Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Sterling-Vete (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Brian Sterling-Vete[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Brian Sterling-Vete (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Is this person notable? I notice that this page has been deleted via Afd (and the page consists of the same info as before —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bihco (talk • contribs) 14:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as clearly notable; this page needs massive editing work to redact the hagiography but the individual himself is notable. JJL (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Ick, all of those links need to become wikilinked (as some of them go to Wiki articles) and the rest converted to references, with a number of them being removed completely. But he does appear to meet notability standards, it's just a really ugly article. SilverserenC 20:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. SilverserenC 20:05, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Hopefully, some other members of the squadron can clean this up. SilverserenC 20:05, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay... okay. I'll see if I can pretty it up tonight. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.