Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Aro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 08:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Aro[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, the guy played, as far as I know, exactly one world cup game and recived virtually no coverage for it. He doesn't even have a portugese wiki entry. Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 14:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep [1] and [2] and [3] all look like WP:SIGCOV. I would recommend withdrawing the nomination. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have fleshed out the article with those sources plus some more I found since. What do you think, @Govvy:? Robby.is.on (talk) 21:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He played for a few top teams in Brazil, Robby pointed to a few sources, but I would like to see a bit more for my liking. Govvy (talk) 18:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per sources provided by @Robby.is.on. The athlete also had notable spells at SC Internacional, Lecce and Leixões. Svartner (talk) 07:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per improvements, just squeezes by WP:BASIC for me, cheers. Govvy (talk) 10:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per Govvy's rationale. Orig nom here: with the changes this does seem to squeeze by WP:GNG now (i.e. a WP:HEY). Although I'm not sure about [1] being independent, given he's a journo intern with a close relationship with the subject. Allan Nonymous (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

he's a journo intern with a close relationship with the subject Where did you glean that information from? Robby.is.on (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I read the article. Allan Nonymous (talk) 19:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I did, too, albeit through a translation service. I couldn't find any signs that the writer of the article had a close relationship with the subject, only that they were a supervised intern ("Estagiário, colaborou sob a supervisão de Heitor Esmeriz"). Robby.is.on (talk) 00:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I didn't see that those were quotes. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above which show notability. Giant Snowman 14:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep relevant from my point of view --Acartonadooopo (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources and per an extensive professional career. Clearly notable. Anwegmann (talk) 00:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.