Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 23[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 23, 2020.

Jamaica (the country)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 02:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed disambiguator; should be Jamaica (country). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xamayca[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 02:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non sequitur misspelling. Note that Jamaica is not a Spanish-speaking country. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mexicanx[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 1#Mexicanx

Cyberspace Administration[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous title. The "Cyberspace Administration" could refer to various topics beyond the administration of China. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I can't find any use which doesn't relate to the PRC (Google search string 'Cyberspace Administration -china'). Narky Blert (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I created the redirect. Almost all mentions of 'Cyberspace Administration' mean 'Cyberspace Administration of China' but many use alternative forms, such as 'China's Cyberspace Administration' or 'the national cyberspace administration', which a searcher might well reduce to the two words but would be less likely to construct the full four-word name. Therefore the redirect is useful. I do note that other, province-level, cyberspace adminstrations exist within China (eg. here), but they are a rarity and not yet mentioned in WP. The term is seemingly not applied outside of China. One day, someone may turn 'Cyberspace Administration' or 'Cyberspace administration' (lower-case a) into a disambig page, but for now it does a good job. - Onanoff (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iorn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Deryck C. 13:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I gave this one the benefit of doubt because of pageviews, but now I suspect that those users are looking for something else. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:51, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Homophonic with Jorn and Yorn, therefore ambiguous as to what Iorn is a misspelling of. Narky Blert (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate. There used to be only two potential targets for "Iorn", being Iorn Uldbjerg and Elizabeth Iorns, (as well as a mention at Erin that "Iorn" is a variant of the name). However, over the last 1 1/2 to 2 hours, I translated my first article of Iorn Pio from the Danish Wikipedia to the English Wikipedia so that there would be three viable targets and enough to disambiguate. It was exceptionally difficult because I don't speak Danish. Logical typos can be listed in a "See Also" section. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per Utopes. signed, Rosguill talk 20:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per User:Utopes. Paintspot Infez (talk) 03:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

How to be gangster[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ungrammatical WP:HOWTO redirect. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:40, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jewish Maoism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While Jewish Maoism would logically belong under the larger umbrella of the Jewish left, there's no discussion of it at the article, and I couldn't find relevant discussion elsewhere, so this will probably disappoint readers. BDD (talk) 21:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it makes any sense. The Jewish Left makes sense because there have been left-wing Jewish organizations and Jewish people who joined left-wing parties and remained a self-identified group within them, often publishing Yiddish language periodicals and holding meetings in Yiddish. But while some Jews no doubt became Maoists in the 1960s, there was no Jewish Maoism, just Maoists who happened to be Jewish. TFD (talk) 23:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think what TFD said makes sense. Is Jewish Maoism a thing? A quick Google search gives just forum chat bullshit like Maybe Zionism is the Jewish Maoism in the sense you suggest. or A Jew trying to make Jews into Chinese to cover up for Jewish Maoism. LOL. --MarioGom (talk) 09:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TFD and MarioGom. There's no such concept. פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her (talk) 13:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - As stated above, this seems worthless. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Racial homogeneity[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I'm interpreting CoffeeWithMarket's call to write a new article about the concept as a delete vote, making this unanimous. signed, Rosguill talk 20:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking for a discussion of racial/ethnic homogeneity and a list or discussion of which countries have more or less racial and ethnic diversity. The closest thing I've been able to find to that is Monoethnicity, but race isn't necessarily same as ethnicity, so I don't know if that's a suitable target. At this point, I'd be ok with retargeting there or deleting. (Note that the section this redirect targets is no longer there.) BDD (talk) 21:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - This appears as if it needs to be its own conceptual article. There are at least three fundamental questions worth pondering. One: what exactly is 'race' in terms of a social construct today, given all that we know about human development? Two: what would make a racial group 'homogeneous' in the broad sense since, of course, people aren't milk and the definition of the term is vague? Three: given that racial groups vary in terms of the ease of which individuals are or aren't accepted into its fold, what effects are there on the lives of real people, positive or negative, of the relative homogeneity of their race? I'd be astonished if there aren't reliable sources looking at these matters from a scholarly perspective. Yes, the topic is emotionally loaded and politically radioactive, but it's also well studied. I think. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation. I agree with CoffeeWithMarkets in that reliable sources discussing this topic shouldn't be impossible to find. Not a very active user (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

(disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could equally link to WP:DAB or Disambiguation, WP:XY. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A case exactly to my point (and fixed before I saw it). Fair old bit of vandalism going on in Sanjeev Kumar by the sight of it, including a change of DoB from 1938 to 1998. Wbm1058 looks to be on top of that. Narky Blert (talk) 23:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dab page[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Retarget to WP:DAB. I see no other meanings of DAB that include pages. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per nom. Fortunately, the result of that 2010 discussion is not binding precedent. Narky Blert (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename to DAB page. Only capitalizing the D makes it look like the article creator is talking about dabbing. OcelotCreeper (talk) 22:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I created the page I recommended Dab page could be renamed to. OcelotCreeper (talk) 02:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not a good enough case for a cross-domain redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

$cientology[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Satiric misspelling#Currency signs. signed, Rosguill talk 21:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we need a satiric misspelling for any purpose. See also [[1]]. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kase (disambigation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete WP:SNOW -- JHunterJ (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in disambiguative qualifier. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What does the phrase "disambiguative qualifier" mean please? S a g a C i t y (talk) 19:52, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Saga City: The user means that the typo in the redirect comes from the word "disambiguation". OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@OcelotCreeper: Comment: Pings only work when added in the same edit as the signature. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So just fix it - I can't see why this is being discussed here. S a g a C i t y (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See Template:R from unnecessary disambiguation. I remembered a similar wording to be used somewhere, now found the source. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Thanks for explaining how pinging works, this is my first ping where someone hadn't pinged me first in the same conversation. OcelotCreeper (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm happy to fix these, if somebody throws the "page mover" right my way. Dr. Vogel (talk) 20:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That comment shows why you should not be getting page mover thrown your way. See WP:MOVEREDIRECT for an explanation why it is generally advisable not to move redirects. -- Tavix (talk) 20:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • How exactly would this right help with deleting these pages? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sorry, I misread what the problem was. I thought it was just the case of moving them to the titles with the correct spelling. Was just trying to be helpful. Dr. Vogel (talk) 20:35, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all — Each of these targets has a correctly spelled version. These misspelled redirects are not (and should not) be used in article-space links, and are highly unlikely to be typed into a search. — Gorthian (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per WP:RDAB. User:DPL bot flags links through misspelt (disambiguation) qualifiers as WP:INTDAB errors. To DABfixers, they're a pest. (re-signing) Narky Blert (talk) 13:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merged nominations of such redirects from moves now as well and left the discussions (which were mostly only the nomination description) as a comment. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per WP:RDAB. Not helpful for searches, and not helpful for repairing links to disambiguation pages. Hog Farm (talk) 23:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Holdfast Bay (disambigation) and Coomalie (disambigaution) as I originally created these complete with spelling errors. Cowdy001 (talk) 00:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Damayanti (disambiguaton). This redirect was left over from when I recently moved that page to the correct spelling of "disambiguation," and seems like search bar clutter now. Regards, SONIC678 01:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible, I've tagged the one I created for G7 also. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:06, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as implausible typos; these really should have been speedied under R3 at the time they were redirected to the correct spellings. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 18:06, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Antonio j pietro[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 17:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The company's exec is Antonio Pietri. Misspelling + miscapitalization seems like far enough of an edit distance to justify deletion, if not speedy deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Paza (disambiuation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was merged into other nomination (preserving the little discussion that started here) (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in disambiguative qualifier, although existed as R from move for over five years. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @1234qwer1234qwer4: You incorporated this into the group above. It shouldn’t be listed twice, but I’m not sure what should be done with this entry. — Gorthian (talk) 22:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah, it's double-listed. Might be best if the nominator closes this one as a procedural close. Hog Farm (talk) 23:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shaken baby syndrom[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:03, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a misspelled redirect, especially since this overshadows the correctly spelled Shaken baby syndrome in the search box. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. This isn't even WP:CHEAP, and might confuse readers who don't know the word 'syndrome'. Narky Blert (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not sure about deletion due to the redirect working phonetically since the e in syndrome is silent and therefore the word sounds like syn drom. I also noticed that Syndrom redirects to Syndrome since late 2018 due to the creator believing forgetting the e in syndrome was a common misspelling.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, before anyone asks the redirects were created by different people.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

