Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxanne Dubé

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. NOQUORUM with no prejudice against speedy renomination (NPASR). J04n(talk page) 13:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roxanne Dubé[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO, WP:DIPLOMAT, and WP:GNG. coverage merely confirms her existence. there is no inherent notability attached to being an ambassador. LibStar (talk) 05:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. czar · · 06:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. czar · · 06:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 06:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. czar · · 06:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Google Books does reveal some tidbits but it's hard to see what they add up to. Hansard reports that she was commended a senator for her work in dangerous conditions, and she seems to be a Fulbright Scholar. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As a permanent ambassador, I presume that significant coverage can be found, perhaps in off-line sources, if someone spent the time to look. Pburka (talk) 03:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please provide actual evidence of sources. WP:MUSTBESOURCES. LibStar (talk) 07:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That essay was created with material deleted from WT:ATA and has been repeatedly rejected as representing Wikipedia policies and guidelines, see WT:ATA#History of TMBS. Unscintillating (talk) 00:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.