Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Sportsnet 360

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Sportsnet 360#Programming. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Sportsnet 360[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NLIST and WP:NOTTVGUIDE. No objection to a redirect to Sportsnet 360 // Timothy :: talk 03:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By this logic, other related list shoul be nominated. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Sports, Lists, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:37, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sportsnet 360#Programming as an ATD with actual sourcing. Nate • (chatter) 22:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Lists of programs broadcast by television network are not deemed to fail NOTTVGUIDE — that criterion bars using articles to provide schedule information, such as a complete grid that lists the entire current schedule by timeslot and gets updated weekly with specials and repeat airings and other variations from the "standard" schedule, and has never been deemed to preclude simply listing past and present programming. Tons of television channels and networks have one of these on Wikipedia, because the rule has never been that a network having one of these was a problem.
That said, what is a problem here is the lack of any sourcing to verify that the channel actually aired these programs, and the fact that more than half of the list is redlinked or unlinked entries that may not be independently notable under WP:TVSHOW rules at all. So keep if sourcing can be found to support it, and delete (and/or redirect) if it can't. Also, why would Sportsnet 360 need one of these if we don't have one for Sportsnet proper, and even if we did have one for Sportsnet proper this could still just be merged there rather than needing to stand alone — so the real question is why would this need to be treated separately from the rest of Sportsnet? Bearcat (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because of the variety of options mentioned by participants.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Sportsnet 360#Programming. Sportsnet is the main channel and it doesn't have this, but I am not opposed to keeping if reliable sourcing is found on this. Conyo14 (talk) 06:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.