Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 16, 2018.

Greek Orthodox Ochrid Archbishopric[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#Greek Orthodox Ochrid Archbishopric

Tertiary constraint[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Killiondude (talk) 07:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a redirect to Primary constraint, but that article does not use this term (neither as a synonym nor as a related idea being discussed). Instead, the "primary" article says there are only primary and secondary, with secondary defined as anything that is not primary, therefore there is no topic-space for any other *ary. The only inbound link is a SEEALSO of Constraint (classical mechanics) as an un-annotated list list of all *ary. DMacks (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep mentions and explains that some authors use the terminology of tertiary constraint. I don't really understand it, but it does explain what it is, so it seems reasonable. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Quaternary constraint[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:10, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a redirect to Primary constraint, but that article does not use this term (neither as a synonym nor as a related idea being discussed). Instead, the "primary" article says there are only primary and secondary, with secondary defined as anything that is not primary, therefore there is no topic-space for any other *ary. The only inbound link is a SEEALSO of Constraint (classical mechanics) as an un-annotated list list of all *ary. DMacks (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • No, it does discuss it. Look further down. It's parenthetical and attributed to "a few authors".
    On the other hand, the first hit for "quaternary constraint" in double quotes is something from enzymatic chemistry that to my naive eyes appears unrelated (at least, the word "Lagrangian" does not seem to appear, if Ctrl+F can be trusted in a PDF file). So maybe delete per WP:XY? --Trovatore (talk) 11:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to keep these two together
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of designers of the Final Fantasy series[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#List of designers of the Final Fantasy series

St. Joseph's High School, Mysore[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#St. Joseph's High School, Mysore

Slash Puppet[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. --BDD (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted because there's a draft that can't be moved due to having the same name (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Slash_Puppet) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charbelfakhoury (talk • contribs) 20:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted. Can be closed Legacypac (talk) 11:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wacky (behavior)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created set of (behavior) synonym redirects that go against WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Is this really necessary? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1) The whole purpose of having a 'wacky...' redirect was to have wacky categorized under Category:Pejorative terms for people because Wikipedia has at least one article (even if it is a disambiguation page) starting with the word wacky. If the redirect is deleted, then perhaps we should also delete the entire category. Alternatively, place this categorization elsewhere. I had originally placed it in Wacky, a disambiguation page, but that was reverted. If we keep the category, and have any page beginning with wacky, then we should populate that category methodically - or should we?. So which is more important - having a useful category (which has dictionary-like semantics), or being strict about WP:NOTDICTIONARY? Perhaps we need additional guidelines? 2) On a related note, there are many one word articles that are either disambiguation pages to articles with that word as a label, e.g., the name of a song, (rather than that word as a concept); or alternatively the most popular label of that word. Both of these cases limit effective categorization of the concept behind the word, because the concept article has not yet been written, even though the categories do exist. Its really a problem of coherence & completeness across Wikipedia articles & categories. I am a huge fan of coherence and completeness as I think these trump some guidelines (WP:Ignore all rules). I recommend keep: and/or update guidelines. Dpleibovitz (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. An encyclopedia is not a thesaurus, but either way, the two words are not closely enough related for one to redirect to the other. Steel1943 (talk) 03:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Repatriation Hospital in Hollywood[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#Repatriation Hospital in Hollywood

Ty Roberts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of term in target article including titles of its sources; no indication of usefulness of redirect. (Googling "Ty Roberts" football doesn't list him on first page) PamD 19:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - can't find any evidence this is a valid redirect. GiantSnowman 17:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dorchester Atheneum[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#Dorchester Atheneum

Natan de Breslov[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#Natan de Breslov

Kerala State Television Award for Best Dubbing Artist[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#Kerala State Television Award for Best Dubbing Artist

2018 TCR BeNeLux Touring Car Championship[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#2018 TCR BeNeLux Touring Car Championship

