Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny McNulty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . ✗plicit 23:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danny McNulty[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

If you came here because of this Reddit post, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was a recurring character (not main cast) in two notable television shows. However, notability is not inherited. What little coverage I can find is either not significant, not independant, or from an unreliable source. Due to his recent guest appearance on a podcast, there has been some recent articles about McNulty, however they mostly just quote him and summarize what he said. -- Mike 🗩 18:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator and WP:GNG. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 18:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Beyond articles confirming he was returning as a cast member in the sequel, there are not articles about him. His role was bit part regardless, so not at ACTOR nor GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 18:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable actor in multiple network series. Well-known to millions. Megainek (talk) 02:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Source in article is an promo, and BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk 06:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.