User talk:MYS77

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WARNING: This page can contain messages in another language, which can cause misunderstanding to another users. If you want to know what these messages correctly mean, please, feel free to ask for a translation. Cheers, MYS77

Meu bravo tudo bem? Espero sinceramente que sim :)

Escuta, consegues arranjar referências para alguns títulos por favor? O administrador do costume com as suas "contribuições"...

Um forte abraço para ti e para o Brasil, nesta altura terrível, obrigado de antemão! --Quite A Character (talk) 18:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Feito, amigo! Aqui estamos "à deriva", por assim dizer. O governo passa longe de ser bom, e a população também passa longe de colaborar, então... vamos levando do jeito que conseguimos. Abraços a Portugal também, espero que estejam melhor do que nós :) MYS77 20:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dani Barrio[edit]

I don't that things because I like see you working ;)

@AlejandroR1990: Being ironic doesn't improve a thing here. You can't even sign your own messages, that's actually basic. You're not a newbie, please take some time and read WP:CIR to see if it sheds some light into your edits. Cheers, MYS77 03:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Favor[edit]

Bom, como vês já fui (espero que seja de vez desta vez, mas tou sempre dizendo o mesmo!)...

Podes-me só fazer um favor? Reverte este cafageste por favor (se for eu, pensam que tou tirando sarro, "retired"?!), pra ele não ficar rindo (ver aqui https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kapanar). Este palhaço é esse daqui (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP, ver pra crer), eu fui dos poucos que lhe dei conversa no passado, agora é uma perseguição incrível (e infelizmente, não só a mim). Depois da reversão é muito simples, não voltar a entrar na WP nunca mais e já não tenho de me chatear como está este ou aquele artigo, há muitos bons sites por aí sem ser este (se bem que temos de concordar que, no papel, o conceito da WP é bem legal). Vê também quem voltou pra me azucrinar, chamei-lhe o que ele é no Quique Setién (dia 16 de Agosto), ameaçou-me de levar a coisa mais além se visse isso outra vez. Cansei mesmo!

Tu foste dos poucos que sempre concordou com a minha maneira de editar, não sei como é que não tiveste tantos problemas como eu (FELIZMENTE, claro). Um abração, tudo de bom e força! --Quite A Character (talk) 04:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Feito! "Don't feed the trolls", meu amigo... O sujeito já está bloqueado (de novo), certeza que não irá te chatear novamente. Não se deixe abater, abraços! MYS77 04:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado meu chapa! Esqueceste-te do Lito Vidigal :( --Quite A Character (talk) 21:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Feito! Abraços, MYS77 22:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see i have created problems for you. And i should not have written the message in Portuguese when mentioning another person, especially using the language i used (but the BKFIP has insulted many users in the past, including myself). I have already apologised to this person at WP:FOOTY (and i am sure the message he left you here was directed at me, the WP:FOOTY report was about ME), and i apologise to you here and now.

PS. i have also left a "goodbye message" at WP:FOOTY. Cheers, take care! --Quite A Character (talk) 04:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: No worries mate. As I said before, "don't feed the trolls"... Just keep on doing what you're doing, if our grammar is wrong, then people will point it out in a more civil manner than this guy is doing right now. Cheerio, MYS77 04:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was the result of me trying to apologise and interact with (some) people (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:185.14.215.74)... As we say in Portuguese, bem feito! --Quite A Character (talk) 20:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Well, I would say that you went too civil with this one... That's why we shouldn't apologize much to jerks, right? Cheerio, MYS77 22:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atlético Malagueño[edit]

 Done GiantSnowman 08:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just Betis[edit]

I didn't expect do this but, thanks for this. Real Betis Balompié was always know just as Betis, not Real Betis.

Francisco Feuillassier[edit]

 Done GiantSnowman 08:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

can you please do me (better said, WP!) a favour? Just replace the enormous dash in this player's infobox, display the club's name properly and insert new club category/template (if available). I can't do it myself, as everybody knows i'm a terrible editor!

Cheers, thanks in advance --Quite A Character (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character:  Done MYS77 23:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate! And this (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eduardo_Machado_(footballer)&diff=977706624&oldid=975739924, User:The Almightey Drill, now editing with several IPs, not a vandal no sir, a good contributor)?! Never expected this, we always got along well :( Will leave him a message, not hoping for any reply... --Quite A Character (talk) 00:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • See what you can do here please (box, late storyline). WOW, the last "user" did not even get a warning for what they did to the player's name, incredible! --Quite A Character (talk) 20:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Patience[edit]

Hi MYS77. Could you please show a little more patience? Some editors don't follow all discussions at WP:FOOTY and aren't aware of all the newest conventions. Fodbold-fan is a very prolific editor and even if they make mistakes, there's no question they are a great asset for Wikipedia's footballer articles. When I have pointed out mistakes in their editing, I have seen them be quick to learn. And I actually don't see them has behaving as rude in the discussion at their Talk page, they've been asking good-faith questions. "and God knows how much more" and "the third time" aren't very kind things to say, either.