Investec South African Women's Open[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Killiondude (talk) 07:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this term in article; no indication of usefulness of this redirect. If sponsor's name is significant the sponsored title should be included in the article. PamD 18:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If it isn't mentioned, sourced, in the article (or isn't an obvious variant of a term which is in the article, eg different capitals, shorter or fuller version, etc), how do we know it's a valid redirect? PamD 14:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The male equivalent South African Open (golf) shows the various names for the tournament in the table of results - a nice elegant solution. Please will someone who knows about the topic do the same for the women's tournament? PamD 14:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hill People's Union[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close; converted to article. --BDD (talk) 21:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this term in article; no indication of usefulness of this redirect. PamD 18:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete- per edit history, a third-party editor redirected the unnotable political party to the headquarters of the party apparently because they did not know where else to redirect it. That is not a good reason. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural close drafted a stub. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw nomination now that there's an article, not a redirect at the title. Thanks. PamD 14:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mon Foring[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by RHaworth. --BDD (talk) 20:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this term in article; no indication of usefulness of this redirect. PamD 18:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to draft-space without leaving behind a redirect, and restore this revision. This film has not yet started filming, but according to the second source cited it will begin in April. Assuming that happens and garners more coverage to meet WP:NFILM it could return as an article then. In the meantime, redirecting a film to one of its participants is not an appropriate way of addressing notability concerns. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw Have reverted this article to how it stood before being incorrectly converted to a redirect (sorry, I should have spotted that before bringing it here - was early days in my NPP-ing of redirects). If anyone now wants to propose it for PROD or AfD, go ahead, but converting to a redirect was not the way to dispose of it. PamD 09:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shopno Bari[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. --BDD (talk) 20:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this term in article; no indication of usefulness of this redirect. PamD 18:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore the article and expand, as news coverage (see Google News for স্বপ্নবাড়ি) suggests the film is notable. Redirecting a film to a single actress is not the proper way of resolving notability concerns, regardless of whether the film is mentioned at any one of its participants' articles. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 04:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw, as for previous. Have reverted this article to how it stood before being incorrectly converted to a redirect (sorry, I should have spotted that before bringing it here - was early days in my NPP-ing of redirects). If anyone now wants to propose it for PROD or AfD, go ahead, but converting to a redirect was not the way to dispose of it. PamD 09:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Paramount Network Sports[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted. Amortias (T)(C) 21:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this term in article; no indication of usefulness of this redirect. No Sports section in target page. PamD 18:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I thought "Spike Sports" would naturally be rebranded to this title after the branding change; no signs of that happened on-air (they just use "(fighting circuit) on Paramount Network"), so a db-author of this redirect is fine. Nate • (chatter) 19:46, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spike Sports[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#Spike Sports

Lady xorn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. --BDD (talk) 20:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this term in article; no indication of usefulness of this redirect. Target Xorn article describes two male characters. PamD 18:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is valid, because Lady Xorn was a female incarnation of the character. Such re-imaginings of characters is routine in comics. (In a recent storyline involving alternate timelines, to name another example, readers were treated to a black female Captain America.) Readers looking for info on her should be directed to the character's main, or parent incarnation. Nightscream (talk) 22:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I have no opinion on the usefulness of the redirect, but I've aimed it at the specific section of Xorn that discusses her. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • And now that she gets a mention there by name (didn't before) I'm happy to Withdraw - it's now a valid and useful-looking redirect. Have also created Lady Xorn, redirecting to same place. Thanks. PamD 14:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Road FC Featherwegiht Champions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely typo - have created correctly spelled version PamD 18:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Best novels ever[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading since all novels are books (traditionally pre-digital age), but not all books are novels. Steel1943 (talk) 14:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Monster rabbit[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:04, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is vague and could refer to more than just the rabbit in Donnie Darko. In fact, when I see this phrase, I think of the subject of Rabbit of Caerbannog. Steel1943 (talk) 14:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Even if you assume that no other monster rabbits exist, it doesn't even accurately describe the film character. —Xezbeth (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep The article contains "monstrous rabbit" and the redirect is useful for people wondering what movie the monster rabbit came from. Bod (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    As I stated in my nomination statement, there are multiple bunnies (mainly fictional) that could be considered a "monster". The redirect isn't even an actual name of the subject in Donnie Darko. In the redirect's present state, it is akin to a WP:NOTWIKIA violation where such a redirect used in this manner would only belong on a Donnie Darko wiki; forwarding readers to an one example of an ambiguous term is unhelpful in an encyclopedia. Steel1943 (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dark Cloud 3[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#Dark Cloud 3

Stinky monkey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling and target considering that "Sticky" is not a likely misspelling of "Stinky", and "Monkey" is not short for "Monkeyflower" and could cause confusion. Steel1943 (talk) 13:58, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I don't see any likelihood that somebody will leave "flower" off of "monkeyflower". Mimulus/Diplacus mephiticus has "skunky monkeyflower" and "foul odor monkeyflower" as vernacular names, and I've found one source that calls it "stinky monkeyflower". There's a tattoo shop in Massachusetts named "Stinky Monkey" and various other uses out there; but none of that seems notable. Plantdrew (talk) 20:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unlikely search term and is not a real common name. Pagliaccious (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as obscure synonyms at best --Lenticel (talk) 00:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