JohnAbbott[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for CamelCase here. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as {{R with history}} dating back to 2001. As I understand it, these are usually kept as "relics" and to preserve (i.e. not break) links, for example on Nostalgia Wikipedia, where CamelCase titles are the norm. ComplexRational (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, this is page #565. No reason to delete here. -- Tavix (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: old camelcase (WP:CAMEL) redirects to articles should be kept because their histories have archival value and their titles are not implausible as typo variants. – Uanfala (talk) 01:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pennfylvania[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:03, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Failed attemmpt at inserting a long s, i.e. Pennſylvania. Same user created two other redirects listed below. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, improbable. Hog Farm (talk) 23:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Miſſpelled archaiſm. Narky Blert (talk) 00:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Thiſe is not the 18th century. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 05:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep, because Pennsylvania was around in the 18th century. Nyttend (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • The long s is a different character than the one found in the redirect (an f). It's one thing to have redirects for archaisms, it's another to have redirects for misspelled archaisms. Hog Farm (talk) 02:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not an obvious misspelling. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Unneceſsary redirect, implausible misspelling - Flori4nKT A L K 17:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

EPnnsylvania[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:03, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miscapitalized and implausibly misspelled. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oregroun[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Norse Dakota[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not even close to plausible. Created by a MascotGuy sock. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

State of new yourk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miscapitalized and misspelled. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:51, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xichigan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Supposedly a non-neutral nickname for Michigan, but not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:47, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Apparently this refers to the Ohio State / Michigan rivalry lead to the state using "X"s in place of "M"s as a derogatory way of crossing out the "M".[2] Utopes (talk / cont) 02:12, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Utopes' link, provided that it isn't used frequently every single time a game between those two states comes up. --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 02:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless mentioned in article: a user will not find any information about the term at the target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:31, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lwizyana[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre misspelling. Is this a WP:FORRED, by any chance? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

NCoV (SARS)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 21:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:XY. From what understood from Novel coronavirus, nCoV is used for strains and not species. In this case, the title could refer to SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Conditional keep: Do articles exist for either one of the aforementioned subjects? If not, "keep" would be the default choice here. Steel1943 (talk) 20:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is an implausible search term, and not mentioned on the current target. And to answer Steel1943’s question, yes they do exist, as one caused SARS and the other is causing the current pandemic. --awkwafaba (📥) 14:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • ...FWIW, that did not answer my question as no Wikipedia article was linked in your response. Steel1943 (talk) 15:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The target article prominently describes both strains, so WP:XY is satisfied. -- Tavix (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I've notified WP:MED.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