It would be a shame to drive away good editors. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on: I've pointed out the discussion for him to read three times in a row. Three times. I'm certain he didn't even went to the page to read what the notes were pointing out. I'm sure the guy is prolific, but I'm also sure that is very tiring to "chew up" things to others when it's pretty clear to understand if you show a little bit of effort. You talk about kindness, but I don't see any type of kindness when I get a reply as some kind of "if you don't explain everything to me so I won't need to make a little effort, then shut up and leave me be". I'm merely trying not to fix these edits all the time, it's tiring. Cheers, MYS77 21:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The way you started the discussion, I'm not surprised they reacted the way they did. In my experience, other editors are much more receptive to constructive feedback if the feedback shows you are assuming they want to improve Wikipedia and not hurt it. As far as I can tell, you had pointed the issue out to them only once before you came to their page. I know much more difficult editors, I can assure you. ;-)
Also, consider the possibility they didn't even know what "state leagues" are. There's no link at the player template page.
"these stats are not in Soccerway. That's what I said before, Soccerway is covering the state leagues correctly from 2018 onwards, before that the stats are loose and you have to do some digging to find out properly." I had no idea about this and I tend to follow things very closely here… I guess that goes to show it is easy to make a mistake about Brazilian players' stats. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Robby.is.on: Yes, Soccerway only have some accuracy in the Campeonato Paulista and Campeonato Carioca. The others are covered correctly from 2018 onwards, but when they're not there it doesn't mean the guy didn't play there. I do know a lot of sources though to confirm the players' stats, but many of them are not reliable due to being Blogs or some non-notable sites. Here in Brazil we didn't care that much to statistics before, it's a shame. If you guys want, I can add sources that I use to confirm the stats correctly... MYS77 21:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think that would be great! :-) Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Links lacks a "Brazil" section, that would probably be a good place to put the links. Robby.is.on (talk) 21:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on: @Fodbold-fan: Sure thing... I get my stats from:

  1. www.jogosdoguarani.com (Related to Guarani FC. There you have some good player profiles from 2002 onwards, but only related to their period at Guarani)
  2. sumulas-tche.blogspot.com (Related to Campeonato Gaúcho. On this, you have to manually count the stats per the reports, but it's reliable)
  3. www.futebol80.com.br (it's good mainly for Sociedade Esportiva Palmeiras seasons. You can click on the club, and then go to "Fichas Técnicas" match reports)
  4. The state leagues' federations websites: all of them are good enough to get the reports, but again you'll have to manually count the appearances per the reports
  5. www.cruzeiro.com.br (related to Cruzeiro Esporte Clube, but not available amymore,. You can get the archive links to some seasons at Jonathan Moreira, when I improved his article I added some sources there related to this site in the career statistics section)
  6. www.galodigital.com.br (related to Clube Atlético Mineiro)
  7. www.gremiopedia.com (related to Grêmio Foot-Ball Porto Alegrense)
  8. www.furacao.com (related to Club Athletico Paranaense, but their archive pages are more complete)
  9. www.historiadocoritiba.com.br (related to Coritiba Foot Ball Club)
  10. www.acervosantista.com.br / www.acervosantosfc.com (related to Santos FC)
  11. www.bangu.net (related to Bangu Atlético Clube)
  12. www.futeboldegoyaz.com.br (related to Campeonato Goiano and clubs from the state)
  13. www.pontepreta.net (related to Associação Atlética Ponte Preta - site is down, but archive pages do the trick. Some examples can be found at Aranha (footballer)
  14. www.uniaomania.com (related to União São João Esporte Clube)
  15. afenet (related to Associação Ferroviária de Esportes - also down, but some examples can be found at Leandro Donizete)
  16. www.flunomeno.com (related to Fluminense FC)
  17. www.meutimenarede.com.br (related to Criciúma Esporte Clube)

There might be more, but I can't recall right now... MYS77 22:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on: I'll do some do-over here to see if there's more, and once done I'll add them there. MYS77 22:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic! 👍 Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...[edit]

Olha o que me saiu na "lotaria" (ver aqui https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/188.192.201.70)? Será outro perseguidor ou apenas coincidência? E esta tarde já confirmei outro (ver o Jorge Molina (footballer)). Eu sei que os artigos não não meus, mas há coisas bem esquisitas a meu ver...

