User talk:MeegsC/Archive 5

Your GA nomination of Black-cowled oriole

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black-cowled oriole you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 03:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black-cowled oriole

The article Black-cowled oriole you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Black-cowled oriole for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 15:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Imperial Triple Crown

I'm very pleased to present the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels to MeegsC, for your work on "Did you know?" and the good and featured article processes! — Bilorv (talk) 17:40, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Congrats on the Imperial Triple Crown! You might be interested in a userbox I made, {{User crown|Imperial}}:

This user has been awarded an Imperial Triple Crown.

— Bilorv (talk) 17:40, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Bilorv! I shall display it with great pride. MeegsC (talk) 17:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Trinidad euphonia

On 21 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trinidad euphonia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Trinidad euphonia lacks the muscular gizzard that most birds have as part of their digestive tract? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trinidad euphonia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Trinidad euphonia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 00:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of endemic birds of Borneo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Mountain blackeye

On 22 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mountain blackeye, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although its range is restricted to the island of Borneo, the mountain blackeye has evolved into four subspecies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mountain blackeye. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mountain blackeye), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Preening

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Preening you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaptainEek -- CaptainEek (talk) 03:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of endemic birds of Borneo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Preening

The article Preening you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Preening for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaptainEek -- CaptainEek (talk) 00:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Black-sided flowerpecker

On 25 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black-sided flowerpecker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that black-sided flowerpeckers camouflage the outside of their nests with lichens? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black-sided flowerpecker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Black-sided flowerpecker), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
• Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
• Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
• Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
• The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
• Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
• Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
• Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
• Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Extirpation vs local extinction

MeegsC:

I pinged you on a discussion you may be interested in. See Talk: Local extinction..Pvmoutside (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Trinidad euphonia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trinidad euphonia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Black-chinned sparrow

On 19 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black-chinned sparrow, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the song of the black-chinned sparrow (pictured) is said to resemble the sound of a dropped ping-pong ball? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black-chinned sparrow. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Black-chinned sparrow), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Mothercraft Training Society

Hi MeegsC

I agree the source is confusing, but in 1930 when the annex was opened the current Queen's title was Princess Elizabeth of York - see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_titles_and_honours_of_Elizabeth_II

The title of the Queen Mother at the time she opened the annex was the Duchess of York. What would be more appropriate for a maternity care centre than to name its new building after a four year old princess? People were very fussy about titles and names then and if the intention was to call it after the Duchess of York they would have done so. They were so deferential then, that I suspect the board of the centre would have asked the Palace if the Duchess would like the new annex to be named in honour of the Duchess (who was a patron of the Mothercraft Training Society) and she suggested that it should be named after her child, Princess Elizabeth.

Simon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon Edwards Esq (talk • contribs) 11:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Mothercraft Training Society

It would make no sense at all, and in fact it would have been a slight to the Duchess, to have called it the Princess Elizabeth Hostel, if the intention was to have named it after the Duchess. After all she opened it, and if it was to have been called after her why wouldn't it have been called after her title at the time of opening - The Duchess of York Hostel? Why would she want it called after an old title of hers? Remember that at that time she had no idea that her four year old daughter, Princess Elizabeth of York, would become queen - indeed it was very unlikely. I don't have a source to confirm, I'm afraid, so don't worry about DYK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon Edwards Esq (talk • contribs) 11:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Pings

Hi there, what triggers a notification is using any of the notification templates AND a signature with the same edit. If you forget to sign, it does not work. I’m sure Gertrude has the nomination page on her watchlist and she’ll thus see it anyway. Schwede66 19:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Schwede66 – yep. Unfortunately, I forgot to sign. D'oh! I was hoping one (or both) of you would be watching. MeegsC (talk) 19:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

So what you do in future is two further edits. Step one: remove notification templates and save. Step 2: paste templates back in, sign and save. That fixes it. If you’ve signed but had forgotten the template (or messed it up), it’s easier. Add / fix template, change the time in the signature time stamp, and save. Schwede66 19:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Mothercraft Training Society

MeegsC thanks for working at this one. Moonraker is brilliant and has come to my rescue again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon Edwards Esq (talk • contribs) 20:51, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of Preening

Congratulations, MeegsC! The article you nominated, Preening, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Trinidad euphonia

The article Trinidad euphonia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trinidad euphonia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 20:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Prep sets

Thank you for your work on building prep sets. Prep 2, which I have just moved into the queue, seems a nicely balanced set. Before you finish with a set, you should remove any unused {{DYKnom|Example|Nominator}} at the foot, which is only there to provide an example of the credit format for nominations I suppose. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth - sure! Sorry to have forgotten. I've enjoyed learning the process; time-consuming but interesting. Glad to do my bit! MeegsC (talk) 07:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

hi again

Just curious about 2nd image on infobox, but Purple-throated cotinga and Ring Ouzel has it.

If you look, there is no other picture of a female purple-throated cotinga on that article's page. Same thing on the ring ouzel page. However, there is a picture of a female/nonbreeding male elsewhere on the black-chinned sparrow page – with additional information in the caption. MeegsC (talk) 09:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Okay, so only male bird can get multiple images. I'm trying to get a quality image on Flickr on every GA or becoming GA bird article soon, but thanks for the info. 180.194.141.59 (talk) 09:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

No, you mistake me. For one thing, females and nonbreeding males look the same, so trying to make it a male/female thing is ridiculous. Right now, on the black-chinned sparrow page, we have one clear male, one female/nonbreeding male/youngster, and one back view. No repeated images. Perhaps on other pages, there are repeated images. In my view, there shouldn't be. Each picture should illustrate something different. Yes, I could move the nonbreeding bird picture into the infobox, but that would mean losing the caption, which has some good information in it. I see no reason to do that. And as for "quality images", are you saying you think there's an issue with the pictures already in the article? With which one? MeegsC (talk) 09:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

There's no Issue, I mean I tend to find good quality image on flickr on Every GA article without a real-life photo of a bird with only illustation image on infobox like Blyth's kingfishe‎r (which I changed). 180.194.141.59 (talk) 10:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Ah! I understand. That's great! The project can always use more good pictures of birds. Like I said before, if you're adding multiple images, try to get birds of different ages, or in different plumages, or within their habitat, or engaged in interesting behaviours. In general, I think it's better to put multiple images in the text of the article rather than putting multiples in the infobox. For one thing, the infobox constrains them (because of the parameters set there) where putting them in the article doesn't. And it's good to fill in the "alt text" parameter for anything you add too, so that our unsighted visitors can understand what's being shown. MeegsC (talk) 10:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok, noted. I don't do alt text, cause I don't have knowledge of describing anything (I just did it on Chestnut-capped piha on attempting to help the guy on GA). If I saw you aiming the bird article into GA, I'll do my best to request a good image on flickr, thank you. 180.194.141.59 (talk) 10:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Hunterdon Art Museum, Dunham's Mill

