Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metodija Stepanovski

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mr.Z-man 01:43, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Metodija Stepanovski[edit]

Metodija Stepanovski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Though the article might technically meet WP:NSPORT because of two appearances in the Greek top flight almost ten years ago (which are only confirmed by transfermarkt, an unreliable source), the article clearly fails WP:GNG that even if it does meet WP:NSPORT it falls under the part of that guideline that says the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. (Emphasis theirs). Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:45, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:45, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per GS, whilst there is scope for young players to be given some grace if it seems reasonable they will keep playing, this guy is 30. Seems highliy unlikely he will achieve much more that would fulfil NFOOTY, let alone GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, WP:GNG failure, as GS mentioned as well, there is precedent to delete despite a bare passing of WP:NFOOTBALL, in cases where GNG is not met. I believe this is the case here. C679 11:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.