Um abraço, boa semana meu chapa --Quite A Character (talk) 03:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Parece ser que sim, o utilizador alemão vai me perseguir até o fim da minha "wiki-vida", que tristeza alguns "utilizadores" hem? --Quite A Character (talk) 22:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Quite A Character: O desemprego pode ser um problema para algumas pessoas... :) "Keep it up", amigo! Boa semana, MYS77 22:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Podes meter o Ricardo (footballer, born 1980) na tua "watchlist" por favor? Talvez se uma conta registada o reverter ele respeite mais (já agora, ainda bem que o Ricardo não jogava também a lateral esquerdo e a líbero e volante, senão ia tudo na caixa!). Obrigado, cheers (e como vemos no Eduardo Machado (footballer), o outro também continua muito atento, ver artigos horríveis em termos de "qualidade" na mesma durante anos – já agora, ainda te lembras do nosso amigo User:Lglukgl? – e este senhor só "arruma" artigos de futebol que EU edite, repugnante)! --Quite A Character (talk) 22:29, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Esse daí eu nem perco mais o meu tempo tentando argumentar... Um autêntico "troll". Quanto ao Ricardo, já está na Watchlist. Abraços, MYS77 22:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jano (footballer, born 1986), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Bull Salzburg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dá pra pores na tua watchlist, por favor (se não, não faz mal)? A minha versão é a que está correcta, ele é um antigo ("former") jogador mas também antigo treinador, está reformado das duas profissões há anos. E o "amigo" alemão é como tantos, usa vários IPs para poder "contribuir" à vontade.

Um abraço, obrigado de antemão e tudo de bom! --Quite A Character (talk) 21:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Feito! Não seria bom pedir um IP range block para o sujeito? MYS77 21:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deixa pra lá meu chapa (ou pelo menos, acho que a mim ninguém me ligava nenhuma se eu pedisse, e este IP não é propriamente um vândalo)! Acho que é melhor fazer "RBI" (reverter, bloquear, ignorar), neste caso sem o "B" ;) --Quite A Character (talk) 21:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, tudo em cima?

Sabes como é que se elimina isto? Acho que (já) não é preciso "disambiguation", uma vez que só o jogador de 1990 é conhecido assim. Não sei quem teve a brilhante idéia de achar que o jogador de 1956 também era conhecido assim (claro que sei, ver isto https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juan_Carlos_(footballer,_born_1956)&diff=980087779&oldid=980085669!!).

Um abraço, e novamente obrigado de antemão por aquilo que conseguires fazer :) --Quite A Character (talk) 21:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Não entendi, pensas em remover o redirect? Porque a "disambig" já foi corrigida, o link em questão já vai pro cidadão nascido em 1990. Abraços, MYS77 21:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sem dúvida que alguém já corrigiu! Dantes, quando inserias "Juankar" no motor de busca, aparecia uma página com esse título, dizendo "Juankar may refer to:", seguido ERRADAMENTE dos dois jogadores acima mencionados. Pronto, já percebi que desta vez tive resultados com o meu relatório no WP:FOOTY :)

Bom fim de semana aí, abraços também! --Quite A Character (talk) 23:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Jesús Sillero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He hasn't played in a WP:FPL match.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 08:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HawkAussie: He did, played for Almería and Córdoba in the Copa del Rey, against Rayo Vallecano and Tenerife, two professional teams. According to WP:FOOTY, those are valid matches per WP:FPL standards. MYS77 13:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Grettings MYS77. @HawkAussie: was right, he dont played in 2nd division, just played a Cup match.Pincheira22 (talk) 00:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Pincheira22: Per WP:NFOOTY point 2: Players who have played [...] in a competitive game between two teams from fully professional leagues. It doesn't say that the game has to be a league game, rather that it should be a competitive game (Copa Del Rey) between two teams (Almeira v Rayo Vallecano) from fully competitive leagues (both in the Segunda Division). Nehme1499 01:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah! thanks, im new here.Pincheira22 (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Pincheira22: No worries, and welcome :) Nehme1499 17:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

E aí meu chapa? Tudo em cima?

Estive dando uma arrumada no artigo desse cidadão/compatriota, não sei se já conhecias. Eu admito que não sabia nada dele e a filha do grande Bebeto (que suponho que será irmã mais velha desse daí https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOjjaaLUzEM&ab_channel=FIFATV! Aliás, agora lembro, até já jogou em Portugal caralho!).

Consegues, por favor, arranjar alguma coisa pra carreira dele no Brasil (primeiro parágrafo, verdade seja dita que jogou muito pouco lá não é? E em times modestos, que têm bem menos cobertura que os "gigantes" infelizmente)? Um abraço, muito obrigado de antemão! --Quite A Character (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Adicionei duas referências lá no artigo, o resto é bem mais "obscuro"... Abraços, MYS77 04:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Belo trabalho no Jano (footballer, born 1986)! Acho que estamos todos de parabéns (eu, tu, o editor alemão que traduziu uma parte de uma referência depois de eu lhe pedir ajuda; era muito difícil, era dialeto austríaco!).