MeegsC, will you be returning to this nomination to respond, or should I find a new reviewer to consider the issues you raised that the nominator has pinged you about. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder BlueMoonset. I've been meaning to ask the community for thoughts. MeegsC (talk) 09:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

MeegsC: Looks great! Thanks, Zeete (talk) 19:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for moving one of the politician hooks. I was going to move it myself after I noticed my mistake, but I admit that I got distracted with other things. SL93 (talk) 21:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

No worries, SL93. You've been a real workhorse at DYK – I think you build more preps than the rest of us put together! MeegsC (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

I try my best. I review a set of nominations before promoting them one by one - I have been wondering if doing it that way is an issue because I remember Yoninah wondering why I don't save the prep as one edit. Knowing me, I would likely mess up the formatting that way. Anyway, I think you do a great job building preps. SL93 (talk) 21:14, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks SL93! That's high praise, coming from a long-timer like you. :) I'm enjoying it; it gives me an excuse to read lots of articles I probably wouldn't have seen otherwise. It takes an absolute age though! MeegsC (talk) 07:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

I'm glad that there are other prep builders. I was building them mostly by myself after Yoninah died and then I just decided to give up unless more help arrived. I'm so glad that it did. SL93 (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Whitehead's trogon

On 20 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Whitehead's trogon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that stones have been found in the stomachs of some Whitehead's trogons (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Whitehead's trogon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Whitehead's trogon), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

March 2021 GAN Backlog drive

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for completing 4 reviews in the March 2021 backlog drive. Your work helped us reduce the backlog by over 52%. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Imperial Napoleonic Triple Crown

I'm very pleased to present the Imperial Napoleonic Triple Crown Jewels to MeegsC, for your work on "Did you know?" and the good and featured article processes! — Bilorv (talk) 20:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Congrats on the Triple Crown(s)! You might be interested in a userbox I made, {{User crown|Napoleonic}}:

This user has been awarded an Imperial Napoleonic Triple Crown.

— Bilorv (talk) 20:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Bilorv! MeegsC (talk) 10:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Building sets

The sets that you build are great, but set builders really should be working from the oldest to the newest to build balanced preps. There are still multiple nominators who have been waiting since last month. SL93 (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

SL93, I do start each set looking at the oldest hooks. But I think that building interesting, varied sets is more important than just starting with the oldest. As one whose recent DYK hook waited well over a month to run, I understand the frustration with waiting, believe me! ;) MeegsC (talk) 11:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

I guess we just have different ways of going for interesting sets. I was mostly confused because there are currently around 126 hooks to choose from in the approved list and a hook from April 23 was promoted. SL93 (talk) 11:37, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't just start from the oldest. I start from the oldest to build a varied set and I don't think too hard into what I find most interesting because obviously someone has found all of the approved hooks interesting. An example is prep 2 which I recently finished - none of the topics are the same as each other although it could be argued that The Dream of Ossian and Ethel Becher are slightly related because of the war angle, but I believe that the first hook is more related to art and the latter hook is more related to nursing. SL93 (talk) 12:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

I'm just letting you know that I didn't mean anything bad by this. I did bring it up on the DYK talk page to innocently see what others thought, but someone thought that I was targeting them despite me not naming anyone or even paying much attention to who filled the prep area. It was very upsetting to me. SL93 (talk) 15:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

That's okay SL93. We have different ways of doing things, which is fine. The world would be a very boring place if everybody was the same! MeegsC (talk) 17:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

I did think that not naming anyone and not paying attention to who promoted those hooks would be a good way to get people's two cents. Now I'm even questioning myself when it comes to even bringing up actual technical errors in hooks. I respect Yoninah and Cwm-however the username is spelled and I just learned off of them. I don't think getting opinions should mean that I'm targeting someone. SL93 (talk) 17:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Well, it seems to me that prep building is going nicely at the moment, with several sets regularly being filled and ready for moving into the queue. I promote a few hooks occasionally, but normally restrict myself to no more than two per set, so as not to disqualify myself from moving the set into the queue if necessary. When I do promote hooks, I mainly choose older ones, or ones that SL93 has created or approved, otherwise such hooks may get stuck. DYK seems to be running smoothly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

AcademiaNet

Hi, thank you for your comment on AcademiaNet. I try to follow your directions and also talked to my colleagues about it. We found some more independent sources and also try to rewrite the article partially. Would still be happy, if you have a look on it, ones I'm done with the editing. Et Cité (talk) I now editet Draft:AcademiaNet by adding three addtional sources and changing several things. Can you check on it, if it is more suitable for publication and give me further advices, if it still seems unready? Thanks, Et Cité (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Et Cité I approved the article. Now all that it is needed is for categories to be added. SL93 (talk) 21:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

• The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
• Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
• Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
• Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
• Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
• Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
• Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Editing DYK

Just wanted to let you know that changing holds to houses is perfectly good by me and definitely a needed clarification. I'd also like to add you might want to link to the Dijon Cathedral on the line about the abbey, as that's where it's located. Deku link (talk) 20:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black-chinned sparrow

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black-chinned sparrow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black-chinned sparrow

The article Black-chinned sparrow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Black-chinned sparrow for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:40, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black-chinned sparrow

The article Black-chinned sparrow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Black-chinned sparrow for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

This was in my watchlist since it appeared on DYK. Congrats MeegsC on GA! It is an enjoyable reading.--Chanaka L (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Chanakal! Glad you like it; it was fun to work on. MeegsC (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

The Duke

Thank you for promoting Britten's Jubilate. Only now do I see that it mentions the Duke's birthdays which would make much sense on 10 June, which would have been his centenary. What do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm happy to move it to the special events area if you prefer. I tweaked the hook wording a bit to make it a bit more "English" (e.g. "at the request" instead of "on the request"). I was just going to drop you a note and ask you if the changes looked okay. Let me know! MeegsC (talk) 11:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the offer, and the tweak in the hook, and the copy-editing of the article, and yes, if not too much work, put it to special occasions. I like hooks on a person's birthday, and now 100 ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Sounds good! I'll do that now. MeegsC (talk) 11:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Casque (anatomy)

