Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Thompson (2nd nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spencer Thompson[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Spencer Thompson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOCCER with 0 professional appearances and WP:GNG. Any coverage found seems to be WP:ROUTINE. Player does not appear to still be playing. GauchoDude (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep - Passes WP:NFOOTY because he has played in Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup. Even though he has only played one game and has most probably retired, he still passes the criteria. Spiderone 18:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - as per GiantSnowman Spiderone 21:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Passes WP:NFOOTY, and doesn't really matter if he's playing or not currently. MYS77 ✉ 19:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Request for clarification, actually. Can someone explain how he passes WP:NSOCCER? I understand it used to have a bullet point contained which said something to the effect of "a competitive match between two professional teams", meaning a lot of US Open Cup matches would count towards notability, however that is no longer present. For me, "Players who have played, and managers who have managed in a fully professional league, will generally be regarded as notable" coupled with "For the purposes of this guideline, played means having appeared in a match either in the starting line-up or coming on as a substitute" shows that he fails WP:NSOCCER. I'd love some clarification here. GauchoDude (talk) 13:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per GS and per WP:NSPORT: the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. This is an individual who made one appearance in a cup game featuring two fully professional teams over four years ago. He has since not played at anywhere near the level required by WP:NFOOTY. The techincal pass of a subject specific guideline does not trump GNG. This player is not generally notable since the field in which he claims notability is one in which he has actually done very little. Fenix down (talk) 15:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom, Fenix down, and GiantSnowman. Onel5969 TT me 12:51, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Spencer_Thompson_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1138783733"