Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine Jian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concubine Jian[edit]

Concubine Jian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge and Redirect to Jiaqing Emperor. WP:NOTEVERYTHING and article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. My WP:BEFORE turned up nothing. Similar article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine En was recently redirected.   // Timothy :: talk  04:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  04:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  04:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Merge to Concubines of the Jiaqing Emperor. I expect there will be some more information about at least some of these women. The material as it stands isn’t enough to support a series of stand-alone articles but there is enough for a single article with a couple of paras in each of them.Mccapra (talk) 08:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

reator requests the article be moved to Draftspace to continue development — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deidonata (talkcontribs) 09:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draft per the request of the article creator. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify since the creator believes that with more work, notability can be shown. Mccapra (talk) 05:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.