INdiana[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Consensus is weaker for INdiana than MInnesota, but ultimately I still see a consensus to delete both. signed, Rosguill talk 21:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miscapitalization typo similar to previously-deleted ones like LEad and UNited States. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Added a similar redirect. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No need at all for these when typing the word into the search bar in lowercase and hitting Enter gets you to the correct article. Narky Blert (talk) 19:01, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Narky Blert's point. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, because you're completely ignoring everyone who goes to URLs. Try going to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INdiana and see what happens when this is deleted. And don't impose your search strategy on other people. Nyttend (talk) 22:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anybody can make a typo when filling out a URL. That does not, though, mean that we need to have redirects for every typo imaginable for our URL typing friends. We have redirects for common, plausible typos. Utopes (talk / cont) 15:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete per nom. People do occasionally double capitalize by holding the shift key, but the redirect is still unnecessary from my perspective. Utopes (talk / cont) 15:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A unnecessary redirect for a typographical error (if you're searching using URLs you need to be more careful: we can't possibly have redirects for every typo, or even for every miscapitalisation of a second letter). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:29, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Week keep (INdiana only) INdiana may not always be a typo. Lots of state government websites use the capital IN styling for various things. See for example Healthy Rivers INitiative, or the JustIN controversy from the end of Mike Pence's term as governor. I can see someone seeing an IN styling somewhere and typing INdiana into Wikipedia or Google. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Haiwaii[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 20:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly the most plausible misspellings, though a far cry from Uthium below. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Connnecticut[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 20:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No word in the English language has three or more consecutive repetitions of a letter. This is not Kashyyyk. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. (Ok so what's a Necticut, then?) But the redirect is to cater for a misspelling, and one that is quite plausible. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: took me two or three looks to identify the typo, so either I'm incredibly slow or the typo is plausible. "Connecticut" is a difficult word to spell (though admittedly for reasons unrelated to the "n"s). – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elaska[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 20:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elaska? Who would search this? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Uraniam[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling, could also refer to Uranian or anything at the corresponding DAB. See also the RfD for Indiam. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Uninunium[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelled systematic names. Far fewer views than the correctly spelled Unununium and Ununoctium. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as implausible – nothing that I see suggests these misspellings will be particularly likely. ComplexRational (talk) 18:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete implausible and possibly misleading. Redirecting to a target from blatantly incorrect names where the confusion doesn't widely exist can perpetuate errors. Hog Farm (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Astaine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't sound particularly plausible, since it's missing the second T. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Plantium[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't sound particularly plausible, unlike Plantinum or the more-viewed Platnium. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bromeen[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 30#Bromeen

Sulvere[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This one doesn't seem particularly plausible, either. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: This word is the Sanskrit word from which the name of this element might have originated (the other being the Latin "sulfurium," as shown by sources found with Google search). Regards, SONIC678 17:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as WP:RFFL, no particular affinity to Sanskrit. Narky Blert (talk) 18:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can see someone's finger slipping off the F and onto the V, but "ere" is very implausible. --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 18:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - implausible typo, Narky suggests it's Sanskrit (WP:RFFL, and Google translate suggests Western Frisian for silver. Hog Farm (talk) 23:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Uthium[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 30#Uthium

Kumagai Morikazu[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Note that unless there is content worth preserving in the page's history, voting to convert to an article is a vote to delete the redirect. signed, Rosguill talk 20:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a soft redirect to the Japanese article about this person, who appears to have been an early 20th century Japanese painter. I don't believe interlanguage redirects are appropriate in article space, however there is no speedy deletion criteria that applies. This should either be replaced by an English language article or deleted. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless someone decides to create an article. The redirect as is isn’t helpful because even if an average English Wikipedia user had an interest in this person they wouldn’t be a fluent enough reader of Japanese to get any use out of the redirect.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 17:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, and I would argue that A3 does apply. It's an external link, not a redirect. —Xezbeth (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Convert into an article so users of the English Wikipedia can learn about this individual. Regards, SONIC678 17:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion should be open for seven days so there is still time to do so before deletion and even if not ann article could still be created after the deletion occurs.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I boldly moved this to Draft, but I should have seen the notice and commented here instead; I have no complaints if it needs to be moved back for procedural reasons. I was also unsure of what CSD might fit and appreciate User:Xezbeth's argument. I have no prejudice against an English article if notability can be shown, but a soft redirect to the Japanese Wiki doesn't seem appropriate. If discussion turns to keep, I suggest a soft redirect to wikidata:Q11568738, since it can be read in English and link to all other projects that have content. —Ost (talk) 16:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Ost316:. I've reverted your move per WP:MOVEREDIRECT. I'm not sure I see why moving the redirect to draftspace makes any sense. You mentioned in the move log it's because it's undersourced—but it's not an article so there naturally wouldn't be any sources. -- Tavix (talk) 00:59, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • The undersourced portion is that standard message with the Draft tool, which still seemed valid on a page with no content that I thought was likely a placeholder until the article was created. I should have been more clear that that was my assumption. If the intention is a permanent soft redirect, then I don't think that the page is appropriate. —Ost (talk) 16:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unless there is an appropriate local page to retarget this to. Sending readers to non-English content is not helpful. Additionally, the plain soft redirect template is not used in the mainspace. Precedents: Mohamed Chabani|, Saint Michel Boulevard, and Bonne Nuit les Petits. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stamatina Kanellopoulou and Iakovos Koumis[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 30#Stamatina Kanellopoulou and Iakovos Koumis