Abraços, bom fim de semana (não é que faça muita diferença com esta merda de vírus, os dias agora são todos iguais...) --Quite A Character (talk) 00:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Fiquei meio decepcionado por não ter achado as estatísticas do chapa no Majadahonda e nem no Puerta Bonita, mas... "I guess you can't have it all". Quanto às traduções, eu também só me arrisco no espanhol e no inglês, nos demais é dá-lhe Google Tradutor e olhe lá...
Infelizmente (ou felizmente) para mim, aqui no Brasil a minha área de trabalho continua "normal" (estamos trabalhando de casa), parece-me que estar em uma empresa que fornece serviços de tecnologia para bancos não para nunca... isso sem contar as pessoas que já desistiram de respeitar a quarentena aqui, se for ver nossos casos diários são estáveis na parte de cima, é absurdo. Abraços, boa semana! MYS77 00:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vitor Prada Maçaneiro for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vitor Prada Maçaneiro, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitor Prada Maçaneiro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Formiga (footballer, born 1995) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Formiga (footballer, born 1995), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formiga (footballer, born 1995) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teamwork[edit]

Oi aí! Tudo em cima?

Queres tentar falar com o nosso velho wiki-amigo User:JimmyCrow (duvido que tenhas sorte, mas tentar não custa, isso se concordares com o que vou dizer a seguir)? No Sergi Roberto (e nos outros milhões também, claro!), acho que quando que o jogador não teve qualquer participação nos torneios conquistados (zero jogos na liga, zero presenças em banco nas diversas copas) não merece o título. Pode ser muito boa pessoa, fazer ótimo espírito de grupo, mas não ganhou nada!

Prometi a ele que não ia reverter nada, nem "fazer queixinhas" desta conta (não é bonito fazer isso e nem sequer é vandalismo), o artigo fica mal e pronto! Qual a tua opinião? Abraços, até mais :) --Quite A Character (talk) 01:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Eu digo (assim como o fiz) que devemos reverter, não põe lá uma referência comprovando que o cara ganhou a medalha, que "simbolicamente" mostra que foi campeão junto com o clube... Lembro que tiveram casos onde jogadores não jogaram mas ganharam medalha, e com isso foram considerados campeões aqui, mas nesses casos sempre havia uma referência comprovando a existência da tal medalha. Abraços! MYS77 02:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eu sei que a pergunta pode ser um pouco idiota, mas já ouviste falar destes caras (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSsH5R6z34A&ab_channel=Rau%C3%A3Ara%C3%BAjo, no fim de contas, tiveram o seu fim bem trágico tinhas tu um ano de idade)? Tenho ouvido bastante estes últimos dias pra lembrar, se quisessem ter feito carreira com música "séria" também tinham tido sucesso!

Abraços para o Brasil!! --Quite A Character (talk) 04:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mais, parece que parte da letra da música que te enviei ("1406") teve inspiração nesta história hilária do Ricardo Rocha (http://www.espn.com.br/video/674447_em-94-ricardo-rocha-se-embananou-trocou-kamikaze-por-kawasaki-em-discurso-e-relaxou-o-grupo-antes-de-final), veja e divirta-se ;) --Quite A Character (talk) 06:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Ah sim, ouvi várias músicas deles já, meu pai gosta. Morreram num acidente de avião, tragicamente, na melhor fase da carreira... Abraços a Portugal também! MYS77 13:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bom, já foste revertido no Firpo, e se calhar a seguir no S.Roberto, desisto (não sei que lhe fizemos para que não fale ao menos connosco)! Outra coisa, as estatísticas brasileiras do cidadão João Victor (ah, e anos também, já que os campeonatos brasileiros decorrem no ano civil) estão corretas, ou será o vandalismo do costume?

Força aí! --Quite A Character (talk) 01:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Estou tentando confirmar os jogos do João, por enquanto um belo de um trabalho hercúleo... Ao que parece, o homem deixou o Náutico no meio de 2007, rescindindo o contrato após não receber salários, e foi para o São Caetano. Inicialmente jogou no time sub-20 durante o Campeonato Paulista Sub-20 de 2007, e jogou um jogo no Campeonato Paulista de 2008 contra o Mirassol. Em 2008 ele foi para o Treze na Série C, antes de chegar no Mogi Mirim em 2009, onde ele ficou só uma semana após um convite do grande Rivaldo para jogar no Bunyodkor. No caso, as estatísticas do Treze estão definitivamente erradas, visto que o time jogou apenas seis jogos na Série C de 2008, e lá tava escrito 15/2. MYS77 05:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Parece que ele também é filho de ex-jogador, o goleiro Flávio Barros Bruno da Silva. MYS77 05:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Já vem outra vez o "véio" chateando: consegues, por favor, alguma referência para o parágrafo #1 da historinha do Cássio Albuquerque dos Anjos? Eu só consegui isto (http://globoesporte.globo.com/ESP/Noticia/Arquivo/0,,AA1168280-4283,00.html), perto mas não chega :(

