Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strength and Compassion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as non-notable. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 22:43, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strength and Compassion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence to show notability as a book. Editor is a SPA for the author and associated topics See also adjacent afds. DGG ( talk ) 01:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This book turned into an exhibit at the International Photography Hall of Fame and was also featured on an HEC Special which I contend would count as "two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself" --Chad.huber (talk) 08:37, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

appearance on a local station is not significant for notability; and what's the evidence for the exhibition? DGG ( talk ) 18:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence for the exhibition. I'd never heard of the "International Photography Hall of Fame". What I found when I googled for it suggests that it's a photo gallery in St Louis, MO, with an extraordinarily grand name. -- Hoary (talk) 00:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article (which survived AfD) on the photographer says that he lives in St Louis, MO, so this will be his local photo gallery. There's no indication that the book was exhibited (an extraordinarily rare event for a photobook, though it has occurred for The Americans and a very few others). Instead, there was an exhibition of the photos that also appear in the book, as is very normal at around the time when a photobook is published. (Incidentally, the "hall of fame" that in some unspecified way is attached to the gallery is very odd. It seems to be no more than a collection of web pages, one per "inductee". That on Gordon Parks, for example, is a curious mishmash of writing in the third person and the first. "Parks has been inducted into the Black Film Makers Hall of Fame, the NAACP Hall of Fame and now the International Photography Hall of Fame", it tells us [emphasis added]. When was "now"? What actually happened? We're not told.) -- Hoary (talk) 23:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree that this page can/should be deleted and/or consolidated with Eric Greitens. Benchmark.stl ( talk ) 16:46, 01 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I said at the author's AfD, there's simply not much. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~If the article on the politician/photographer survives, redirect to this; if it doesn't,~~ delete. Evidence for its notability is very weak. -- Hoary (talk) 00:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC) Simplified to "delete", on consideration of DDG's pithy comment below. -- Hoary (talk) 23:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Eric Greitens as a plausible search term. Doesn't appear to merit a standalone article, but a redirect to the article in which it is mentioned is justified. --Michig (talk) 08:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

rtoo minor to by an reasonable search term in an encycopedia . WP is not a library catalog. DGG ( talk ) 09:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Searches turned up nothing to show this comes close to meeting the notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no redirect, There is no significant coverage, fails the general notability guidelines. As DGG points out, the topic is too minor for the search term to be meaningful. It is not in the same universe with Triumph of the Will. --Bejnar (talk) 16:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.