(disambiguation) (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was 'delete WP:SNOW -- JHunterJ (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why anyone would look for a page using "disambiguation" twice other than to search for Disambiguation (disambiguation), which lists uses for the term "disambiguation," leaning delete on these two redirects. Regards, SONIC678 05:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:RDAB. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 06:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Notice the misspellings on the nominated redirects. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 08:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete obvious typos. Surprised these weren't speedied. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as completely implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Delete) (Delete) - First for the duplicate disambiguator, and for the fact that the top one contains a spelling error, and the bottom one a missing ). Doubly meets WP:RDAB. Hog Farm (talk) 02:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Aulus Plautius (dismabiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete WP:SNOW -- JHunterJ (talk) 22:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was left over from a page move to the correct spelling of "disambiguation," and the link to there in Aulus Plautius was changed to reflect this move. As per the outcome of an earlier discussion concerning four redirects with this misspelling of "disambiguation", this should also be deleted. Regards, SONIC678 05:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:RDAB. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 06:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Don't see any reason to keep it. P Aculeius (talk) 13:35, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete agreed. feminist (talk) 14:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. We should be highly reluctant to delete redirects created by pagemoves, but the page was at this title for only a few days, so it's very unlikely to have gotten a significant number of links that still persist. Nyttend (talk) 22:40, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No links in the articlespace but presumably this wasn't in the incorrect place long enough for it to accumulate links in old revisions or in outside webpages. Hog Farm (talk) 02:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hobbit calendar redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, didn't see the table (non-admin closure) Hog Farm (talk) 13:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor fictional calendar entry no longer mentioned in target article. Delete as clutter. Hog Farm (talk) 02:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - all of these remain in the table of the months in the named section. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Green Hill Country[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 30#Green Hill Country

The Ivy Bush[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn, I'm fine with the sourced mention (non-admin closure) Hog Farm (talk) 14:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Middle-earth inn no longer mentioned in articles, and no attribution issues with deletion, as it has always been a redirect. Deletion would be preferable so we don't give readers the impression content exists on this subject. Hog Farm (talk) 02:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, again these are details but colourful and useful ones, as Tolkien intentionally made the Shire homely and English. For instance he drank in The Ivy Bush on Hagley Road, Birmingham. I've added a small section to this effect, with refs, in Shire (Middle-earth)#Homely names (so we need to retarget the section names of the redirects). Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Winterfilth[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn, didn't see the table (non-admin closure) Hog Farm (talk) 13:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obscure fictional calendar item, no longer mentioned in the target article and it's removal not challenged. Also, there's doesn't appear to be a page about filth in the winter to target to. Hog Farm (talk) 02:35, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - remains in table of the months in the named section. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Afterlithe[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn, didn't see the table, not going to waste editor time here (non-admin closure) Hog Farm (talk) 13:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obscure fictional month where the content has been removed from the target page and said removal was not challenged. No longer necessary, as the lack of coverage of this subject will only be confusing to readers. Hog Farm (talk) 02:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - remains in table of the months in the named section. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bill Blythe IV[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clinton was born as William Blythe III, not William Blythe IV. Delete as from incorrect name. Hog Farm (talk) 02:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete no evidence that he is often mistakenly referred to as Blythe IV.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Wow (talk) 02:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator, he's William Blythe III, not William Blythe IV. JIP | Talk 23:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to prevent any spread of misinformation. -2pou (talk) 18:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ben Nyaumbe[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 30#Ben Nyaumbe

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_23&oldid=948559242"