Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 October 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 29, 2016.

Fuck her right in the pussy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Snow Keep. [Consensus is to retain the redirect.] –Davey2010Talk 15:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

The redirect was recently a subject of a deletion review to achieve consensus on whether or not the article should be recreated. The discussion Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2016_October_9 closed with deletion endorsement and no recreation.

During the discussion, a few opinions were voiced that the redirect should be deleted as well. I feel that it's appropriate to revisit this redirect. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Valid target. The article does mention the video. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Discussed at source. Consensus at AfD and DRV was to keep the redirect to where information on this phenomenon exists. Deleting the redirect would just make it harder for those who want to learn about the topic. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There was a previous RfD discussion about this after the original AfD closed as delete. If I recall correctly, I think the consensus was to keep. Even now, this is a useful redirect that is discussed at the target. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 03:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - With the sources that exist about this topic, at the very least, a redirect is due.— Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I still maintain that FHRITP is a notable phenomenon, but I guess a redirect is going to be the best we're going to get. -- Tavix (talk) 04:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This redirect should aid in searches of this term, which is mentioned in some detail at the current target. Guy1890 (talk) 00:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep no argument for the deletion of the redirect was actually provided. Cavarrone 07:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mother-Daughter Exchange Club[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 10#Mother-Daughter Exchange Club

Paddy Henderson (charity organizner)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: for housekeeping - unlikely mispelling in the qualifier. NB Paddy Henderson (charity organizer) exists and is used. Narky Blert (talk) 19:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:PC Chris[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per criterion G6. Deleted by MER-C. Steel1943 (talk) 13:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unneccesary cross-namespace redirect. Result of an incorrect page move. The1337gamer (talk) 18:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brian kelly album redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by MBisanz as a result of the AFD. -- Tavix (talk) 22:14, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE this redirect and all others like it. All of this nonsense is pure self-promotion. These redirects were once articles where deletion was denied. They should have been deleted right away. Main deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pools of Light Sn00per (talk) 15:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Possible WP:TRAINWRECK. The AfD doesn't currently look like it will come to any strong conclusions, but it may do some of the work here for us.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I don't want to see anything happen here until the AfD goes through in appropriate fashion. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to allow time for the AfD to resolve
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the AfD was closed as delete, and the closing admin MBisanz seems to have deleted the redirects too. Pppery 16:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

!?![edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 8#!?!

Bliar[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget List of nicknames of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom. Deryck C. 09:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should this stay targeted to Tony Blair, or Blair as a mere misspelling? I should note that this is a rather popular, pejorative nickname for the former British PM, but I'm not quite sure now whether WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT applies here. (Hiliary redirects to Hilary, not Hillary Clinton, for example.) --Nevé–selbert 09:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Movetowiktionary[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. -- Tavix (talk) 03:01, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused making useful Redirects are not useful. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 20:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 05:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Godsy. Reasonable alternatives to the proper name of the template should be redirect whenever possible to reduce the knowledge thresholds required to use them. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Höyük[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget first three to Hüyük; default to delete last one given the strong consensus not to keep. Deryck C. 18:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORRED. Turkey may be a place with a lot of archaeological activity, but that doesn't mean any archaeological term has affinity for Turkish. --BDD (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Something's iffy here, User:BDD. tr:Höyük is linked over to en:Mound. But at the Turkish article, none of the other spellings are mentioned, but Hüyük, Öyük and Üyük are in the first sentence. Tell (archaelogy) does not link to tr:Höyük in its iw links, but that's probably because of something I have been grumbling about for years, that the Wikidata requires a 1:1 mapping. Actually tumulus would be a better IW link than mound, where it goes currently. But that's by the by-pass, I think these should all be deleted, but we need to do a bit of tidying up with the IW links, which is not really in the remit of RfD but I will do it. Si Trew (talk) 21:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I get the Huyuk and Hüyük. I've listed separately for the latter, because that's an R that doesn't need to be. Si Trew (talk) 21:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget Huyuk to Hüyük, Konya Hüyük as {{R from title without diacritics}}. No opinion on the others. Pppery 23:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I've taken as suggested by User:Pppery to reverse the redirect at Hüyük. Until that is sorted I don't think we can say more about that one. Si Trew (talk) 23:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget the first three to Hüyük. Höyük is an alternative name for Hüyük and the other two are simply {{R without diacritics}}. Delete Hoeyuek and Hueyuek. Eubot rather infamously applied the Germanic ö → oe standard to all languages, including those that don't use that transliteration. AFAICT, Turkish is not a language where that applies, and should be deleted as nonsense. -- Tavix (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget the first three, Delete the fourth, per Tavix. User: Andy M. Wang did the move over i.e. essentially reversal of the redirect, per my request: thanks for that, and sorry for asking initially at the wrong forum (i.e. here at RfD) but I wasn't sure what the right forum was. Si Trew (talk) 12:07, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I support retargeting the first three as suggested above. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget all to Hüyük. Some sources do use the last spelling as a transliteration. [1], [2] [3].---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Patar knight. BTW @Tavix, SimonTrew, Patar knight, and BDD:, while we're at it, it might be worth proposing a mass deletion for Eubot redirects, you know, kinda like the "Neelix case". - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @SimonTrew: You currently have both a "Delete all" and a "Retarget the first three, Delete the fourth" !vote active in this discussion.— Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - My instinct, although I don't have that strong of an opinion on the matter, is to just let people search. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:25, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 05:00, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_29&oldid=1088108543"