Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 8[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 8, 2016.

Crown Commonwealth League of Rights (disambiguation)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 17

Sid Vacant[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 12:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A character named "Sid Vacant" is also present in e.g. Lego Stunt Rally, wherefore the name shouldn't point to the GTA London article, but rather deleted. The redirect itself is linked from nowhere. Lordtobi (✉) 17:43, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not clear how notable this character is for the game. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - If anything, the Lego being appears to be more notable. I support deletion as well. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Allure Media[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Fairfax Media (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allure Media is a media company that runs Australia version of different websites such as Business Insider and Gizmodo. It shouldn't be primarily redirected to the Kotaku page. GamerPro64 15:24, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - This isn't right. At any rate, the organization may be notable enough to merit its own page, which having the text red helps us with. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

!?![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one exclamation point in the interrobang, not two. Pppery 16:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Maybe retarget to Exclamation mark#English, which explains that "The exclamation mark is sometimes used in conjunction with the question mark." I am sure that I have seen comic books that use "!?!" in sequence, though I can't find any examples online. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This phenomenon is explained at the current article (Writers using informal language may use several alternating question marks and exclamation marks for even more emphasis). -- Tavix (talk) 03:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 09:51, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Even if this perhaps isn't proper, it's still in use, as pointed out above. I lean to keeping things as is. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Honold[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was resolved. -- Tavix (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to expand this into a disambiguation page. There are other people with this surname such as Gottlob Honold and Rochus Honold a founder of Fuckin Wild. Hasn't edited since 2007 so I don't expect input. I would be bold and do this myself but I believe that would violate my ban on editing redirects. I am not able to notify the redirect cfeator @FateClub: directly due to his talk page being locked. I put a request on Talk:Honold to add the appropriate template, I am not able to do so since that would also violate the ban, so I am requesting someone else do that. Or, if anyone else agrees and wants to be bold and change it into a diambiguation page between Gottlob/Kurt/Rochus, that would be simpler. Ranze (talk) 06:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep (sort of). Just do it. The redirect can be overwritten; it doesn't need to be deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 10:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I went ahead and made a surname set index at Honold. The nominator couldn't do so due to being topic banned from editing redirects. I think this request could be speedily closed at this point. Plantdrew (talk) 16:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Art of listenning[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, vague redirect with a typo. I don't see how this is useful. -- Tavix (talk) 03:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

!BANG![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The short discussion here indicates that WP:SMALLDETAILS apply. Deryck C. 12:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These could also refer to DuckDuckGo#Bangs. Which title, if any, is the primary topic here? Pppery 01:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_8&oldid=1088108688"