On 8 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Casque (anatomy), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the casques of some large hornbill species (example pictured) can take up to six years to reach their full size? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Casque (anatomy). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Casque (anatomy)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Preening scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for May 8, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or for Featured Articles promoted recently from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page. Feel free to comment on this.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article about "a behaviour that all birds use to keep their feathers in good shape. It's a behaviour that most of us have probably witnessed at some point, as birds spend quite a bit of time each day preening — up to 15% of their day, in some species. I've enjoyed researching this one; though I've been birding nearly my whole life, even I didn't know some of this before I worked on the article!"! --

Thanks Gerda Arendt! It was a fun one to work on. MeegsC (talk) 08:57, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

dyk

Hey, MeegsC! I wonder if you'd be willing to move the Meredith Clark hook back to approved noms? It's an American hook and because of two-a-days that set is due to run in the US night, and I'm hoping whoever promotes it will think it's a good image; I know you'd already put an image into that set. Also it was only nominated a week ago, so there are dozens of hooks ahead of it in line. People already think regulars at dyk get some sort of special treatment. :D —valereee (talk) 13:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Sure, I can do that, valereee. I was trying to find some US hooks to balance all the European ones! MeegsC (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

That's an interesting point...we generally do have more US hooks than anything else, so how to balance that during two-a-days? Hm. —valereee (talk) 15:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

For work at WP:DYK

	The DYK Medal
	For suggesting great hooks on a third-party nom, and other work put into the DYK process over the past few months. CMD (talk) 03:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks CMD! MeegsC (talk) 08:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Martin Rundkvist

Hi there, thanks again for your review of this article. I've been thinking about nominating this at FAC, and wondered if you had any thoughts or suggestions? I'm pretty confident the article is at, or close to, the best possible version of itself—my general barometer for when an article should be a featured article—but would appreciate your input, as someone who has already looked at the article in depth. Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mountain blackeye

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mountain blackeye you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaptainEek -- CaptainEek (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Museums prep

This was really impressive! Great work! —valereee (talk) 01:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks valereee! We had a lot of help. :) MeegsC (talk) 06:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, MeegsC. I'm just posting to let you know that List of endemic birds of Borneo – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 11. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mountain blackeye

The article Mountain blackeye you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mountain blackeye for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaptainEek -- CaptainEek (talk) 18:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black-legged seriema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rhea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Cyrtophora_citricola

Hi. I was looking over some old GANs and noticed that Talk:Cyrtophora citricola/GA1 has been waiting for input from you for a while. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:00, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda Arendt! It's nice to be noticed. Particularly by an editor as prolific as you! :) MeegsC (talk) 09:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Cicinnurus

You should probably be aware of this reversion of a redirect you made on Cicinnurus - it's not my subject! Le Deluge (talk) 12:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Keihäsmatkat

Hello MeegsC,

As you requested at Template:Did you know nominations/Keihäsmatkat, I have now found references for the unreferenced paragraphs at Keihäsmatkat. Is the article OK now? JIP | Talk 09:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Cyrtophora citricola/GA1

MeegsC, just a reminder that it's been over a month since you last posted to this review, and you indicated that there was more to come. Do you think you'll be able to return to your review here soon? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder BlueMoonset. I'll try to wrap that up tomorrow. MeegsC (talk) 21:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Red-billed pied tanager

MeegsC, please return to this nomination as soon as possible to let us know whether your concerns have been addressed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

BlueMoonset, I thought I had made clear on the nomination that the changes Craigthebirder had made were fine and fixed my concern. I've repeated that again. Hopefully that's enough? MeegsC (talk) 20:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

MeegsC, you have the most recently placed icon, the slash. If your issues have been addressed and the nomination has met the DYK criteria, then it's up to you to supersede your slash icon by placing a tick with a subsequent comment; the article can't be moved to the Approved page by the bot while the latest icon says there are issues. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Ah. Okay. Thanks BlueMoonset. I'll be sure to do that in the future. MeegsC (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Black-legged seriema

On 22 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black-legged seriema, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Toba people use poultices made from the manure of the black-legged seriema to treat boils and abscesses? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black-legged seriema. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Black-legged seriema), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

• The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
• Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
• Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
• Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
• Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
• BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Hooded visorbearer

On 23 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hooded visorbearer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the hooded visorbearer (example pictured) builds its nest out of cactus spines? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hooded visorbearer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hooded visorbearer), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for several more good ones! - Sigh, I hoped for the Hebbel-Theater to be pictured, both by uniqueness of the structure and substance of the article, on top of relevance. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

I'm facing problem in wikiproject bird

Hi I'm ashy prinai. I was helping in cleanup at wikiproject bird today, when I finished my editing in love bird's . I noticed a user named"User talk:FudgeMobile" was removing my Edit's without any reason. So, help me

Thanking you 😊 Ashy prinai (talk) 13:34, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Cyrtophora citricola/GA1 redux

MeegsC, it's been over a month since you last posted to this review, and over four months since you opened it. Please try to prioritize this so it can be concluded in a timely fashion. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:39, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

It's been over another month, and you haven't been around much, and not at all in the last three weeks. If you haven't returned by the nomination by the end of August, the nomination will have to be considered abandoned; it's been open for over five months. Should that happen, I'll try to find a new reviewer for it. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, Lee Vilenski, BennyOnTheLoose, Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Whenever yer ready......

