User talk:Nkfarabihasannaim

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Nkfarabihasannaim, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Nkfarabihasannaim, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Waqar💬 13:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nkfarabihasannaim[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Nkfarabihasannaim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waqar💬 13:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I or another admin have deleted content from your user space User:Nkfarabihasannaim .

General information about user pages and user talk pages. User pages and User talk pages are intended only to assist collegiality among users. They are not to be used as a soapbox for writings not connected with the editorial process on Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and

not a free webhosting service ,
not a personal website,
not a blog
not a social media site

Nor are user pages intended to host articles, CV's/resumés or lengthy autobiographies. Wikipedia is not a promotional venue or a place to post ads.

More information on user pages is available at THIS PAGE.

For article creation, please use WP:AfC and you can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk . You can also seek help via IRC chat.

As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information.

Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understand. I want to write about myself on Wikipedia, can't I? You will see my point Nkfarabihasannaim (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Naim Hasan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Naim Hasan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nkfarabihasannaim. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created Draft:Naim Hasan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. UtherSRG (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear, I wrote this article without understanding, so if my account is blocked, I will follow Wikipedia's social guidelines. Please unblock my account. I will not post any more spam like this Nkfarabihasannaim (talk) 03:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nkfarabihasannaim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello dear, I wrote this article without understanding, so if my account is blocked, I will follow Wikipedia's social guidelines. Please unblock my account. I will not post any more spam like thisNkfarabihasannaim (talk) 03:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please address the question below. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion[edit]

Please describe what constructive edits you would make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote my bio by mistake, not realizing it was outside Wikipedia's guidelines. I understand now. I will never post like this again. Please fix my account Nkfarabihasannaim (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please Reactive my account Nkfarabihasannaim (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nkfarabihasannaim (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have not addressed the question: What constructive edits would you make if you were unblocked. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nkfarabihasannaim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wrote my bio by mistake, not realizing it was outside Wikipedia's guidelines. I understand now. I will never post like this again. Please fix my account Nkfarabihasannaim (talk) 10:10 am, 9 February 2024, last Friday (2 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly what edits you would make unconnected with yourself or any other WP:conflict of interest -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The question remains, what edits do you wish to make? 331dot (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]