Um abração, bom fim de semana! --Quite A Character (talk) 07:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Opa, sem problemas. Adicionei um pouquinho mais de historinha para contextualizar melhor, e algumas referências. Consegui algumas estatísticas também...
Ah, não sei se sabes, mas agora na caixinha também incluímos os jogos no campeonato estadual para os times brasileiros, foi uma coisa que eu estive perguntando há uns meses atrás e incluí no WP:FOOTY/Players após um acordo lá no WT:FOOTY. Abraços! MYS77 15:25, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many many thanks! Sim, já sabia dessa das estatísticas, se calhar no ano que vem a regra da WP muda outra vez ;) --Quite A Character (talk) 19:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agora foi a minha vez no Cássio (carreira em Portugal, acho que a tua está mais completa sinceramente), estamos os dois de parabéns pelo bom trabalho! Obrigado de novo. --Quite A Character (talk) 20:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Conforme se pode ver no Cássio e no "agora brasileiro" Abel Ferreira, voltou a perseguição. No Ferreira fui acusado de ter um parágrafo (que na versão horrível que era a minha começava com "From 2008/09 onwards, Ferreira began...") cujas fontes não diziam nada disso (que mentira!). Isto apanha-me numa altura má da minha vida como se não bastasse, por isso só digo isto: que se foda isto tudo, agora chega mesmo!!! Espero que tudo corra bem contigo, um grande abraço --Quite A Character (talk) 06:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Quite A Character: "Don't feed the trolls", meu amigo. Se o homem não conversa e remove/reverte tudo com um simples "cl" nas revisões, a culpa não é sua. Abraços! MYS77 14:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ná, melhor achar outra coisa pra fazer com o meu tempo livre. Daqui saio sem um tostão e cheio de dores de cabeça. O sujeito conseguiu o que queria, só desejava que algum dia alguém lhe fizesse o mesmo (a do Abel Ferreira então é gravíssima, remover conteúdo referenciado porque decidiu que não estava)! Abraços --Quite A Character (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Só preciso de um favor: daqui a uma/duas semana(s), envia-me uma mensagem a dizer quais têm sido as contribuições do cidadão, se ainda continua a limpar o meu trabalho horrível (são milhares de artigos que eu estraguei, que trabalheira enorme vai ter o pobre), se edita outros artigos de futebol (ou outros esportes) ou se, por arte de magia, perdeu todo o interesse em editar futebol. Felizmente tiveste mais sorte do que eu (e os nossos estilos editoriais são quase iguais), nunca me hei-de esquecer quando lhe perguntei porque não te perseguia também e ele disse que fazia sim senhor. O caralho, quando ele editava em artigos onde tu trabalhavas é porque EU lá tinha estado também!! Mas repito, ainda bem que não foste outra vítima.

Mais abraços! --Quite A Character (talk) 21:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Olhando agora, parece que já parou... Eu entendo isso como um claríssimo caso de WP:HOUND. MYS77 01:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tens uma mensagem na página do utilizador, onde é claro que nada é admitido e mais uma vez eu sou o mau da fita. Já deixei mais umas linhas adicionais. --Quite A Character (talk) 19:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Já respondeu, muito "simpático" de novo. Em uma semana vejo as contribuições do utilizador, se o seu interesse por futebol tiver parado podes ter a certeza que levo isto a um administrador! --Quite A Character (talk) 21:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My first edit of a football article [1] was 15 years ago, long before I ever saw any of QAC's edits. Feel free to take this to an admin now. --hippo43 (talk) 23:10, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forget what i said man, no further action will be taken (as well as no further edits, and before you people think i only wrote this after i saw your latest interaction, i only got home now and wrote this before even reading your full discussion). Why should i try to make @Hippo43: feel bad, when i already feel miserable and there is a chance he is correct in his assumptions? I apologise to both of you, and also apologise to you my Brazilian friend for learning to edit here with such a lousy editor as myself as teacher.

Happy Christmas and happy new year to both of you, from Portugal! --Quite A Character (talk) 04:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Então, a perseguição e a "limpeza" ainda continuam ou já cagou? Fiquei quase com vontade com vontade de chorar quando vi o que ele fez ao Abel Ferreira (removendo conteúdo com referências no "playing career"), não sei se alguém já pôs de volta mas já não quero saber daquele artigo; já agora, espero que ele não tenha começado também a "limpar" as tuas edições, só pra me fazer passar por mentiroso, espero isso sinceramente.

Um favor, o último de 2020 (LOL!): podes mudar a página Pedró Ferreira (footballer, born 1987) para "Pedró" (não sei se será preciso indicar profissão ou ano de nascimento no novo título)? O "iluminado" do costume, misturando nomes próprios com apelidos (e já agora, espero que este artigo não seja também objeto de grandes "melhoramentos" ainda hoje assim que esta mensagem for lida por outra pessoa que não tu)...

Um grande abraço, e votos renovados de feliz Natal e novo ano!! --Quite A Character (talk) 21:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Movido para Pedró. Mandei também uma mensagem ao nosso amigo "brilhante" sobre esses page moves, parece que vou ter que levar ao WP:ANI de novo, para ver se alguém consegue barrar os direitos dele, porque já era cansativo corrigir, está ficando cada dia mais. Quanto ao seu stalker preferido, parece que o interesse em futebol de repente sumiu... Se eu fosse você, também levava ao ANI como um caso de WP:HOUND, para mim é claríssimo. O chapa pode falar o que quiser, mas quando "do nada" o interesse dele pelo assunto some assim que te afasta do site também, isso para mim é perseguição não importa o quanto ele fale que não. Abraços e boas festas!! MYS77 22:54, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conforme podemos ver no Ángel Rodríguez (Spanish footballer), a perseguição continua. Sim, "netted" é um termo tão inapropriado que até a BBC Sport o usa! O utilizador anterior (um tal de Julianstout) fodeu o texto todo com vírgulas (p.e "7 June, 2012," em vez de "7 June 2012,"), o perseguidor não esteve nem aí pra corrigir isso, só o meu horrível trabalho!!