I reckon Physcia caesia is within striking distance of FA-hood. Ping me if/when you decide to nominate and I can hang around looking useful help out Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:09, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

1. The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
2. Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
3. Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
4. Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
5. Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
6. BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
7. Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
8. Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
• Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
• Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas
	I see you not being active anymore, Ill make sure you are fine. Wishing you good health. Merry Christmas! 2001:4455:1A9:E100:CD3:F362:DAAB:6D88 (talk) 23:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Invitation

Invinciblewalnut (talk) 05:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Haematomma ochroleucum

Regarding your comment on WT:DYK this article was lifted from my sandbox with nary a mention of my work in the revision history of the article. This is the second time that this user has done this with my work and it's really not on!, I note this was done by an IP user and it was their only edit. What was the other occasion? Schwede66 22:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

I'm assuming it's the same anonymous user who lifted my rufous-brown solitaire article (sandbox copy) a few years ago. Also without attribution, also without asking first. MeegsC (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

The first one was in April 2021 by a user in the Philippines. That user gave attribution in their edit summary (but obviously it’s not ok to ask first). The second one was a user in Japan. What I don’t understand about the first case is why you would start an article in draft space for something that’s been in maintenance forever? Or am I missing something? Schwede66 09:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Schwede66, I often write large expansions for existing articles in my own sandbox, and then transfer those sections into the live article at some later point — particularly if I'm trying to get to 5x expansion, in order to submit it to DYK. (As you can see from my sandboxes, it often takes me a very long time to get a 5x expansion. I have too many RL commitments to be able to work on WP every day. Or even every week!) As for whether I think it's the same person, someone from the Philippines and I had multiple conversations (over several months and multiple IP addresses) where he made it clear he was watching all of my sandboxes and article upgrades. He also admitted he was the one who'd moved the first article. He became a helpful asset, helping to find photos from CC-compliant sites to support articles I was working on. I'm pretty sure it's the same person who wished me a happy Christmas (using still another Philippine-based IP) at the end of last year. The fact that he comments there that it appears I'm no longer active and then days later one of my sandboxes is cloned? Possibly coincidence, possibly not. I'm not inclined to think a second person is randomly watching my sandboxes, if we're honest. But maybe I'm wrong. Maybe my writing efforts are more popular than I think! ;-) MeegsC (talk) 13:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Schwede66 For what it's worth, I think it might help to add here that is not unusual for editors to do that (what else is the sandbox for?) but also there are other reasons why there are unpublished articles in many userspaces on WP, which appear to be almost or even completely ready for publication. I currently have one like that, which looks complete, but is actually not neutral, relying as it does on old sources which were not written from a 21st-century pc perspective. I have bought a book which will make a great source for balancing the article, but I have not yet read it fully, or worked out how to apply it as a source. Some of us don't do short, drive-by article creations; some of us want to do it properly first time out. Another very good reason for not publishing an apparently finished article is that it contains major errors and/or doubtful sources, or due to a recent event it has become out of date. Sometimes there are some perfect sources out there, but the editor is waiting to be able to afford to subscribe, i.e. get back beyond the source paywall again, so as to double-check the source. This may happen to students who have institutional access to sources, then after leaving their academic institution they have to wait until they can get access to sources again. Some editors retire from paid work, and find that they must cancel all or some of their many subscriptions to academic sources. WP library is very useful, but it is limited, and is no substitute for certain sources on niche subjects. Those of us who create articles are very lucky that (although there will always be creeps who want to overlook our userfied work-up articles) WP at least officially does let us alone to get on with it, without hassling us as to how, why and when. Some years ago, I was working up an article which became huge and was split into several articles. I became anxious because an old-fashioned attitude that I grew up with was fighting with the very laudable modern attitude, which was fighting with the academic necessity of proving by third-party citation only. It took me some years to dare to publish it. Since then that work has spawned two building listings by National Heritage, and two blue plaques, plus some newspaper articles. I am shortly to lecture on the subject of those articles, by invitation of a city's civic society. So sometimes it is worthwhile waiting to get it right. My apologies for such a long comment, but I think it had to be said. Storye book (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for the thorough explanation. Schwede66 16:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

My edit (now deleted) on the above article talk page

MeegsC, please accept my apologies for an editing error that you saw in my comment (due to my failing eyesight), which was actually intended to support your complaint. I was attempting to correct it to say that you started it in 2017 and the thief pretended to start it in 2021, when that page was deleted. The initial error was due to me attempting to add more information into my comment, and I added it into the wrong place, which swapped over the identities and dates. Really sorry. Storye book (talk) 11:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Storye book, I figured that was what you'd intended, but wanted to make it crystal clear to anyone else who didn't bother to check the sandbox logs themselves. Thanks for your support there! I'll try to finish the article up and get it into mainspace soon, but RL is pretty crazy at the moment. MeegsC (talk) 13:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Good luck and all the best. Storye book (talk) 14:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Coming back to your original question what can be done about it, MeegsC. Nothing at the IP user end if there are random IPs involved. So the only approach is to delete work from mainspace taken without attribution. 66 16:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Schwede66 Are you sure that that is the only option? MeegsC has said that it could be kept in mainspace if it could be attributed to them, as the true original creator. Now, I have heard that an administrator can merge mainspace article histories with userspace workup histories in cases where the article has been copied and pasted into mainspace instead of being moved. I have not followed that up, but if it were possible, that would give original credit to MeegsC. I don't know whether MeegsC would want it done that way, but should they want that - is it not worth finding out whether it is feasible, and then giving MeegsC the last word on the decision? Storye book (talk) 17:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Indeed, a history merge can also be done. That’s easy enough; I could do that if it’s desired. Schwede66 18:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Excellent! I look forward to hearing what MeegsC has to say, then. Storye book (talk) 18:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

1. Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
2. AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
3. Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
6. Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
7. Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
• AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
• Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
• GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
• Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
• SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
• Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
• AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
• Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
• GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
• Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
• SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
• Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hydrobatidae list header

Template:Hydrobatidae list header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 11:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pelecanidae list header

Template:Pelecanidae list header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 11:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Phaethontidae list header

Template:Phaethontidae list header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 11:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Podicipedidae list header

Template:Podicipedidae list header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 11:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Precious

Eight years!

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Awww... Thanks Gerda Arendt. The recognition is much appreciated! :) MeegsC (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis

Upcoming Indianapolis event - June 21: Wiki Loves Pride Indy
	You are invited to join us at IUPUI University Library for a Wiki Loves Pride editathon—hosted by IUPUI University Library, and supported by the Central Indiana Community Foundation—where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on this theme: Tuesday, June 21: Wikipedia:Meetup/Indianapolis/Wiki Loves Pride 2022 (RSVP), focusing on Indiana LGBT history and culture. 11am–4pm at IUPUI University Library, Ashby Browsing Room. We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic & Jere

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 19:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC).)

