Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 4[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 4, 2018.

Czech mustard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed, BDD's terrible humor aside. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The word "Czech" is not present in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 19:50, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • N.b., Czech cuisine mentions a few dishes that include mustard, but gives no indication of a specific variety that would be called this. Given the country's history, I also checked Slovak cuisine, which has no mention of mustard at all. Central European cuisine mostly just links out to individual countries' cuisine articles. Mustering (ahem) what little foreign language skills I have, I checked de:Senf, whose only mention of the Czech Republic is about the use of a certain German mustard used there. --BDD (talk) 21:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Saul Paul[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn and retargeted to Paul the Apostle. -- Tavix (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No results at all stating Sean Paul went/goes by "Saul Paul", "Saul Paul" seems to be some sort of non-notable singer but as far as I can see is unrelated to Sean, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Paul the Apostle who was known as both "Saul" and "Paul". I can see someone trying this that knows both names are ambiguous and not knowing how else to try to find that Paul. -- Tavix (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah that explains why he comes up when searching "Saul Paul" - Agreed retargetting seems a better idea, No objections Tavix if you want to close and retarget - Shan't attempt myself as I'd screw it up, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I can do that for you. I recommend giving WP:XFDC a try if you haven't already; it makes closing XfDs very easy and almost impossible to screw up! -- Tavix (talk) 20:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Post close comment - Thanks so much!, Where I'm so used to the old RFD closes I seem to forget that that tool works here too now, Anyway thanks Tavix, –Davey2010Talk 22:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Move Your Body(Sean Paul Song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Useless redirect - Move Your Body (Sean Paul Song) currently exists, The creator had created this redirect after "Move Your Body (Sean Paul Song)" so I assume it was accidental ?, No idea but anyway not needed, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bend on a Wire[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not in article. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Appears to be the former/alternate title[1]. KingAndGod 13:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not seeing any searches show up for this term. If it was an alternative title, it certainly didn't get any news coverage or production notes coverage by any RS'es. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nonchalanto[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not found in article. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 11:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Appears to be a character in the episode[2]. KingAndGod 13:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Character not notable enough to be listed in the summary, even in the guest star list, should there be one. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Club polideportivo[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 13#Club polideportivo

Theory and fact[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 13#Theory and fact

Deportivos[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Deportivo. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:30, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FORRED. Spanish. Steel1943 (talk) 18:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Flavors lisp[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Flavors (programming language). (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear what this redirect refers to, considering that "lisp" is not mentioned in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Architectural steel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear how this term (the redirect) refers to its target. The precise use of "architectural" is unclear, and could vaguely refer to Steel itself. Steel1943 (talk) 18:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It's a term that would be used to contrast with structural steel, but there's nothing to actually say about it. Certainly not in the target article. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Crossbeam[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Beam (structure). ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:06, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete as term does not appear in target article. Kohlscheid (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ongoing[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:13, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect could also be considered to mean "In progress", which is currently a redirect to Work in process. Steel1943 (talk) 16:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as WP:COMMONWORD AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:35, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think this is an important page, because people may use this term (wrongly) in template paramters that auto-link, for example {{{construction started}}} and {{{construction finished}}}. Perhaps a wiktionary link would be better. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete I don't really understand Rich's argument, but this is just a common word, no need to redirect. Don't think wiktionary soft redirect is helpful either. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Time and date[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Date and time notation. -- Tavix (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:XY. The alternative subject on this redirect is Calendar date, which is its own article/subject. Steel1943 (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or Remove - take your pick Legacypac (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I agree that the redirect is not particularly useful. It is a leftover from a page move and has been left due to the many incoming links (internal and external) to the original article. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Date and time notation which discusses these topics together and describes how they are written. Mind you, the article needs work, but it seems to me to be what people are looking for. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:51, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a good solution to me. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Orphan blue[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed. -- Tavix (talk) 17:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Steel1943 (talk) 14:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Slate blue[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 13#Slate blue

List of members of the National People's Congress[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 15#List of members of the National People's Congress

Accelerated freeze drying[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear what specific subject this redirect refers to as the word "accelerate" and variants are not present in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cemical Explosion[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:07, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling. On a related note, as of the time of this nomination, Cemical doesn't exist. Steel1943 (talk) 12:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ZSYE[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The connection between the redirect and its target is unclear. The redirect is not mentioned in the target article, and results on third-party search engines seem to return no results for any connection between the redirect and the target. Steel1943 (talk) 12:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • zsye (ZSYE) is the ISO 15924 script code for emoticons and emoji symbols. Nicole Sharp (talk) 12:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • From my understanding, the precedence for using ISO code-related redirects is exclusive to using an "ISO" prefix, such as ISO 15924:ZSYE or ISO 15924:Zsye. (Hmm, the latter exists.) I still question the usefulness of this without the "ISO" prefix, so I'll leave this nomination up for the time being. Steel1943 (talk) 12:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Many other ISO language and script codes have their own redirects. You either have to keep them all or delete them all for consistency. It is much easier for people looking up ISO 15924 codes though if they can just type in the code into search without needing to prefix, for those code names that are not taken by another article already (e.g. Arab vs. ARAB). Nicole Sharp (talk) 12:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have updated the article for emoji to include the ISO 15924 code. The script code is important since multilingual font families will sometimes include a separate font for the zsye script. For use in HTML and CSS, the capitalization is flexible and can be spelled Zsye (Zsye) or zsye (ZSYE). Nicole Sharp (talk) 12:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pictogram for mobile phones[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like both an unlikely search term, and not properly specific to refer to its target, as well as too specific to refer to Pictogram. Steel1943 (talk) 12:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Short talk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:39, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The connection between the redirect and the target is unclear. Perbthird party search engines, the term "short talk" refers to a "long abstract", and it's not clear what that means either. Steel1943 (talk) 11:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete clearly not the target. A "short talk" is a type of public address. Legacypac (talk) 18:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete sounds like a neologism. [3] as almost all other news articles discuss giving a speech that is short. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (or dab to other senses) unless new info comes to light - this looks like a misunderstanding - to be "short" with someone is to be curt, and potentially rude, but does not combine with "talk" in this sense in any variety of English I am familar with. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blue Words[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The connection between the redirect and its target is unclear. I'm also not finding any clear connections on third party search engines either. Steel1943 (talk) 11:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blue words is a circumlocution for profane language, blue is in the sense of blue laws and blue jokes. There may be other meanings to be considered. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 07:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete as obscure synonym at best. I wanted to soft retarget to wiktionary but they don't have an entry. --Lenticel (talk) 02:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Angest[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 13#Angest

