Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidin Ardjomandi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 01:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aidin Ardjomandi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I failed to find any significant reliable coverage online. Fails GNG and other relevant subjective notability criteria Mardetanha (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: At first I don't agree with your word "any significant reliable". Reputable news agencies such as Khabaronline, Fararu, Tabnak and Hamshahri Online have covered the news of receiving his A'Design Award. If you have information about prestigious industrial design competitions in the world, for example A'Design Award - that is most prestigious world design award 1-, Design that Educates, IDA Design Award and so many, you will find that Aidin Ardjomandi is a member of the jury in many of them. An advantage that few industrial designers in Iran have.

For example, in Design that Educates 2021 competition, he is a member of the jury along with Hadi Teherani and Farshid Moussavi - two of the most prestigious Iranian architects and industrial designers in the world.

The invention of an instrument called the Cellorido, which won a world award, is another of his notability criteria.

~~I think it is better to review the sources again and keep this article. MrInfo2012 Talk 11:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

Blocked for WP:UPE. MER-C 15:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per MrInfo2012. Seems sufficient coverage to me. Ford MF (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam, creator blocked as a confirmed spammer based on off-wiki evidence. MER-C 15:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a place for other editors to review this evidence themselves? Ford MF (talk) 21:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NCREATIVE. // Timothy :: t | c | a 04:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.