Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 14, 2017.

Judges[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Judge (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that the book is the primary topic of the term, which is the plural of the common noun, judge. I would retarget this to Judge (disambiguation). bd2412 T 22:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Deccan[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 27#Deccan

Prochoice[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Abortion-rights movements. -- Tavix (talk) 23:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this term specific to the US or something? feminist 13:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've boldly retargeted these entries to Abortion-rights movements and also added the term pro-choice movement in bold at the lead sentence as with pro-life movement. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - 'Prochoice', crunched all into one word, seems to be associated more specifically with the National Abortion Federation to me as it administers prochoice.org. I agree that otherwise the term should go to the 'abortion-rights movements page. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Unless the search term suggests a reader is looking for a website, I wouldn't want Prochoice to point there. --BDD (talk) 18:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jennifer Kaeshagen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Already CSD'ed by RHaworth as a redirect to a deleted page Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 17:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to an article about a blog (currently the subject of an RfD – Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Stringer) that the person is the editor of. Only one other main-space article besides the article it redirects to links to it. Kb.au (talk) 12:03, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Stringer has been deleted, so Kaeshagen's redirect can be deleted as she has no other notability. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Public transit in the United States[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Public transportation in the United States. -- Tavix (talk) 20:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This should probably redirect to Public transportation in the United States. Nopetro retargeted the redirect at Public transportation in the United States (before my moves), but never did the same thing with the "transit" redirect. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy retarget Simple, shouldn't be controversial. --BDD (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, speedy'd. -- Beland (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rigel 7[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget.
(non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These similar redirects point to different targets. I suggest disambiguating as there is also a planet called Rigel 7 in The Simpsons (see Kang and Kodos). 165.91.12.186 (talk) 02:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget Rigel VII to Rigel in fiction, which refers to both Star Trek and The Simpsons, but please clean up the bolding on that page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Rigel in fiction per AngusWOOF. That's where readers will find what they are looking for. bd2412 T 02:46, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Burah[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 24#Burah

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_14&oldid=1037918515"