Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian and Joseph Cousins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christian and Joseph Cousins[edit]

Christian and Joseph Cousins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub BLP about twin brothers who were child actors. Neither twin appears to be notable. I cannot find more than brief mentions in reliable sources. Schazjmd (talk) 13:38, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete imdb urls are not enough for inclusion into wikipedia, but a proper searching for reliable sources might help. --VertyBerty (talk) 08:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep Some critical notice of the pair 30 yrs on, [1] and [2]. Gsearch news brings up several articles about the pair. Oaktree b (talk) 14:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That yahoo source ([2]) provides a bit of bio info, but the bloody-disgusting.com ([1]) ref is a single sentence mentioning the twins. Schazjmd (talk) 15:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I've added the yahoo ref to the article and revised the content to match the source. So far this is the only RS in the article. Schazjmd (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Further coverage from Looper [3]. Oaktree b (talk) 18:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, @Oaktree b, I've added both sources to the article. I still don't think the twins are notable, but at least the article is in slightly better shape now and, if kept, has refs. Schazjmd (talk) 14:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in the article and BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subjects directly and indepth meeting BLPs requirement for strong sourcing.
[4], interview in an article about Schwarzenegger
[5] where are they now with interview quotes from subject.
Ping me if sources meeting WP:BLP are found.  // Timothy :: talk  09:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.