Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nixor College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nixor College[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Passing mentions in news reports. Fails WP:SIGCOV. BookishReader (talk) 12:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 13:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: unless nominator is able to provide assurances that they have conducted in concentrated in print and/or local media. This is a weak nomination and should be opposed on the basis of WP:BEFORE, and the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability unless the above can be demonstrated Jack4576 (talk) 15:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VAGUEWAVE. BookishReader (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

•DELETE- I did a search & no reliable sources come up. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 19:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you search local sources, including a reasonable search for local offline sources ? Jack4576 (talk) 08:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are local then you basicaly have no true say & should not be editing the page because you have a WP:CONFLICT_OF_INTEREST. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 16:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Being a local to an area, makes someone conflicted for writing entries about subjects in one's own local area ?

That is manifestly absurd. Jack4576 (talk) 17:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG and ORG. Sources in the article are primary promo, keep vote provides no sources and multiple editors BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 08:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.