Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algeria at the 1997 World Championships in Athletics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Algeria at the World Athletics Championships. Please do not take action on an article being discussed until the AFD has been closed. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Algeria at the 1997 World Championships in Athletics[edit]

Algeria at the 1997 World Championships in Athletics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. A draftification was contested. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect as ATD. Mccapra (talk) 13:40, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge All the information in this article (if we can call it that) is available in the World Athletics Championships Statistics Handbook, which is already included in the sources at Algeria at the World Athletics Championships. All the information can be merged into that article as covered by its citation. SFB 14:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've gone ahead and merged the material, given the previous deletion discussion on this, so recommend we just close this as merged. The material in the history was cited and appropriate. I think we all could have saved quite a bit of time here if we took that approach in the first place, which is what has previously been recommended in past discussions on this type of small delegation article. SFB 15:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.