Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahal-Hogan RH-001

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rahal-Hogan RH-001[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to meet notability as presently written. Draft version of this article was previously declined for failing notability but User:Rowde moved the article to mainspace without any improvement. Article currently has two external links which discuss the car, but I believe they do not firmly establish notability. The³5₉ (Talk) 18:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think all of the article must be written differently and more about the cars and how it began, middle and ended. Rowde (talk) 18:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Rowde, I legitimately ask you because I know your understanding of English is poor: Do you know what notability means? The³5₉ (Talk) 19:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Finding sources Rowde (talk) 19:22, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A great-looking article but where did you find all of this information? Is there some written book you could cite? Mr. Magoo (talk) 16:08, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From one or two websites Rowde (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep while the article could use inline citations and overall improvements to citation and tone. The subject is inherently notable under the auspices of WP:MOTORSPORT and WP:AOWR. -Drdisque (talk) 20:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.