User talk:Sulpyensid

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	For stating Brent Renaud. Tame (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Brent Renaud[edit]

On 14 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Brent Renaud, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 00:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laurence de Cambronne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bipolar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Mahé moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Patrick Mahé, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 19:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick Mahé (March 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kirbanzo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication of notability within the article itself, so WP:NBIO isn't met. In addition, several cites are malformed or broken.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patrick Mahé and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Patrick Mahé, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 22:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sulpyensid! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 22:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alain Mamou-Mani

added links pointing to Dieudonné and Albert Cohen

Emmanuelle Ménard

added a link pointing to Dieudonné

Raoul Vaneigem

added a link pointing to Dieudonné

Robert Ménard

added a link pointing to Dieudonné

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

JR (artist)

added a link pointing to AV

Éditions Grasset

added a link pointing to Dieudonné

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights[edit]

Hi, Sulpyensid. I've marked the article you created, Maks Levin, as reviewed. Thank you for writing it. I've been working a lot on List of journalists killed during the Russo-Ukrainian War, and it's nice to see others who care about this topic.

I did have a concern I wanted to share, though. Some portions of the article were copied from this LensCulture profile. See the bits I removed here and here. Now, the content you copied was mostly lists of names, and it's true that when giving a list of names sometimes there really is no way to avoid copying the same content in the same order, but what you did still cut it closer than is needed. I'm not sure if this rises to the level of copyright violation that we need to remove from the page's history, and will ask an administrator to decide. But either way, even if it doesn't meet that level, it was still too similar to be allowed in the article.

Before you continue editing, I'd appreciate it if you could read through

Wikipedia:Copyright violations
and Wikipedia:Non-free content (or at least the portions of that that apply to text)

just to make sure we don't wind up in an awkward situation where you've misunderstood some point of our copyright policies and a bunch of your content has to be removed.

Again, thank you for writing the Levin article. Hopefully he'll be the last addition to the list. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 22:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Maks Levin[edit]

On 5 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Maks Levin, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 03:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Franz-Olivier Giesbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Berry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Martin Axelrad[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid,

Thank you for creating Martin Axelrad.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article has insufficient references. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 03:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean-Michel Folon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Aram moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sophia Aram, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jeni Wolf (talk) 06:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophia Aram (April 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sophia Aram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sophia Aram, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:32, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salhia Brakhlia moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Salhia Brakhlia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 23:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salhia Brakhlia has been accepted[edit]

Salhia Brakhlia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 11:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid

Thank you for creating Allary Éditions.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul-Éric Blanrue[edit]

Hello Sulpyensid,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Paul-Éric Blanrue for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 03:09, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laurent de Gourcuff moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Laurent de Gourcuff, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 16:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Patrick Mahé[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patrick Mahé, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Françoise Verny[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Françoise Verny, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Axelrad[edit]

The article Martin Axelrad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Patrick Mahé[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Patrick Mahé".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sophia Aram[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sophia Aram, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sophia Aram[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sophia Aram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:33, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Paul-Éric Blanrue[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paul-Éric Blanrue, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paul-Éric Blanrue[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul-Éric Blanrue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:AlexLevyOne per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlexLevyOne. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 23:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cyrille Eldin[edit]

Hello, Sulpyensid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cyrille Eldin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]