User talk:Solidarityandfreedom

Solidarityandfreedom, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Solidarityandfreedom! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Patrick Harris (Party Leader)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Patrick Harris (Party Leader), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Solidarityandfreedom,

I have moved your page to Draft space. Please create and develop articles in Draft space or User space like your Sandbox.

If you have questions about article creation, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 17:12, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Texas gop is the far right party and they have expressed many abhorrent views on this topic as well though. Solidarityandfreedom (talk) 23:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to United Right (Poland), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 13:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Savonarola

Schaff referred to Girolamo Savonarola as a forerunner of Luther, and thus has a reliable source. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 16:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Ok so Wikipedia is totally an unreliable source ? Solidarityandfreedom (talk) 23:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to American Solidarity Party. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 10:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at American Solidarity Party, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anupam^Talk 23:32, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Clement of Rome

The sources you used did not mention about this being about Papal Infallibility, instead you made a conclusion based off a quote of his writing which was not mentioned in a source: this is original research. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 11:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Atleast you now added a source. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Jeez attitude Solidarityandfreedom (talk) 21:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Your recent editing history at American Solidarity Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Anupam^Talk 23:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TolWol56 (talk) 19:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

As a result of the report and the evidence filed at WP:ANI, I have indefinitely blocked you from editing American Solidarity Party. You can try to build consensus for your proposed changes at Talk: American Solidarity Party. Please be aware that if you take your current style of disruptive editing to other articles, you may be blocked from the entire encyclopedia. Read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 01:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Sorry Solidarityandfreedom (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

I am going to take a break from editing and just do discussions for a bit to learn more about it the process of reaching agreement consensus with editors and learn more about it

If you have a suggestion for some article I should discuss in the discussion section please let me know. Solidarityandfreedom (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Patrick Harris (Party Leader)

Hello, Solidarityandfreedom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patrick Harris (Party Leader), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting inaccurate or poorly sourced content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Richard Williamson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

For starters, The Daily Beast is a dubious source for especially for facts about living people. [1]

Next, your edits [2] [3] claimed that the "apology" happened in 2017, when the Daily Beast source was published in 2009. [4].

Finally, you quote Williamson as saying "The Holocaust did happen". Those words are not his. They are not in quotes in the article. They are the Daily Beast's (highly inaccurate) summary. Other sources (one actually cited in the article) make clear that he did not [5][6] specifically retract his Holocaust Denial.

This is very worrying editing. Three serious mistakes in a single edit. I see that you have been warned and sanctioned before for problems with your editing. I think you should consider this a final warning that unless things change, you are not a good fit for the creation of this encyclopedia. Slp1 (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Abortion in china

Abortion in china is in fact not available only for health reasons as of now. The current redaction of the page state incorrect informations by saying that abortion is available ONLY for health reasons. Access to abortions for non-medical reasons has been restricted, but not prohibited. Snarcky1996 (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Please come discuss in the Talk section. Snarcky1996 (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Your edit to Abortion in China has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Content was added back in April. — Diannaa (talk) 14:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Diannaa what does this mean? Solidarityandfreedom (talk) 21:32, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

@Solidarityandfreedom you had copied elements from or all of https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/22/china-new-rules-jiangxi-province-prevent-sex-selective-abortions whcih now cannot be seen.

What the warning message means is that Diannaa has seen and dealt with your violating the copyright of The Guardian newspaper. Be wise, pease, and do not exhibit this behaviour again. Ignorance is never an excuse for copyright violation. You cannot violate copyright by accident. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Your recent editing history at Mayra Flores shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
In addition, you've been notified of BLP sanctions, so I suggest you stop. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Solidarityandfreedom reported by User:Praxidicae (Result: ). Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Abortion in China, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop citing a podcast. It is not an acceptable source. Cullen328 already blocked you from editing one article, and you have made what appear to be disruptive edits on this article for a while now--please don't make us block you from editing this article also. Drmies (talk) 15:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nayef Hawatmeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Jackson Hinkle

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jackson Hinkle, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Jackson Hinkle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson Hinkle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Hinkle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 23:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

At the time you created the Jackson Hinkle article, you were below the 500 edits required to participate in the topic area. Please make sure you're familiar with these rules. Thanks - DFlhb (talk) 14:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Andrew tate

do you know that Sulaiman Ahmed was andrew tate's lawyer ? By --Sunuraju (talk) 04:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

---

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

 -- Primefac (talk) 18:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)