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter

The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
• Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
• Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

July 28: You're invited! Food Deserts & Food Policy in Indianapolis editathon

	Upcoming Indianapolis event - July 28: Food Deserts & Food Policy
	You are invited to join us at Ruth Lilly Law Library for an edit-a-thon on Food Deserts & Food Policy hosted by Ruth Lilly Law Library and United States National Agricultural Library. Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on food deserts, nutrition, and related local and federal food policy. Thursday, July 28th from 11am-4pm, in Room 235G, Inlow Hall, 530 West New York St. Indianapolis, IN 46202. Visit the Wikipedia/Meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more. We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic, Jere, & Jamie

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 08:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC).)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lichen task force members

A tag has been placed on Category:Lichen task force members indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Outline of lichens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

List building tool: SearchSuite

You might find SearchSuite helpful for finding relevant topics to add to your lists in the Outline of lichens. It provides toggles in the side menu to enhance search results, including the ability to strip entries down to one line each, alphabetize the entries, present the entries in wiki list format (for ease of copying/pasting directly into articles such as outlines), and more.

It is even more powerful when used with the following "tip-of-the-day": Tip of the day/March 18 - Breaking the 500 limit applied to search results. This can be used with WP search results to list up to 5,000 (10,000 for admins).

Please let me know if you find these useful, and feel free to ask questions.    — The Transhumanist   14:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Red warbler

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 25 September 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 21:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Outline of lichens

Please do not feel intimidated by my edits, which are made in the spirit of assistance. Feel free to undo or change anything as you see fit. After all, you have expertise in the subject, while I have none. I defer to your judgement. Your work on the outline shows that you truly enjoy the topic, and helping others to learn about it. I can hardly wait to see what you come up with next. Have fun,    — The Transhumanist   15:14, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Nice outline. Have you considered using {{annotated link}} for the taxonomic groups? Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 15:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Peter! I'm afraid most of the annotations would be fairly uninformative. For instance, all 8 classes would say "class of fungi" (which is already pretty apparent from the section header) and the 38 orders would all say "order of fungi". I can try to make the short descriptions more specific (i.e. "order of fungi in class foo"), but I find they typically get changed back to the very simplest of descriptions. MeegsC (talk) 15:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately some of our editors do not consider the alternative uses for short descriptions and are fixated on an arbitrary and unofficial length limit. I agree if this is common, they would not be very useful. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 16:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Userbox

Hello. FYI, I've had a userbox created for me, and I thought it might be of interest since you were involved with the WikiProject Novels/Crime task force. It says "This user reads Hard-boiled detective fiction" and the code to implement it is:

This user reads Hard-boiled detective fiction.

. (Add double braces to the red text: {{ }}). Pete Best Beatles (talk) 22:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, Pete. I'll have a look. MeegsC (talk) 06:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the code seems to have a typo, causing it to appear incorrectly. Here is the fixed code that you can copy and paste.

Wikitext	userbox	where used
{{User:KomradeKalashnikov/Userboxes/HB Detective Fiction}}	This user reads Hard-boiled detective fiction.	linked pages

-- KomradeKalashnikov (talk) 01:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Board of Trustees election

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

TFA

September songs

Thank you today for Red warbler, introduced (in 2018): "This article is about a cute little bird from Central America - so far birds from outside anglophone areas are a tad underrepresented, so here goes."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, Gerda Arendt! Glad you enjoyed it. It's certainly a gorgeous little bird! MeegsC (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Usnea

Hi Meegs, I saw you working on Usnea ... I have several secondary sources that would be quite good for expanding this article; if you're interested, let me know and I'll figure out a way to send them to you. Esculenta (talk) 20:44, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

• @Esculenta:, sure – that would be great! I do have access to a lot through the WP:Library (and some of my own memberships), but I'm always game for more sources! MeegsC (talk) 20:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

I absolutely don't mind help on this one either. I basically picked it because it's one of our more widely-read articles, and could use a lot of work! MeegsC (talk) 20:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Ok, I'll sort out my literature here, and take cellphone images of the good stuff. Not clear on the best way to get it to you; are you familiar with Sharedrop P2P file transfer website? Apparently I can drag and drop files onto it, send you the address, then you can take the files from there. Esculenta (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Or you could just email them to me using the Wikipedia email feature. MeegsC (talk) 21:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Sure, that works too (function wasn't showing up for me before because one needs to have an email setup in preferences); I'll email by tomorrow. Esculenta (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Hmmm, email only seems to work with plain text (can't attach files), unless there's something I don't know about? Esculenta (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Looks like you're right. Check your emails though, Esculenta; I've sent you a message. MeegsC (talk) 21:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Ok, I've sent info from 4 sources ... let me know if you received ok. Esculenta (talk) 16:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Got 'em! Thanks Esculenta. MeegsC (talk) 17:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Felipes

On 8 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Felipes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lichen genus Felipes is named for its fruiting structures, which resemble a cat's paw? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Felipes. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Felipes), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Haematomma ochroleucum

On 14 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Haematomma ochroleucum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the yellow bloodstain lichen is not always yellow? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Haematomma ochroleucum 2. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Haematomma ochroleucum), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glossary of lichen terms has been accepted

Glossary of lichen terms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Piccolia

On 19 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Piccolia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while some lichen species in the genus Piccolia have ranges which span multiple continents, others are restricted to single islands? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Piccolia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Piccolia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Flavocetraria

Hi MeegsC, the Flavocetraria -> Nephromopsis synonymy is one of many that was rejected by Lücking (2019) doi:10.1080/07352689.2019.1650517. The other instances in the Parmeliaceae are Cetrariopsis, Flavocetrariella, Kaernefeltia, Masonhalea, Nesolechia, Raesaenenia, Tuckermanella, Tuckermanopsis, Usnocetraria, and Vulpicida. Esculenta (talk) 21:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for letting me know Esculenta I'm going by the info on Index Fungorum, so that's probably something you want to tell Paul to fix. (I started looking there when I couldn't find anything on the Catalogue of Life.) MeegsC (talk) 21:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter

The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is

• Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
• Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
• BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
• Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
• Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
• Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
• PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
• Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.

• Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
• Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
• Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
• Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
• Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
• SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
• Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
• Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
• Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
• Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

List of birds of Tuvalu FLC

Hey, MeegsC, maybe you forgot about this, but I replied to the comments you made on the List of birds of Tuvalu FLC over three weeks ago, and have pinged you multiple times since. Could you please go over my replies and tell me if their satisfactory soon? AryKun (talk) 09:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Newsletter question

Hi Meegs, happy new year! Thanks for the shoutout on the lichen newsletter. I was wondering if I could pick your brain on the making and sending of newsletters - my main work is with the Unreferenced Articles project (redheaded stepchild of WP, or so it seems) and I'm trying to drum up activity with current and potential volunteers. I really like the layout of the lichen newsletter and was wondering if you have a template for making it, adding pertinent news, the archive, sending it automatically to talk pages, etc. This project is near and dear to my heart and I'm trying to revitalize it as best I can. Thanks for any help. Kazamzam (talk) 15:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Kazamzam. Happy New Year to you too! I don't have a template; I just clear out the previous month's info, change the header color and picture to one of several options and type in any new material. It's pretty easy to do! I'm happy to help tweak anything you're not sure how to do. I still want to make a few additions (like adding previous issue/next issue buttons). With such a small task force, I just hand "deliver" the newsletter. But when I used to do one for the WP:BIRDS project (which is much bigger), I used one of the many newsletter delivering bots which have been programmed. They're easy to find. MeegsC (talk) 22:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Amazonotrema

On 10 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amazonotrema, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while most lichens that grow on plants live on the surface, the sole species in Amazonotrema grows partially among the cells of the tree bark on which it lives? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amazonotrema. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Amazonotrema), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

October lichen task force newsletter

<--- Previous issue | Next issue ---> | Tip Line SYMBIOSIS: The lichen task force newsletter — October 2022 A look at what we've accomplished, working together
As a subset of WP:FUNGI, the lichen task force is working to improve coverage of the world's lichens – unique organisms composed of one or more fungal partners with one or more photosynthetic partners. A growing body of evidence suggests that some of the roughly 1000 secondary metabolites produced by various lichens may prove instrumental in our ongoing battle against harmful pathogens. Want to learn more? Join us!	Articles of note Esculenta has nominated two articles for GA: Solorina crocea Verrucariaceae – a family of mostly lichenized fungi found primarily on rocks and soil in the Northern Hemisphere Solorina crocea – also known as "orange chocolate chip lichen", this was one of the first lichen species to be formally scientifically described
Project news It's been another busy month for the task force. Among the accomplishments: We've tagged another 700 articles, categories and templates as being under the purview of the task force. Importance levels have now been set for nearly all of the task force's articles. Thousands of articles have been tagged with lichen class/order/genus/species categories as appropriate. Work has continued on converting those articles which still using old "taxobox" templates to the newer automatic taxobox and speciesbox templates. There are now fewer than 95 left to modify. MerielGJones has created articles for a number of important lichenologists, including James D. Lawrey, Thomas George Allan Green, Pier Luigi Nimis, Hannes Hertel, Ludger Kappen, and Christian Leuckert. Esculenta added one for Georges Clauzade. Dozens of articles have been created for genera and species of lichen and lichenicolous fungi. The outline of lichens is now almost completely referenced. Work has continued on the Draft:Glossary of lichen terms, which will hopefully be ready to move into main space within the month.
Lichen news A recent study strongly suggests that industrial forestry, along with the introduction of nitrogen, is the main cause of lichen declines in Norway spruce forests. This decline has resulted in "cascading effects on biodiversity and function of boreal forest canopies", according to the study's authors.
Got a suggestion? A correction? Something you'd like to see included in a future issue? Drop a note at the Tip Line with your ideas!

MeegsC (talk) 22:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)]]

Triple Crown

Congratulation to MeegsC, for being the first recipient of the WikiProject Birds Triple Crown. Keep up the great work! Damien Linnane (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lichen growth forms

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lichen growth forms you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:41, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lichen growth forms

The article Lichen growth forms you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lichen growth forms and Talk:Lichen growth forms/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lichen growth forms

The article Lichen growth forms you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lichen growth forms for comments about the article, and Talk:Lichen growth forms/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

February lichen task force newsletter

<--- Previous issue | Next issue ---> | Tip Line SYMBIOSIS: The lichen task force newsletter — February 2023 A look at what we've accomplished, working together
Did you know that lichens can grow on glass, plastic and metals, as well as their more typical wood, stone, leaf and dirt substrates? Did you know that scientists have done experiments on the International Space Station where lichens have been exposed to space for weeks at a time — enduring the vacuum, solar radiation, and frigid temperatures outside of the station — and that these lichens have then photosynthesized normally when returned to earth? Did you know that lichens cover more than 7 percent of the earth's surface, and that some live permanently submerged underwater? Join us to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of these amazing organisms. There's plenty to write about!	Articles of note New GA article: Lichen growth forms DYK appearances: Amazonotrema (January 10) Various lichen growth forms
Project news With the (hopefully temporary) loss of our most prolific editor, things were decidedly slower in January, with fewer recent changes to report. MerielGJones has added to her admirable list of articles on important lichenologists with one about Oliver Gilbert and another about Arthur Edward Wade. MeegsC took lichen growth forms to GA status. Verrucariaceae, which Esculenta expanded, is currently being reviewed for potential GA status as well. Jengod created a nice composite photo for the project to use. (See it at right) Various WikiGnomes have continued to fix spelling and grammar issues in the recently-expanded glossary of lichen terms.
Got a suggestion? A correction? Something you'd like to see included in a future issue? Drop a note at the Tip Line with your ideas!

MeegsC (talk) 20:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 March newsletter

So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
• Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
• FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
• TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
• Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, Trainsandotherthings, Lee Vilenski, Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, SounderBruce, Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your work on lichen pages!

Benre45 (talk) 03:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, Benre45! If you're interested, please feel free to join us at the lichen task force. There's plenty to do! ;) MeegsC (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023 lichen task force newsletter

<--- Previous issue | Next issue ---> | Tip Line SYMBIOSIS: The Lichen task force newsletter — May 2023 A look at what we've accomplished, working together
It's been a few months since the last newsletter, primarily because there hasn't been much to report! We continue to make slow progress on turning red links to blue in the outline of lichens, mostly through the addition of articles about lichen taxa. The glossary of lichen terms has also continued to grow, with dozens of definitions added over the past few months. However, given that there are more than 1000 lichen genera (we have articles on just under 900 of them), and more than 20,000 lichen species (90% of which have no article yet), there's plenty more to write about. All hands on deck!	Articles of note New GA article: Verrucariaceae Caloplaca flavescens – one of the many lichen species with no article as of 1 May
Project news With the upgrade of Verrucariaceae back in late February, we have another GA for the project, but there have been no GA or DYK additions since then. MerielGJones continues to expand our coverage of lichenologists, with articles about Léon Vouaux and Kenneth Andrew Kershaw added since the last newsletter. The number of articles on our cleanup listing has grown, with 4% of the task force's articles showing some sort of issue. These range from missing or unreliable sources to dead external links and orphaned articles. Some of these could probably be sorted relatively quickly, if you're looking for a fast way to help the project improve its coverage.
Got a suggestion? A correction? Something you'd like to see included in a future issue? Drop a note at the Tip Line with your ideas!

