Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 29, 2016.

Political positions of Bill Clinton[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 10#Political positions of Bill Clinton

Pitt family[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 12#Pitt family

"Ain't I a stinker"[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 12#"Ain't I a stinker"

Bieber[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Discussion moved to Talk:Bieber (disambiguation)#Requested move 29 December 2016. Per WP:DABNAME, this is actually a move request, so thus this discussion is technically in the "wrong forum". (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 19:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not the only "Bieber" that exists. Retarget to Bieber (disambiguation). KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

سلوكيات المعلومات[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Information behavior is not particularly related to Arabic. Gorobay (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Elder Scrolls VI[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn/Retarget to The Elder Scrolls#Future. Not sure how I missed that. Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The 6th title of the series hasn't even been announced yet. (Alternatively, this could be retargeted to The Elder Scrolls Online, but that's probably erroneous since the series developer/publisher is probably waiting for its next non-MMO title to be released to call it the 6th [unlike the Final Fantasy series, specifically Final Fantasy XI and Final Fantasy XIV].) Steel1943 (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose WP:VG's custom search engine hits a good "The Elder Scrolls VI" 120,000 results; the game has been long-announced, and it was repeadetly stated that the game is being written on, but not in major development as of August (alike the Portal movie). Hence, this is just a redirect of something that has been confirmed to exist, and not a WP:CRYSTAL'd stub article. It would deffinetly be WP:CRYSTAL if we speculated if the development is now on, after the release of Skyrim Special Edition, but that is not concluded in the one-liner. Lordtobi (✉) 19:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jakarta earthquake[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 10#Jakarta earthquake

Malatya Inoenue Stadium[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Delete all. Not a Germanic umlaut but a letter in the Turkish alphabet. Si Trew (talk) 22:52, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 19:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all - feasible alternative spellings. GiantSnowman 20:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep at least the first two. This method of transliterating Malatya Inonu does seem to get some use. [1], [2]. Stadium is the obvious English, and "Stadi" would be the layman's transliteration from looking at the Turkish script. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the usages given above do not represent that thus transliterations are commonplace. I have a feeling that they are indeed transliterated by a computer program, most search results give Wikipedia mirrors, also, our article Turkish alphabet does not mention anything relevant. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I agree with Champion on this one. All instances of "Inoenue" were either mirrors, academic listings that seem to have gone through computer transliteration, or things that were transliterated through German. More pertinently, human-written references of "Inoenue" seem to exclusively refer to the university rather than the stadium. All said, I'm not convinced that this is actually a correct transliteration. Deryck C. 18:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2013 western Iran earthquake[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The encyclopedia does not contain any information on this non-notable event. Dawnseeker2000 22:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target. Rather vague, too. Si Trew (talk) 22:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment According to List of earthquakes in 2013 there were several quakes that hit Iran in that year.2013 Bushehr earthquake, which happened in April, is the only one that both has an article and could be described as being "western Iran" (a term which appears to have no formal definition). On 28 November there was an earthquake that struck "Iran" according to List of earthquakes in 2013#November and caused at least 7 fatalities. It does not have an article, but the USGS source has maps that put it in the same area as the April event. Thryduulf (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – The event in question occurred on November 24, 2013. It was without consequence, and if there were any effects to comment on, the USGS would have done so in the "Impacts" section of their web page on it. The section is omitted in this report because there were no effects. These types of events happen all the time. WP doesn't need to document them, especially in our list of earthquakes by year series. The bulk of that content is hollow and is not encyclopedic.
  • M 5.0 - 41km SSW of Sarpol-e Zahab, Iran
Dawnseeker2000 18:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • What's the delay on this? – This redirect was created for an event that is not notable. It occurred on November 24, 2013 in western Iran, a few miles from the Iraq border, and about 200 miles west-southwest of Tikrit. It's this event:
  • M 5.0 - 41km SSW of Sarpol-e Zahab, Iran
  • The event that Thryduulf mentioned, for which this redirect was not created, occurred on November 28. This event is notable (because of deaths, injuries, and damage) and occurred in adjacent to the Persian Gulf near Bushehr (which our article describes as being "in the south of the country"):
  • M 5.8 - 10km ENE of Borazjan, Iran
  • My intent with these deletion requests was for general housekeeping. I'm pretty astonished that there's resistance to that. There are many more deletions to take care of, but now I realize that it may be an uphill battle. I don't understand why tidying is so difficult. Dawnseeker2000 02:34, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Haemeenkatu[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Eubot) Not Germanic, Finnish. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yueksekova[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Eubot) Turkish, not Germanic. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The usual 'eubot treating every ü as German-u-with-umlaut, regardless of actual languages involved' nonsensical transliteration. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 21:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A one-man theory which has been rejected for use in courts, most of the edits around this topic are from the proponent of the theory. Guy (Help!) 00:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I WP:BOLDly merged these together due to the same nomination statement being used for both. Steel1943 (talk) 00:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Title of subject is not even mentioned at the target. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_December_29&oldid=1088109803"