User talk:Theoneandonlylinguist09

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Theoneandonlylinguist09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! — kashmīrī ^TALK 02:51, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Languages of Pakistan have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Languages of Pakistan was changed by Theoneandonlylinguist09 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861386 on 2023-12-18T02:32:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Languages of Pakistan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Languages of Pakistan, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Languages of Fiji. — AP 499D25 (talk) 02:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Andrevan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andre🚐 05:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my article does not relate to your article about Satya, my article is about Satyam. DO NOT change or edit my article again or i will take action against you for disruptive editing Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 06:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My article is completely different from your's Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 06:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theoneandonlylinguist09! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Andre🚐 06:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to stop disruptively editing an article which does not concern your's nor matches yours. If you continue to disruptively edit an article, you can be blocked permeanently from editing. Should you have any concerns please feel free to reach out to me, rather than engaging in disruptive editing. Thankyou Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 06:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you can't hijack a redirect to create a new article without sources. Please stop. If you revert again I'll open an AN3. Andre🚐 06:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not redirected any article Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

show me where ive hijacked a redirect? my article doesn't talked about satya. DO NOT disruptively edit Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

firstly state what your issue is or else if u continuously disrupt an article, i will have to take action and report you to an administrator Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 06:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm That Tired Tarantula. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Eastern Division, Fiji was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! That Tired Tarantula (talk) 14:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i am incorporating fijian and hindi names to all aspects of fijian pages, as they are fiji's official languages Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 14:13, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Sorry, I made an error in reverting after not noticing details, so I undid my reversion. However, please make sure to indicate that you were adding the native name of an island in infoboxes and prose, since I noticed how you did not in an edit in Sigatoka Sand Dunes, which may have caused that edit's reversion. That Tired Tarantula (talk) 16:59, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 2NumForIce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ~~2NumForIce (^speak|_edits) 16:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pipe058. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Mount Tomanivi was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! pipe058 02:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pipe058. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Navua River was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! pipe058 02:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pipe058. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Civil Aviation Authority of Fiji was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! pipe058 02:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pipe058. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Ba District, Fiji was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! pipe058 02:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pipe058. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Ba District, Fiji was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! pipe058 02:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pipe058. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Civil Aviation Authority of Fiji was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! pipe058 02:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pipe058. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Fiji Sugar Corporation was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! pipe058 02:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Theoneandonlylinguist09 reported by User:Andrevan (Result: ). Thank you. Andre🚐 06:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you have a final warning, i will report u for disruptive editing Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 06:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:ANI-notice}} ~~~~ Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 06:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 06:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC) Andrevan[reply]

After the block expires please use Draft:Satyam to incubate the article instead of hijacking the redirect. Andre🚐 07:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrean continues to disruptively edit my article, where is the penalty for him? Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 07:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theoneandonlylinguist09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here i did give a source, and andrean continues to disruptively edit my article Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 07:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Theoneandonlylinguist09! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Andre🚐 02:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Satyam clothing store (December 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Satyam clothing store and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theoneandonlylinguist09! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Satyam clothing store[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Satyam clothing store, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes[edit]

Article infoboxes and lead section have a specific format and templates. Please stop adding non-English script at random – this is not how the proper way of adding local names.

Also, please keep in mind that most articles don't need local names, even if ones exist! — kashmīrī ^TALK 21:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, proper names are capitalised, also in Fijian. — kashmīrī ^TALK 13:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I've decided to undo all your changes as they don't seem helpful to the reader. For instance, we mention native names only when the English term has been a translation of the local name or in other way has originated from the local name, and not whenever they exist. We don't add names in all local languages, as this would be useless for the reader. Finally, template parameters have a defined format (for instance, name provides the English name for article subject) and should not be messed around with.
If you want to edit Wikipedia, I suggest you start with acquainting yourself with its policies and manual of style. A good place to start is here: Help:Introduction. Cheers, — kashmīrī ^TALK 13:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, but you cannot undo changes because you feel like it, these are official names, in official languages, not "local languages" read up Fiji's official languages act, which requires all areas to be named in Fijian and Hindi Theoneandonlylinguist09 (talk) 02:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. India for example has 22 official languages, yet we don't stick them all in every India-related article. We don't routinely add official names in local languages unless they are well attested and helpful, or unless the English term is only their translation/approximation. Primarily, you need to address the problem I mentioned above – your breaking or misusing Wiki syntax and template parameters, especially with regard to infoboxes, by sticking Fijian and Hindi versions of official English names for places and organisations. The vast majority of these names, as I checked, are NOT KNOWN under what you proposed as native names – these "names" are not even present on official websites, and so on. It appears to me that you just simply back-translated English names into other languages used in Fiji. This is not how Wikipedia works, and such unsourced, questionable additions can be removed by any editor.

Moreover, I advised you to use correct capitalisation. Yet you ignored it, much like everything else that I wrote.

I also suggest you read WP:BRD, because your continuing edit warring will only result in your account being blocked from editing. — kashmīrī ^TALK 02:35, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Satyam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have already been blocked for precisely the same violation. One more such promotional edit and you may find your account blocked, as it icreasingly appears that you are not here to build an encyclopaedia. — kashmīrī ^TALK 02:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert rule[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]