MeegsC (talk) 09:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 May newsletter

The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:

• Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
• Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
• Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
• BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.
• FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

‘Lyken’ v incorrect ‘Litchen’

Dear MeegsC Re. your reversion of my edit on the Lichen page with the comment to the effect that ‘Just because you don’t pronounce it ‘litchen’ doesn’t make it incorrect!’ I maintain it IS incorrect because it doesn’t properly reflect the derivation from Greek which you and your fellow lichen fans have made plain on the page. I’m not generally a fan of American English, but in this instance I support wholeheartedly the American pronunciation ‘lyken’ as the only correct one. Flobbadob (talk) 10:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Flobbadob

And yet, Flobbadob, the Cambridge dictionary clearly shows that "litchen" is an acceptable pronunciation. We at Wikipedia are not arbitrators. If reliable sources say something, we report it neutrally. We don't proclaim it is "incorrect". I myself pronounce it 'lyken' – not that it really matters... MeegsC (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

And yet, MeegsC, I can’t help feeling that the Cambridge dictionary should know better…although, as you say, quite rightly, it counts as a reliable source. I know it doesn’t matter in any world-shaking sense : it’s just symptomatic of the inevitable evolution of language. I just don’t happen to like many of the ways in which English is evolving - the simplification (Americans would say ‘dumbing-down’), the loss of subtlety and nuance, the relentless Americanising of our mother tongue. I won’t bang on any further to the point of becoming even more of a bore. Good luck with your lichen research ( or as most people now insist on saying ‘RE-search’…)Flobbadob (talk) 13:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Just listened to the voice file on your Cambridge dictionary link. So ‘litchen’ is now the OFFICIAL U.K. pronunciation of the word, no less. God help us…Flobbadob (talk) 13:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda!

The Core Contest winners announced

The winners of the 2023 The Core Contest are announced 🎉. We had an amazing set of improvements this year, and the judges (Femke, Aza24 and Casliber) would like to thank everybody who joined and congratulate the winners.

• First place goes to Buidhe for improving The Holocaust; very core, highly relevant; their work on bringing geographical balance to the article puts the topic in a whole different light. We also commend improvements to sourcing and prose
• A close second place goes to Phlsph7 for improving Education from an unstructured jumble into a well-sourced piece of instruction
• Third prize goes to Johnbod for improving Donatello, a near five-fold expansion with great sourcing and fantastic imagery
• A tie for fourth place goes to Thebiguglyalien for improving Crime, for a strong improvement in sourcing
• A tie for fifth place goes to Sammielh for International law, improved by converting contextless listicles into a proper sourced prose

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 July newsletter

The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,
• Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
• Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.

Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Request for applications for position of Wikipedian-at-Large, Aotearoa New Zealand

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Spheniscidae list header

Template:Spheniscidae list header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Outline of lichens, and more

Hi Meegs,

Featured what?

Something interesting popped up in September in the article alerts section at the WikiProject Outlines page.

What happened with this: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Outline of lichens/archive1?

Is it supposed to be an archive page?

Is its candidacy still active?

WikiProject page

By the way, I've been updating/upgrading the WikiProject page. Feel free to take a look and make improvements.

Feedback requested

A user posted Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Deprecation of outlines, requesting feedback on whether or not he should make a proposal to get rid of outlines. You are obviously in tune with outlines, and perhaps you could explain there why they should or should not exist.

Could you check these out?

Now that you have some perspective on what a featured list outline should look like, I've been wondering if you would be willing to take a look at these, and, if you think they would make good candidates for FL status, maybe you could talk to the main editor about them?

Outline of underwater diving

Outline of underwater divers

Thank you

Due to the efforts of editors like you, there are over 900 outlines now, though not all of them are titled "Outline of", and not all of them are listed at Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines (yet).

Keep up the good work, and keep in touch.    — The Transhumanist   14:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Transhumanist. Yes, the FL for Outline of lichens is still live. I've been in the field for a month, so still have a few loose ends to tie up. I'm not sure it has enough reviews to pass the process though, so not sure what will happen next. But, regardless, it's always good to get a few more eyeballs on something! Once I start to get caught up on some "real world" paperwork (buried and way behind at the moment), I'll try to take a look at the outlines you've linked to in order to give my feedback. I looked at them when setting up the lichens outline, and was impressed. The big issue I can see right off the bat is the complete lack of references. That would currently make them a nonstarter in the FL process, but I imagine the Peter Southwood has access to most of the references he'd need to fix that. MeegsC (talk) 16:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Common pochard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incubation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Promotion of Outline of lichens

Congratulations, MeegsC! The list you nominated, Outline of lichens, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Congrats!    — The Transhumanist   08:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Outline of lichens

MeegsC,

I'm impressed. Very nice outline. Excellently done.

I've added a link to the outline at:

1. Category:Lichens
2. Lichenology#See also
3. Fungus#See also
4. Mycology#See also
5. Glossary of lichen terms#See also
6. Glossary of mycology#See also
7. Portal:Fungi#Topics
8. Template:Fungus
9. Wikipedia:Community portal#Community bulletin board
10. Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines#Examples of well-developed outlines
11. Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines#Announcements
12. Wikipedia talk:Outlines#We now have an outline that is a featured list: Outline of lichens
13. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Outlines#Featured list: Outline of lichens

I also checked to make sure that there are links here:

1. Outline of fungi Y
2. Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines Y
3. Lichen#See also Y
4. Wikipedia:Featured lists Y
5. Template:Lichens (no lichen templates)

You are invited to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines.

There's more info on outlines available at Wikipedia:Outlines.

We also have a template for creating outlines, called Template:Outline generator, which helps get outlines started. The first argument is the subject uncapitalized, and the second argument is the subject capitalized. If provided, those are inserted into the outline automatically. The syntax looks like this:

{{subst:Outline generator|subject|Subject}}.

It is best to avoid Draft space, because any draft that goes 6 months with no editing becomes subject to deletion.