Teenage angst[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Teenage Angst. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The word "teen" or variants is nowhere in the target article. (However, this redirect is a {{R with history}} that looks like it was subject to a WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT in December 2005.) Steel1943 (talk) 11:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because the redirect has so much history; I also tagged it {{R with possibilities}}. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The amount of history this redirect may have in no way assesses its usefulness as a redirect search term. In fact, considering that this redirect was WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT-ed over 12 years ago, I'd argue that the {{R with possibilities}} tag placed on this redirect is invalid, and a WP:REDLINK deletion may be more applicable. At the best, this content at this redirect should be restored and then the article sent to WP:AFD; the history of this redirect may be eligible for some WP:TNT. Steel1943 (talk) 17:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hinduism in the Isle of Man[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No hindus mentioned at target. We have been deleting these hinduism redirects as misleading. Legacypac (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-per nom — FR+ 08:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It is misleading to have a redirect suggesting the target has information on Hinduism in this country when there is none. -- Tavix (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hinduism in Jersey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of any hindus here. We have been deleting these hindu redirects that lead to no information. Legacypac (talk) 09:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It is misleading to have a redirect suggesting the target has information on Hinduism in this country when there is none. -- Tavix (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hinduism in Guernsey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is not even any info about ANY religion on this page. Anyone following the redirect is going to be disappointed Legacypac (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It is misleading to have a redirect suggesting the target has information on Hinduism in this country when there is none. -- Tavix (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hinduism in South Ossetia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another Hinduism redirect to South Ossetia#Demographics where you will find nothing about hindus - and likely never will given the situation in this tiny quasi country. Legacypac (talk) 08:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It is misleading to have a redirect suggesting the target has information on Hinduism in this country when there is none. -- Tavix (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hinduism in San Marino[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect. No mention of any hindus in the county here so the reader will be disappointed. I doubt there are any hindus in this tiny country anyway so it is an invalid topic. We have a significant precedent for deleting similar hinduism redirects to various non hindu containing places. Legacypac (talk) 08:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It is misleading to have a redirect suggesting the target has information on Hinduism in this country when there is none. -- Tavix (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Soumyabrata Gupta[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as WP:G7 since both creator of article and creator of redirect request deletion. SoWhy 08:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible and meritless redirect.No value in creating redirects from the name of tens of lacs of journalist(s) who have written for the thousands of newspapers, that exist in the world.that's a non-sensical application of ATD. ~ Winged BladesGodric 05:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hours that redirect to Time[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:37, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how/why these are helpful, considering that their respective times aren't described in detail in the target article. In addition, other times such as 1:01, 1:02 ... don't exist. Steel1943 (talk) 02:23, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment 24-hour clock, maybe? It has a brief table explaining all of these (whether the reader meant them as 12-hour or 24-hour times), and more generally has some discussion on the history of dividing time into hours. Can't find anything else to which these terms could refer, it's all WP:PTMs or not-quite-matches like 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. (disambiguations), 12:00 a.m. – 1:00 a.m. (an episode of 24), UTC+02:00 and UTC−02:00 (time zones), etc. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 05:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete These redirects were created en masse in November 2017, and haven't been used in any useful links. 24-hour clock would be more for searches for "01:00" or "15:00" and hours with a leading zero for hours under 10. If the redirects mentioned am or pm then 12-hour clock would be more appropriate. Time, Clock, Hour seem too vague but at least 12-hour and 24-hour clock articles show this kind of notation. And sending them off to Date and time notation would be a surprise. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete useless and pointless. If you know how to ise a clock you don't need the redirect. Legacypac (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I agree with the reasons above. Sxg169 (talk) 11:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Numbers And Numerals[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Numeral system. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:13, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:XY; Numeral is not a redirect towards Number, and thus represents different subjects. Steel1943 (talk) 02:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Numeral system, as this article explains the (somewhat intricate) relationship between the two concepts. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 08:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  • Retarget per Rich Farmbrough. feminist (talk) 02:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Grand Prix du Disque Aword[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 13#Grand Prix du Disque Aword

Danielle Sellers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Do we really have redirects from reality show contestants to the reality show on which they competed? VERY unlikely search term. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Only if they are likely to be linked by other articles. Looking at the current links, it's either talk pages or user space. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_4&oldid=1036305484"