Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandal College Faisalabad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sandal College Faisalabad[edit]

Sandal College Faisalabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks any significant coverage, fails WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 12:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Weak Keep (see below): unless nominator is able to provide assurances that they have conducted in concentrated in print and/or local media. This is a weak nomination and should be opposed on the basis of WP:BEFORE, and the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability unless the above can be demonstrated Jack4576 (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I said in another thread, I use multiple tools to research and I consider myself well-versed in whatever I do. I usually don't like to waste participants' time, but for your assurance - I'm posting the links of passing mentions below (keep in my mind, to pass WP:ORGDEPTH we need significant coverage - more than one paragraph at least three time per WP:THREE):
This is not a policy-based argument, so the closing admin should discount it. BookishReader (talk) 21:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, it is a policy based argument to request that you follow the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability
Secondly, those articles don't pass WP:ORGDEPTH, and SIGCOV.
But SIGCOV and ORGDEPTH are not requirements for notability, they merely, upon their satisfaction, give rise to a presumption of notability.
Based on the apparent size and location of this school, and the fact that its existence can be established from the links you have shared, which appear to be reliable, I am still satisfied that this subject meets general encyclopedia notability.
In that circumstance I think a weak keep is the most appropriate vote. Jack4576 (talk) 10:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Searches in Urdu only yielded trivial mentions (announcements of seminars, listed along with other schools, etc.). Honestly even if this AfD ended with keep, the problem with the sources of this article won't get resolved. As of the time of writing, no sufficient sources that can be used to improve the article have been found. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 06:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:51, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Fails GNG and ORG. Source eval:
Comments Source
Nothing about subject, fails SIGCOV 1. "Corona claims two more lives in Faisalabad". The News International. 2020-12-08. Retrieved 2023-05-12.
Google search page 2. ^ https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ALeKk02uZ6SonbMXHZWWWHqyTCBPMVX9Cw:1588406278894&q=sandal+college+faisalabad&npsic=0&rflfq=1&rlha=0&rllag=31476975,73105272,301&tbm=lcl&ved=2ahUKEwjxvIzA2pTpAhVEKBoKHfziCe4QtgN6BAgKEAQ&tbs=lrf:!1m4!1u2!2m2!2m1!1e1!2m1!1e2!3sIAE,lf:1,lf_ui:2&rldoc=1#rlfi=hd:;si:;mv:[[31.487552545761293,73.12921946208496],[31.466397541227515,73.08132593791504],null,[31.47697564127402,73.1052727],15]
Primary 3. ^ "Sandal College Faisalabad". Sandalcollege.edu.pk. Retrieved 2016-06-08.
Primary 4. ^ "Sandal College Faisalabad". sandalcollege.edu.pk. Archived from the original on 2011-06-03.
Keep vote is an example of WP:SOURCESMAYEXIST, multiple BEFOREs (including Keep vote) showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  06:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.