Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 27[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 27, 2023.

(month) 0[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 4#(month) 0

List of number of chrmosomes of various organisms[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was an unlikely formulation even without the misspelling of "chromosomes". BD2412 T 19:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 12:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unlikely search term + misspelling. The search bar takes you to the right page with this wording anyways. ― Synpath 19:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Campaigns against the Fatimids[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-specific redirect: Campaigns by whom? The Aghlabids, Abbasids, Qarmatians, Byzantines, Seljuks, Crusaders and others all fought against the Fatimids. Constantine ✍ 15:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. See also my edit summary here, for context. R Prazeres (talk) 15:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Com.ss.android.ugc.aweme[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on a Google search, this topic is related to TikTok, but it is not named in the article. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Just because a thing relates to another thing does not warrant a redirect. There does not seem to be any sort of coverage from major sources either. Yoblyblob (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 02:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above; unlikely and unhelpful search term. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Mock Aftrologer[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely typo (from The Mock Astrologer) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dirk presser[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing this is an unlikely typo or mispronunciation? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete non-capitalization, misspellings, implausible misspellings for a redirect Yoblyblob (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It's phonetically correct, and will lead anyone with a passing interest to this actor's page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiptopper (talk • contribs) 15:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, does not appear to be phonetically correct (in regards to presser vs Passer) and seems to be a wholly unlikely search term for this subject. Utopes (talk / cont) 14:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for 3 errors. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Volufiline[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 4#Volufiline

Arya (term)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 14:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bundle with Arya (word) and Aryan (term) -- no pages link here. If someone wants to link to "Arya", it goes to the same place as all three redirects (Aryan). There's no need for these disambiguations. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep all. Just wanted to let it be known that these redirects are all tagged as R from unnecessary disambigations. I think they're all useful. Also note that we have Aryan (word) as well, not created by me and it has existed since 2009. Nervelita :3🏳️‍⚧️ (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note I've tagged the other three redirects mentioned and added them to this nomination. Thryduulf (talk) 14:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all. The target article is about a word or term that is rendered as either "Arya" or "Aryan", and these are useful and harmless {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} redirects, especially since Aryan (disambiguation) exists disambiguating a large number of other uses of "Arya" and "Aryan". Thryduulf (talk) 14:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all per harmless and Thryduulf Yoblyblob (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ottoblob[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Community jargon for the videogame Europa Universalis IV that's not fit to be mentioned on Wikipedia. Doesn't appear to have any alternate usage. Randi🦋TalkContribs 12:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redirect creator per prior discussion; I was actually going to nominate this today. — Knightoftheswords 15:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beastforum.com[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is for a pornography website that is not named on the target article. Although the article is about zoophilia, I don't think it's necessary to have an unnamed porn site redirect to it. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Nothing in WP:RPURPOSE even remotely supports this. AndyTheGrump (talk) 07:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 08:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The website was mentioned at the time the redirect was created in 2015, but mention was removed by Drmies in January 2020. Over 3.5 years is more than long enough for that to be regarded as stable and without any mention this redirect helps nobody. Thryduulf (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: unhelpful to the reader. Edward-Woodrow (JWB) Talk to me here! 18:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mixrecord[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard of this alternative name, nor was I able to find anything online about it. Unlikely to be useful. Deauthorized. (talk) 21:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep, as it still seems to be accurate description as a device used for recording. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 05:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I don't think this is meant to refer to a device, as Utopes infers, but rather a mixtape on vinyl (and hence not on tape). Google shows extraordinarily little using this apparent neologism. SilverLocust 💬 06:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: seemingly little used neologism as SilverLocust said, and I doubt its usefulness as a redirect to that page given the lack of usage/definition. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 06:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion seems to be leaning towards deletion. Relisting for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chechclear[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 5#Chechclear

Chandrayaan-6[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect created by a now banned sockmaster. From my searches on and off Wikipedia, there does not seem to be a Chandrayaan-6. Only 1, 2 and 3 have existed, and 4 is newsworthy for being currently planned. Haven't looked much into 5 per se, but 6 is definitely not mentioned anywhere at the target page, and does not seem to be discussed in current newsmedia. Appears to be a possible case of WP:TOOSOON. (#5 may be a similar story as well.) Utopes (talk / cont) 07:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore and list at AFD. As a redirect I think it's fine, it directs to the most relevant content we have even if there's no information on this mission specifically. But the article was WP:BLAR'd only a couple weeks after creation, and I think this has made an unintentional end-run around the article deletion process. The creator was not banned when the article was created so WP:G5 does not apply, and beyond that, whether or not the article should have remained should have been decided by a proper deletion discussion. The "chandrayaan.com" page used as a reference (which is not an official ISRO page) lists future missions including 5 and 6, but also says that its source is Wikipedia and our article currently does not mention any future missions. Various more reliable sources indicate that more Chandrayaan missions are planned, with a goal at least of a sample return mission, but I don't see any sources for how many more are planned, even speculatively. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'd rather skip the bureaucracy of deferring this decision to AfD, as there really is nothing in reliable sources that would contribute to creating an article. You'd have about as much luck trying to find significant coverage for Apollo 24. I don't think Footy2000 was entirely right to blank and redirect the page without consensus, but I do see why they did it. As for the redirect itself, it discourages article creation if the mission does end up being planned or carried out in the future. Also, it's not mentioned at the target — again, probably because of the nonexistence of sources. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There was a discussion on the talk page where we arrived at a consensus prior to taking the step. Regardless, Chandrayaan-4 is still in planning phase and not an official name, let alone Chandraayan-5 and 6. Number of pages had been created on speculations which fell under WP:CRYSTALBALL.Footy2000♡; 04:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per TechnoSquirrel69. It was fully unsourced speculation. Jay 💬 09:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_October_27&oldid=1183825521"