A Monster[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:04, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is vague. It could even be used to refer to Monster. However, delete as unlikely for either target per WP:NOTLYRICS for the first and the use of "A" for the other. Steel1943 (talk) 13:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a possible misspelling for someone who thinks the lyrics use a different article. Notice the redirect has Monster with a capital letter. Bod (talk) 04:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. If the name of the song is "The Monster" it really doesn't need a redirect at "A Monster." Mention of capitalisation is rather a mute point as searches do not distinquish (if it did a search for 'THE MONSTER' wouldn't have any results, would it?). If the redirect were to remain, it should point to one of the more significant uses, Monster or Monster (disambiguation). --Richhoncho (talk) 10:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment actually the capitalization matters on at least one search page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=a+monster&title=Special:Search&profile=default&fulltext=1&searchToken=bnvoz46tv6n855lwvzu4djzh3. Bod (talk) 22:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stink bug australia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term PamD 09:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kunjali Marakkar (2014 film)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 25#Kunjali Marakkar (2014 film)

Monsters and imaginary beasts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:04, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure it's a useful redirect, but if it is, perhaps legendary creature is a better target. This could also be an WP:XY situation. -- Tavix (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Maybe this came from the Harry Potter movie "Fantastic Beasts...."? Bod (talk) 04:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Feels XY to me. --BDD (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Siedem brudne słowa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. -- Tavix (talk) 03:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator, and because this phrasing appears to be a Wikipedia-only invention. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 08:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Waiting for Sugar Man[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Killiondude (talk) 07:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect doesn't seem to be an alternative name or common misnomer for its target. Steel1943 (talk) 03:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Butt rash[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not finding any evidence of this being an alternative term for rashes caused by diapers that are exclusive to babies. That, and adults can have rashes on their buttocks as well, and they aren't always caused by diapers. But, then again, there is also a chance that a baby could have a rash on its buttocks not caused by a diaper as well. Steel1943 (talk) 03:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete just reading this makes me itch. Legacypac (talk) 06:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is the best redirect for the common term "butt rash" and it is not "infant diaper dermatitis". It even says in the article that a diaper does not have to be used. Bod (talk) 04:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    As I stared above, since the redirect is ambiguous and could refer to more than just its current target, redirecting readers to this specific article is actually unhelpful. Best to delete this redirect so that Wikipedia's search function can do its job. Steel1943 (talk) 06:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Toothpaste list[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Killiondude (talk) 07:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect isn't exclusive to brands of toothpaste. It could also refer to the types of toothpaste mentioned at Toothpaste#History. Steel1943 (talk) 00:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as most obvious redirect. Bod (talk) 04:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I must disagree, given that the redirect is ambiguous. "Types" does not exclusively mean "brands" in regards to types of toothpaste. Steel1943 (talk) 06:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I don't know likely a search term this is, but I do think that's probably what they'd be looking for. --BDD (talk) 20:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects to Insult[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These are examples of insults, but are not identified at the target. WP:NOTDIC. Steel1943 (talk) 00:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per the PROD statement by User:PamD which I endorse "The encyclopedia doesn't need to include every insult from every culture." Legacypac (talk) 00:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Legacypac (talk) 00:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete All and the insult a couple sections down too. We might want to SALT too as these would be good terms to redirect to any subject one does not like as vandalism. Legacypac (talk) 00:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

No money no family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTLYRICS. Steel1943 (talk) 00:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Boiled beans[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 23#Boiled beans

Shit dick[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per similar consensus at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 26#Redirects to Profanity. Steel1943 (talk) 00:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete pointless. Legacypac (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Target doesn't mention "dick" or any of its synonyms or hypernyms. Impossible to discern, from this string of random words, what exactly someone might be trying to find. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Enchilada sauce[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 23#Enchilada sauce

Mexican rice[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 23#Mexican rice

Now we're dancing on a fine line[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 23#Now we're dancing on a fine line

I'm friends with the monster[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 23#I'm friends with the monster

Death fuck[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 23#Death fuck

Cutie Pie Snack Pies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Steel1943 (talk) 00:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Turmp[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an implausible misspelling. Steel1943 (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or should I say Deltee Legacypac (talk) 00:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as recently fashioned typo, not plausible or notable. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Non-useful typo. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 15:29, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unlikely misspelling --Lenticel (talk) 00:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral - I personally don't care either way, but if it stayed, it would be fine. It's a plausible typo - it's easy to accidentally press one key slightly before another. There's not much of a reason to delete this - the deletion discussion will take up MORE SPACE on Wikipedia than the redirect itself. If it's able to help even one person, I'd be kinda down. Paintspot Infez (talk) 02:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Turban family[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 23#Turban family

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_16&oldid=1037876545"