Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutan (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nutan (actor)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion contested by an IP editor. Possible paid editing. Does not meet GNG or NACTOR. Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Entertainment, and Nepal. Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete article seems fine. 2403:3800:3213:8D9A:4861:AF7D:CDFF:208A (talk) 07:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

I don't agree with you. There are a lot of references mentioned in the article. Those mentioned news talks and mentions about him. So, I don't think it's good to delete this page. I wouldn't consider this page for deletion. So, I request admin to remove the warning tag from the page . Thanks 🙏🙏🙏 103.163.182.101 (talk) 14:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't meet notability? Searched about him once. 103.163.182.101 (talk) 14:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly fails WP:NACTOR, no notable roles or awards or coverage Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree with you. His notable role is in Aarati, which is a web series in Nepal. It's releasing on January 1, after some days. You can search. There is a trailer and other videos on YouTube as well. You can check. 111.119.49.157 (talk) 16:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the reason I want you to cancel the nomination for deletion, respected sir. 111.119.49.157 (talk) 16:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, what's the update about this page, sir? I don't see anything wrong for this page to be considered for deletion. 🙏🙏 Ashok2025 (talk) 19:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page looks fine. So I request editors to cancel the deletion. Ashok2025 (talk) 19:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
hi, what's the update 111.119.49.224 (talk) 03:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NACTOR requires significant roles in multiple productions so even if the Aarati role is notable, which I doubt, then it would still be insufficient for NACTOR. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails NACTOR, also a WP:CRYSTAL violation if the author's point as above are valid. Not yet notable. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 19:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are hundreds of articles and magazine coverages about him. Just because you cannot read them in Nepalese language, so you are saying that 🙏🙏. I don't think it's suitable to delete this page 🙏 Ashok2025 (talk) 19:45, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

he is notable. Notable doesn't only mean to be world famous. He is notable in his field. huge mistake by administration. it should not be deleted. 111.119.49.157 (talk) 21:29, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's the update? When the deletion tag will be removed 2403:3800:3213:8D9A:E8CD:FAAC:A115:1A80 (talk) 06:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete the article looks fine, not bad. he seems to have worked in some notable projects. 2403:3800:3213:8D9A:E8CD:FAAC:A115:1A80 (talk) 07:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources show anything even close to WP:SIGCOV of him. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment to closing administrator. All of the IPs are likely owned by the creator of the article (who is now blocked). I have semi-protected the page to prevent further socking.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. General refs in the article are name mentions in promo, nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Nothing found in BEFORE that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, more name mentions and listings. BLPs requires strong sourcing. // Timothy :: talk 18:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: None provides SIGCOV. Fails ANYBIO and I see no indication of NACTOR 94rain ^Talk 01:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.