players minus the 2. If this is kept it should redirect to Super Mario Bros.#Super Mario Bros. Deluxe though since that version of the game did not include the two I’m not sure it’s necessary.--64.229.165.48 (talk) 23:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Apparently, this is a real game mode that exists within the overall Mario Bros series (with there being some more information here). At the same time, this is a minor detail that I believe isn't currently mentioned on Wikipedia anywhere. It's a trivia item, really. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:WAR (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Target is not a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 00:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete mostly because [1] doesn't appear to be worth saving. --NYKevin 04:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This just doesn't seem useful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_3&oldid=1037876552"