Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 19[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 19, 2016.

Winnerland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is Czech Republic really known as Winnerland? This has redirected there since 2009. -- Tavix (talk) 20:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Quickie (divorce)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Divorce mill. JohnCD (talk) 11:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A quickie divorce isn't necessarily done in Mexico. Nevada, for example, is known for its loose divorce laws. And there's the rest of the world for that matter. Would Divorce mill be a better target? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per nom. Seems like the best target. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Divorce mill, which discusses "quickie divorces". -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Divorce mill per Notecardforfree --Lenticel (talk) 00:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokémon on the Wii[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 1#Pokémon on the Wii

Pokémon Online[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Pokémon TCG Online. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of these redirects are not mentioned in the target article. According to the deletion log of Pokémon Online, this title was apparently created then fully protected due to repeat content creation that went against the result of a WP:AFD discussion. For this reason, if these redirects are deleted, they may need to be WP:SALT-ed (but I'm not completely sure about that since it looks as though these issues last happened almost a decade ago.) Steel1943 (talk) 03:30, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokemon forms[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The words "forms" used in the redirect's context is target vague. For example, in the Pokémon franchise, it is unclear if this refers to the "species" (I stopped counting after 251, if this tells anyone anything), "types" (I think that amount is 18 "types" these days, but I stopped counting at 17), etc. Steel1943 (talk) 03:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:NOTWIKIA. "Form" is a variant within the species of pokemon. For example, a spiky eared Pichu is one of the forms of the species Pichu. Anyways, this Pokelore (hehehe) is a bit trivial and doesn't affect gameplay that much. --Lenticel (talk) 00:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this would be like Pokemon levels. No specific treatment in the article that makes this term different from any character / monster that has different forms. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - As stated above, the use of "forms" here is too vague. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokémon drawing[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is unclear what it refers to, and there is probably no good retargeting option for it. Steel1943 (talk) 03:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokémon Dollar[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the redirects is not identified or defined in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 03:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

O.J. Simpson tria[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely typo redirect: no "L" on the end, and version with "L" on the end exists. Nominating for discussion instead of speedy because the page has existed since 2006. Closeapple (talk) 02:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokemob[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling, borderline vandalism/slang. Steel1943 (talk) 02:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Implausible typo, not notable term. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as confusing synonym. This term pertains to a pokemon mod for minecraft --Lenticel (talk) 00:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokemaniac[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Term not described in the target article. Per the redirect's history as an article, the term is a possibly slang term that may not be notable. Steel1943 (talk) 02:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment According to Bulbapedia, Poke Maniac referred to a group of players in trenchcoats and later cosplayers, [1] of which Bill was one of the more notable ones. This could redirect to Bill if it is a nickname. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this is a class of trainers found in the game. However, they're not notable even in-game. --Lenticel (talk) 00:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Legendary Bird Pokemon[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 30#The Legendary Bird Pokemon

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_June_19&oldid=1088109468"