Keep up the good work. I look forward to reading any future outlines you create.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   08:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

November lichen task force newsletter

Tip Line SYMBIOSIS: The lichen task force newsletter — November 2023 A look at what we've accomplished, working together
Our tiny task force is working to improve coverage of the world's lichens – unique symbiotic organisms composed of one or more fungal partners with one or more photosynthetic partners. They're found around the world, covering more than 7% of the earth's surface – from frigid polar areas to the steamy equator, from the edges of lapping seas to the highest mountains, and from city walls to the most pristine wilderness areas. They provide food and nesting material for myriad animal species, may be major players in the creation of soil from rock, and produce substances which may prove beneficial in our fight against pathogenic organisms. Want to learn more? Join us!	Articles of note New featured list: Outline of lichens (October 29) New good articles: Teloschistaceae (9 September) – a large family of mostly lichen-forming fungi Elke Mackenzie (18 October) – a noted British lichenologist who was also part of a secret WWII mission to Antarctica Teloschistes flavicans – the type species of the type genus of the family Teloschistaceae
Project news Esculenta has been on a tear recently and now has six articles under consideration for good article status: Anaptychia ciliaris, Buellia frigida, Chrysothrix chlorina, Placidium arboreum, Pulchrocladia retipora, and Punctelia. Esculenta has also submitted Teloschistaceae (which received its GA star in September) for consideration as a featured article. We now have articles about two additional noted lichenologists: Vitus Grummann and Oscar Klement. "Year of description" categories have been added to all genus and species articles. The number of genus and species articles continues to grow. We now have 935 articles about lichen genera and more than 2100 (including redirects) about lichen species. It's not all good news: The number of articles on our cleanup listing has also grown, with 5% of the task force's articles showing some sort of potential issue. These range from missing or unreliable sources to dead external links and orphaned articles. Some of these could probably be sorted relatively quickly, if you're looking for a fast way to help the project improve the quality of its coverage.
Newsletter challenge The "Phytochemistry" section in our Stereocaulon ramulosum is convoluted and virtually unreadable – and has had a "clarification needed" tag since July of 2022. The editor who whips this short section into shape (and the one who cleans up the associated references) will get public kudos in the next newsletter.
Got a suggestion? A correction? Something you'd like to see included in a future issue? Drop a note at the Tip Line with your ideas!

Delivered by MeegsC (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 November newsletter

The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-

• BeanieFan11 with 2582 points
• Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
• Epicgenius with 1518 points
• MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
• BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
• AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points
• Sammi Brie with 520 points
• Unlimitedlead with 5 points

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

• Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
• Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
• BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
• Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
• LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
• Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
• Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.

The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Kudos

			The Outline Barnstar and Featured List Medal
			are hereby awarded to MeegsC, for improving Outline of lichens to featured list status. The outline has earned a star, and now, so have you! Keep up the great work. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   01:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

And you have been added to the Outline WikiProject's Hall of Recognition    — The Transhumanist   09:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Cephalodium

Nice work on improving this important article! I hope you are planning on expanding it even more, perhaps to GA? Let me know if you'd like at some point to have a look at my own sources to see if there's more stuff that could be added. I'm working on a similar expansion to isidium; it's in my sandbox here, but it's still in a fairly crappy state. Perhaps you'd be amenable to peer-reviewing it later when it's ready before a GA submission? Esculenta (talk) 18:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

@Esculenta: Absolutely! I'm working on improving the lichen morphology article (see my sandbox here) and didn't want to be linking to stubs. I looked around to see what I could find relating to cephalodia and found all sorts of cool things. I'm hoping to get it to GA at some point, and will probably then move on to work on our cyanolichen article. And I'd be happy to peer-review isidium (which was next on my list!) if you wouldn't mind doing the same for cephalodia. ;) MeegsC (talk) 18:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December lichen task force newsletter

<--- Previous issue | Next issue ---> | Tip Line SYMBIOSIS: The lichen task force newsletter — December 2023 A look at what we've accomplished, working together
As 2023 draws to a close, we can look back with more than a modicum of pride on the progress we've made this year. We've added a few stars to our showcase with our first featured list and a handful of new good articles, created a plethora of new taxa articles, and added biographies for more than a dozen important lichenologists. We've resolved dozens of outstanding "cleanup" issues, and begun to polish some existing articles about various lichen structures. All in all, it's been a fairly productive year! Here's hoping that the coming holidays are happy ones, whichever you choose to celebrate.	Articles of note New good articles: Placidium arboreum (6 November) – a bark-dwelling lichen found primarily in the southeastern US Pulchrocladia retipora (23 November) – an intricately-branched coral lichen found principally in Australasia Anaptychia ciliaris (28 November) - a fruticose lichen found primarily in northern Europe and used for biomonitoring Placidium arboreum, also known as "tree stipplescale"
Project news Esculenta is still waiting for GA reviews to be completed for three articles: Buellia frigida, Chrysothrix chlorina, and Punctelia. MerielGJones has added articles about two noted Hungarian lichenologists who happen to be married to each other – Edit Éva Farkas and László Sándor Lőkös.
Newsletter challenge Kazamzam cleaned up the references for our Stereocaulon ramulosum article to meet part of the challenge issued in the last newletter. Unfortunately, the Phytochemistry section of that article is still a mess, just in case anybody feels motivated to complete the rest of the challenge! This month, we're looking for someone to take a look at the Malmidea article, which hasn't been updated since 2020. Since then, the number of species assigned to the genus has grown from the 52 listed in our article to the 68 listed by Species Fungorum (via the Catalogue of Life). The editor who updates the list will receive public kudos in the next newsletter.
Got a suggestion? A correction? Something you'd like to see included in a future issue? Drop a note at the Tip Line with your ideas!

Delivered by MeegsC (talk) 09:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Family

Hi Meegs, just wanted to let you know that "The Examplaceae are ..." is as correct as saying "Examplaceae is ...". The -aceae ending implies a plural form and so it's ok to use it like a plural in a sentence. There was a discussion about this in ToL talk some years ago (I've read all the archived talk at some point); I could try to hunt it down if you're not convinced. Found it here, and discussed here: WP:PLANTS/TAXONNUMBER Esculenta (talk) 00:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Okay! Just sounds weird to me – since it's basically saying "the family are" – but if it's agreed upon, I guess that's fine. MeegsC (talk) 09:55, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

Merry Christmas, MeegsC! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 14:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Why thank you Onel5969! Same to you! And a very happy new year... MeegsC (talk) 14:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)