Como está a lista de "contribuições" do senhor? Um abraço, bom ano (sem doenças, de preferência)! --Quite A Character (talk) 06:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Quite A Character: Fico feliz em saber que voltaste! Quanto às contribuições do amigo, só vejo edições em artigos de jogadores espanhóis logo após você editá-los. Ainda acho que é um caso bem claro de WP:HOUND e que você poderia muito bem denunciá-lo. Somado aos ataques pessoais (contra o WP:NPA), o sujeito ganharia um blockzinho de alguns dias para aprender a ser mais civilizado e um pouco menos inflexível. Abraços! MYS77 13:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agora Vicente Iborra (sumários como "not English", parece que tira sarro e tudo!). Amanhã, vou pedir ajuda a um utilizador fiável na página de um jogador alemão (eu também falo alemão, mas nunca mais toco naquele artigo, tenho mais pena de não melhorar o Abel Ferreira mas que se foda!), e aproveito e mando o link da conversa a um administrador. Serás mencionado e alertado ("ping"), pra deixar a tua opinião sincera; se concordares, e se concordares comigo como penso, não quero que arranjes problemas por minha causa.

Abraços --Quite A Character (talk) 02:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Já sabes minha opinião, amigo. Para mim, analisando isso da forma mais imparcial possível, me parecem sérios problemas de HOUND e NPA... Abraços, MYS77 02:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ainda não fiz o relatório, tenho estado a trabalhar na vida real...Para já, you-ve got mail (personal mail, not wiki-mail)! Abraços, até mais --Quite A Character (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ei, eu só queria dizer o que está acontecendo. Espero que ambos estejam bem. Não se esqueça de alimentar o burro ao anoitecer, e estar sempre fechando. Drmies (talk) 22:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • LOL :@Drmies:, what the (grammatical) heck? As a matter of fact i ain't right (wiki-wise), perhaps reading through this enormous thread you'll understand something, but i'll tell you this in the meantime: it involves stalking, the same that happened to me one or two years ago. Cheers, more later (after finishing some real-life work)! --Quite A Character (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Haha, I was just worried about the donkey--Google Translate suggested that y'all were discussing donkey management and there was something about how port is superior to madeira? I could be wrong. Drmies (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Então MYS, não viste o teu mail pessoal? Podes ajudar por favor? --Quite A Character (talk) 19:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Acabei de ler aqui. I'll write in English so that our friend @Drmies: can understand it too. Reverted the dude on Casilla and Llorente, both are in my watchlist. So far, until now, it seems like another one of those IPs who will bother for a few days before leaving (or being blocked)... I've also sent a message to the dude on Mario, even though he was gramatically correct, he can't speak like this, TBH...
What about the other case with the Hippo dude? Did he stop stalking you? And Mies, what did you try to write here? Hahahahaha basically, to resume the whole thing, an user who goes by Hippo43 is breaching WP:HOUND and some bits of WP:NPA on QAC... I told him not to do so (you can see that in his talk page, on the December archive), in the most unbiased way I could be, and yet he told me I'm biased. I also told QAC to raise an WP:ANI but he was/is too busy in the real life to do so, but it seems like the thing has cooled down a little bit right now.
Cheers to you all, from a (very) dangerous Brazil "covid-wise". MYS77 19:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked the Llorente IP. What you guys need to do is go through the "Notable supporters" in Arsenal F.C. supporters and delete all these "fans"--it's completely trivial bullshit, and should at best only be retained for those who have coverage, like the Queen--not for every person who tweeted something. Drmies (talk) 22:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man! I'm so confused with myself, don't know if i stay or if i go, sad... Regarding the last developments, don't know if you read your personal mail or not, but that IP on Mario is Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP, more than a troll a total human waste, and i don't know how they manage to do that but they have IPs from all around the world! I nearly replied that horrible message, but thought better and left them talking alone...

