Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shwe Eain Min

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shwe Eain Min[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by her husband sourced only to Facebook and YouTube. Can't see evidence that she passes WP:BASIC or WP:NACTOR but happy to be proved wrong. It doesn't help that most of these TV series that she has supposedly starred in seem to have coverage mainly on Facebook as well. Spiderone 11:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is supposed to be sourced to reliable sources, not just facebook and YouTube.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, total failure of WP:GNG, the only sources I could find that even mentioned her were social media and a couple of directory listings. Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: lacks SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth from IS RS. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements. // Timothy :: t | c | a 08:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.