Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Sterling-Vete
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Independent, significant coverage doesn't seem to be there. Chick Bowen 02:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Brian Sterling-Vete[edit]
- Brian Sterling-Vete (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Motivational speaker, etc. Promotional article written by his agent. Is he notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. COI article on an uncredited extra for a few television shows. No reliable sources to back up any of the other claims, and I doubt there are any, as per a News search and a Books search. --T B C ♣§♠ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 13:04, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. However indicative, Google is not the lynchpin to go by. Simply perusing a few links given in the article reveals this and this, where the subject certainly has received non-trivial independent coverage, establishing notability. WilliamH (talk) 15:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete per WP:N Only 15 hits on him on Google. Artene50 (talk) 00:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please consider Wikipedia:GOOGLEHITS, thanks. WilliamH (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I'm unsure myself, but the web searches above obviously focused on "Brian Sterling-Vete", whereas he was and still is usually credited as "Brian Sterling". Film work seems not notable enough by itself, and I wouldn't consider the two links WilliamH quoted to be "significant coverage" either ... OTOH he has lots of smaller halfway notable things listed, albeit the majority isn't sourced. Hmm. --Amalthea (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.