Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kabomania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 19:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kabomania[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing significant coverage. Per WP:SIGCOV: ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail". WP:BEFORE revealed nothing beyond WP:ROUTINE, run of the mill type coverage, nothing that would contribute to demonstrating WP:N. // Timothy :: talk 18:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 18:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 18:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 20:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; I would say merge/redirect but I'm not convinced that any of the content is worth retaining and it doesn't appear to be a likely search term either Spiderone 20:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable; of the three references, one is FB, another doesn't work. I would have said merge to Persikabo 1973, but not without proper sources, obvs. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.