Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher John Fields

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 17:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher John Fields[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a theatre director, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for theatre directors. The main notability claim on offer here is that his work exists, which isn't "inherently" notable without WP:GNG-worthy coverage about it, but the sole footnote offers a blurb's worth of information about him in the process of being fundamentally about something else, which isn't enough to get him over GNG all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 15:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and California. Bearcat (talk) 15:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to insufficiency of reference citations. The one reference cited about him being asked to step down is relatively minor - that incident does not seem to merit notability in of itself. The inclusion of the termination of the theatre position even seems to be an attempt to defame him some, because of its insufficiency as a good reference.WmLawson (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP. One reliable source is not by definition significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of WP:RS citations and unable to demonstrate meeting WP:GNG guidelines. Go4thProsper (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.