Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Soroka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - WP:SNOW, this is a borderline WP:CSD#G11. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Soroka[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff page doesn't pass GNG or NARTIST Tarletonic (talk) 13:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, Television, and Ukraine. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - could not find significant coverage in reliable sources Mujinga (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This autobiography of a video editor does not meet WP criteria for notability per WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. The two "sources" in the article do not even mention her. None of the awards or nominations for awards are sourced and an online search brings up nothing. Netherzone (talk) 14:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if she really has won and been nominated for all of these awards then surely there'd be coverage but searches are bringing up nowt Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing found, a lady with the North Utica Senior's Center has coverage, same name. I don't see any sourcing for this film person. The awards also don't seem notable. Oaktree b (talk) 15:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. AFD has repeatedly found that winners of Regional Emmys (pg. 37) don't get a presumption of notability for merely winning the award. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 23:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As cited by fellow editors it lacks WP:GNG Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 03:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per reasoning stated above Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 00:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete for all the reasons mentioned above. Wikipedia should use this page as an example of an article that does not meet the criteria and should be removed. Go4thProsper (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Winners of local Emmys are not automatically notable. The other awards seem to be even less important. Bearian (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.