Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 6, 2017.

C7BK[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, R3. -- Tavix (talk) 14:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that these are valid abbreviations. Steel1943 (talk) 22:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete recently created and implausible. As abbreviations of "chapter 7/13 bankruptcy", these are totally unattested in reliable sources. Even in the few unreliable sources where these abbreviations are found (webforums, blogs, and such), there's almost always a space before "BK". 59.149.124.29 (talk) 03:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete implausible Cabayi (talk) 10:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible. These do not follow any standard convention (at least that I am aware of) for abbreviating the U.S. Code. Also, FYI, these were created by a user (C7BK) whose page reads (in its entirety) "I am a Wikipedia vandal." -- Notecardforfree (talk) 14:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pure vandalism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be used significantly. Implausible.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  05:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Death of Jeffrey Miller[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 04:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More than one subject at the disambiguation page Jeffrey Miller has died. Steel1943 (talk) 03:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep And how many of them are world-famous because of the manner in which they died? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • The ability of that question's answer to affect this redirect is questionable, given that the redirect is ambiguous. Also, I skimmed through a few of the pages in the "article" namespace starting with "Death of", and I am currently unable to find a title where the subject that comes after "Death of" is ambiguous. Steel1943 (talk) 03:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • That's just not true. Surely more than one person named Diana has died, yet we have Death of Diana. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 15:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • Okay... my use of "...a few..." shows that I did not claim that I was 100% sure I was correct. In fact, that example is probably one of the few (if not the only) exceptions. Steel1943 (talk) 20:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Looking over the Jeffrey Miller disambiguation page, only one other non-living person is there: J. C. P. Miller. His article does not mention his death, leading me to assume that his death is in no way remarkable. Nor is "Jeffrey Miller" his common name, so it's exceedingly unlikely someone would use "Death of Jeffrey Miller" for this person. The Kent State victim, however, is definitely notable for his death so the redirect to his article is appropriate. -- Tavix (talk) 14:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Tavix. This is why we have hatnotes. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Midland Railway 2501 and 2511 Class locomotives[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 14#Midland Railway 2501 and 2511 Class locomotives

Sound Remedy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retired music artist. No other notability can be established at this time. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep or retarget to RemedySounds. Notability doesn't matter for redirects. — Zawl 17:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable artist, and not to be confused with RemedySounds. The single on the album is not individually charted to be notable, and there are a bunch of other non-notable featured artists like King Deco and Joni Fatora, none of which meet WP:MUSICBIO It would be different if he was the main producer of that album and that was his biggest claim to fame. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.