Cheers also :) --Quite A Character (talk) 21:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Excelente...fiz um relatório no WP:FOOTY porque acho que é importante que exista um parágrafo da carreira de jogador do Abel Ferreira que o outro não me deixa escrever (fui por isso lá pedir ajuda) e outro utilizador fez "ping" ao senhor, veremos o que irá lá dizer de mim quando receber a notificação...Eu não fiz "ping" de propósito, não foi o senhor que disse que eu estava obcecado comigo e pra o deixar em paz? Assim fiz, fui pedir ajuda a outras fontes (e fi-lo educadamente, não fiz qualquer referência a nenhum outro utilizador que não eu). --Quite A Character (talk) 20:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Quite A Character: Bom, agora é só aguardar, amigo. Faltou mencionar que o cidadão quebrou o WP:NPA ao te ofender... Se continuar, recomendo usar o WP:ANI para que mais pessoas possam avaliar os casos. Bom fim de semana, MYS77 20:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Não acho sinceramente que ele o tenha feito (ofender, onde achas que foi?), mas eu não o insultei de certeza (tirando o chamar "perseguidor", e pedi desculpa assim que fui ameaçado com wiki-ações). Bom fim de semana também --Quite A Character (talk) 20:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Eu entenderia como uma ofensa pessoal se alguém disser que eu sou obcecado comigo mesmo, mas vai saber. Foi a única coisa mais ofensiva que eu vi na conversa, poderemos, na linguagem desta WP, "let it slide". Se ele voltar a falar algo do gênero, aí teremos certeza que foram ofensas, e um ANI seria o melhor caminho. MYS77 20:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bom, infelizmente já tens também um wiki-inimigo, e este bem mais grave (quando começam com abordagens relativas à vida privada de cada um, a bola é outra! Por isso que eu não tenho rede social, já tive FB mas durou menos do que custa ler a primeira letra desta cidade, eh, eh eh!). Coragem, tudo se há-de resolver. Olha, eu dou mesmo o fora, se calhar passo cá daqui a uns dias só pra ver a resposta do outro no WP:FOOTY (quero vê-lo ofender-me, quando eu apenas fiz "discuss content, not contributor" tal como mandam as regras) e rir-me um pouco. Já chega (ainda editei com outro IP estes dias, o computador mudou sozinho, não fiz de propósito; sei que acreditas, outros não. Como sempre, essas minhas contribuições devem estar uma merda, o outro que limpe se quiser).

Meu caro, quando falamos aqui ou na vida real mas ninguém escuta, estamos perdendo o nosso tempo. Claro que cometi muitos erros aqui, mas acho que fui um bom editor. Há artigos que se não fosse eu (e tu também, claro que sim! O futebol brasileiro deve-te muito no que à WP diz respeito, parabéns) seriam uma autêntica merda. Se te ajudei aqui fico contente, agora já és um veterano e a coisa corre muito bem, exceto quando vem um babaca saído debaixo do sub-mundo com as suas "butãozices".

Abraços, tudo do melhor pra ti e para os teus! P.S.: Portugal está também um caos com a pandemia, a minha terrinha nem por isso mas não é consolo, isto é uma tragédia descomunal a nível mundial :( --Quite A Character (talk) 00:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.2: quando leres esta mensagem se quiseres apaga, isto já está parecendo um plenário do parlamento das Nações Unidas tal é o tamanho!! --Quite A Character (talk) 00:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Eu não ligo que encham a minha paciência, me xinguem e me ameacem, não tenho medo desses "trolls". O problema é que mexeram com a minha namorada... Isso eu não tolero. O que me chateia é que eu ainda tentei conversar, o máximo que podia, para um croata maluco de nome Stipe Volarevic (sim, vou postar o nome do cidadão aqui para deixar bem registrado, e sim, o cara é croata, vai entender) vir no meu Facebook e ficar me ameaçando, ir no Instagram da minha namorada criando contas falsas... Ela bem que me avisou pra eu não perder tempo aqui, mas eu ouvi? Acho que vou parar por um tempo também, não vale a pena.
Se quiseres ver, teve mais coisa: mandaram essa mensagem amistosa com mais ameaças. O bom é que o chapa disse-me que vem me visitar aqui no Brasil (que aliás está um caos na segunda onda, Manaus nem oxigênio tem), assim não gasto com viagens. Abraços, MYS77 01:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutamente vomitivo! Vale mesmo a pena, no meio de tanta gente morrendo (em Portugal há bem pouco íamos em 20 por dia, agora são 300!), saber e/ou teimar se o caralho da liga do Butão é ou não profissional (e ainda por cima, depois de provas incontáveis em sentido contrário, continuar dizendo que sim)! Bom, acho que já houve comentário adicional no WP:FOOTY, educado e só sobre conteúdos como deve ser. Vou deixar o artigo do "Palmeirão" Abel como está, és testemunha que quis melhorá-lo e não me deixaram.

Qualquer coisa que precises deste lado do oceano (e que possa ser feita via internet, LOL!), é só dizer! Um forte abraço --Quite A Character (talk) 01:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dito e feito! No WP:FOOTY, um utilizador fez queixinhas (não sei pra quê nem a relação. Mas também muito bem feito, disse que estava 100% retirado quando não estava. Agora estou, podes ter a certeza) do IP que utilizei esta semana, e o outro já se lançou ao trabalho para "limpar" e "melhorar" os artigos. Pode ficar com eles todos, que se foda!! --Quite A Character (talk) 02:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

O GS não edita desde as cinco da tarde, experimenta o Drmies se quiseres, um gajo legal. Força! --Quite A Character (talk) 02:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page move[edit]

Podes mudar esta página, por favor (se concordares, claro!)? Não quero ser eu a fazê-lo, pra não levar com comentários do género "Não estás retirado? O que é que andas aqui a fazer ainda idiota, a enganar as pessoas com "templates" falsos na tua página?"

