Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Okagbue (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎ no consensus. Many of the arguments here lacked depth beyond an assertion of passing or failing notability guidelines. I agree with Uhai that the arguments on the keep side were superficial, but at the same time I don't think that a refutation of the sources that are in the article has been made by the "delete" side either. I have made a cursory review of the first few sources which relate to his winning (not just appearing) in the Gulder Ultimate Search program, and an interview with Punch magazine. These go beyond mere passing mentions, but many of the sources further down the list are only a mention of Okagbue as a cast member. There is certainly a basis here for further discussion, but since this has been on "final relist" for over a week, I am calling this a no consensus for the time being. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Okagbue[edit]

Chris Okagbue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same as last AFD. Appeared on a reality show, acted in a few films, but nothing big and has a few mentions in Nigerian publications but nothing that meets RS or GNG. Doesn't meet notability and not enough has been done to improve article since last deletion. Nswix (talk) 19:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The WordsmithTalk to me 21:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Everyone who appears on a reality show anywhere in the word does not automatically qualify under WP:GNG and WP:Notability guidelines. This article does not appear to justify keeping based on those criterion. Go4thProsper (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thirty movies and multiple TV series are a bit more than "a reality show". Owen× 20:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Quantity of work is irrelevant if the works are not notable or if his roles are insignificant, per WP:NACTOR. Uhai (talk) 04:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Weakly passes WP:NACTOR. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:ACTOR states "person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions"
    Which multiple films has this person acted in, that are notable? Nswix (talk) 02:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Per all above. Extensive work as an actor. Svartner (talk) 02:31, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NACTOR. None of the keep votes here have bothered to point out any of his credits that are notable and in which he has a significant role per this notability criteria. I didn't go through his every credit but I sampled a lot of them and the work is either non-notable or his roles are insignificant, as best as I can tell, aside from Lotanna—though I have doubts if even this film is notable. The reality show appearance and coverage isn't enough to claim notability. Uhai (talk) 04:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.