Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arent-Emil Hauge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Whilst he may technically pass NFOOTBALL there is clear consensus that he doesn't pass gng and his overall career trajectory indicates he is unlikely to anytime soon. Fenix down (talk) 22:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arent-Emil Hauge[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to making 3 brief substitute appearances (totalling 18 minutes) in an allegedly 'fully professional league' six years ago. Subsequently he has played at a much lower level and there is little evidence of WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - don't see why the page should be deleted. He has played three fully-pro games, easily passing WP:NFOOTY. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 23:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NFOOTBALL. Timberlack (talk) 08:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockstrike. Blablubbs|talk 20:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one appearance is insufficient when GNG is failed comprehensively, as is the case here - 18 minutes of play is not enough. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a total failure of GNG. If this person passes our notability guidelines for football players those need to be tightened so they better predict passing of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.