Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carden Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Carden Method. Black Kite (t) (c) 17:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carden Academy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertisement Sempermithrandir (talk) 18:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Mission Viejo, California#Education per usual practice for private, elementary schools. TerriersFan (talk) 02:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ (See below) Non-notable private elementary school. Do not redirect to Mission Viejo or any other location, because the name "Carden Academy" is not unique; Google finds a dozen "Carden Academy" schools in multiple states. --MelanieN (talk) 14:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Convert to disambiguation page, which I have done. Cunard (talk) 21:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Changing my opinion to Keep per Cunard's change to a disambiguation page. Good thinking, Cunard. --MelanieN (talk) 02:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The conversion to a disambiguation page is only useful if any of the individually listed entities has their own Wikipedia article. As none of them do, the disambiguation page is useless. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Carden Method. I agree with WikiDan61 above. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - while a disambiguation page is better than what had been here, this one violates the guidelines for dab pages (MOS:DAB). The only useful content it could point to is the Carden Method page. It would be different if the blue links for each city had info on these listed academies, but they don't and probably shouldn't. If one of the individual academies proves notable, then maybe recreate the dab page. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:56, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Caden Method per RHaworth. No one seems to be in favor of maintaing this as a separate page, and since there are multiple Carden Academies, a redirect to the method would seem to be most likely to provide relevant, notable content to the searcher. Deletion is inappropriate as at minimum the title is a reasonable search term. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 13:16, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.