Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ndayizeye Emmanuel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ndayizeye Emmanuel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only relatively good source is this but it is an interview hence not independent of him. He won a non notable award (Made in Rwanda Awards) hence doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR. A before search shows subject lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. This appears to be a case of borderline/bare notability. Subject is also a musician but doesn’t satisfy any criterion from WP:SINGER. Celestina007 (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't satisfy WP:NACTOR. Balle010 (talk) 02:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Article does not meet GNG, BASIC or NACTOR. BEFORE showed only promos, mentions, etc. Notability and sourcing guidelines should be strictly followed for BLPs. // Timothy :: talk 02:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Fails notability requirements, although could be a case of WP:TOOSOON, and/or a reflection of the nature of Rwanda's RS media as much as of his own lack of notability. All the same, should be deleted. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Alex-h (talk) 07:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable Devokewater (talk) 14:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.