Bom, passando ao dito favor, que mexida tão absurda, é como chamar ao Osasuna "CA Osasuna Pamplona", "S.L. Benfica Lisboa" ao Benfica ou "CR Flamengo Rio Janeiro" ao Fla! O nome deste clube é Lusitânia Futebol Clube, ponto final. Nota, se mudares a página (para "Lusitânia F.C.", acho que é o título mais acertado e era o que já estava antes desta "brilhante" ideia), não te esqueças de corrigir também o intro por favor.

Abraços, força meu chapa! --Quite A Character (talk) 06:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Movi de volta. Não houve consenso na movimentação anterior. Abraços, MYS77 14:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've got personal mail, cheers! --Quite A Character (talk) 12:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Done! Cheerio, MYS77 20:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More mail! --Quite A Character (talk) 21:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character:  Done. Cheers, MYS77 21:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon...[edit]

Just leave it, anyone with more that two brain cells can tell that the league isn't pro. Nehme1499 (talk) 14:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499: Haha exactly, now I think we got enough to block his IP as well, see his last post, calling me a liar may grant him a block under WP:NPA, right? Cheers, MYS77 14:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
One might give an argument for him "attacking the content [lies] not the contributor". I would just leave things as they are; the only other editor agreeing with him is doing so to push his personal agenda and viewpoint, so it's not really relevant to the discussion. Everyone else got bored before us ahahaha. Nehme1499 (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Nehme1499: Hahahaha, I don't even consider the other user, he brought up some nonsensical points which were incredibly rated as "some great points" by the IP guy... Impressive. After seing where it ended, I think we should've bolted earlier :) Happy editing, MYS77 15:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you too :) Nehme1499 (talk) 15:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

another evidence i won and link proves league became fully pro...you both can appeal to fifa or afc until they publish different, your job is not reverting new facts with outdated sources. lets see how far yet it goes in name of truth. last to mention i am personal friend of igor stimac (check him) and numerous balkan afc players, been there and live asian leagues 24/7, so will keep contributing truth before indications. cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.83.30 (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User page[edit]

I have deleted your user page and its entire history. If there's anything you want in order to create a new one please let me know. GiantSnowman 08:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The two language Wikipedias are separate, so I can't do it - you will have to ask there I'm afraid. GiantSnowman 09:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Given the seriousness, you should read Wikipedia:Crisis and contact the WMF and also consider notifying the police. GiantSnowman 09:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman: Thanks, already contacted them. MYS77 09:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vanishing[edit]

Again, I'm afraid I cannot help - you will have to follow instructions at Wikipedia:Courtesy vanishing. I wish you luck with future endeavours. GiantSnowman 10:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arent-Emil Hauge for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arent-Emil Hauge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arent-Emil Hauge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atarfe Industrial CF for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atarfe Industrial CF is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atarfe Industrial CF until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joselu (footballer, born 1987) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joselu (footballer, born 1987), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joselu (footballer, born 1987) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you okay?[edit]

Hi MYS77. Are you okay? What happened earlier this year must have been horrible for you. I frequently come across pages you created and/or edited. You've been a great contributor. :-) Robby.is.on (talk) 17:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mateu Ferrer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mateu Ferrer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateu Ferrer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BRDude70 (talk) 03:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mateu Ferrer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mateu Ferrer, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateu Ferrer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CF Reus Deportiu squad[edit]

Template:CF Reus Deportiu squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dani Gaíl for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dani Gaíl, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dani Gaíl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014–15 Gimnàstic de Tarragona season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 Gimnàstic de Tarragona season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sakiv (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article 2012–13 Gimnàstic de Tarragona season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant coverage per WP:GNG, which would be a requirement for a stand-alone season article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article 2013–14 Gimnàstic de Tarragona season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant coverage per WP:GNG, which would be a requirement for a stand-alone season article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AD Ceuta FC logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AD Ceuta FC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lorca FC squad[edit]

Template:Lorca FC squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. BRDude70 (talk) 23:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CD Estepona FS logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CD Estepona FS logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hugo Eyre for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugo Eyre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Eyre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Angelo (talk) 16:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SDC Polvorin.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SDC Polvorin.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FALILV Dance & Scream cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FALILV Dance & Scream cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Linares Deportivo logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Linares Deportivo logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brasileiro Série B logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brasileiro Série B logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brasileiro Série C logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brasileiro Série C logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brasileiro Série D logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brasileiro Série D logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CD Rincón de la Victoria.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CD Rincón de la Victoria.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Paraná Clube squad[edit]

Template:Paraná Clube squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]