User talk:MarcGarver/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Dear Author/QuiteUnusual
My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at the University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Helicobacter Pylori. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on [email protected]. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 13:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
Many thanks, QuiteUnusual, for keeping my personal pages free of vandalism. Pinethicket (talk) 21:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
|
These baklava are rich! Cdctmom1980 (talk) 12:46, 5 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, I just edited Exile on Main Street. It was me i just forgot to log in
Hi, so you deleted wat i posted, and I am aware that accolades of it being one of the best in music history are cited all over the page, so i thought i might as well not make a reference. so i will put it back up there, i hope that is a valid statement to make for the article. Karmonkey98k (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)karmonkey98k
- Well, it sounds a bit excessive, but let's leave it there and see what others think QU TalkQu 21:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --76.189.114.163 (talk) 22:05, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
What is criterial for spam link
I wrote a blog with very informative information about web application. Is spam link defined by the content of link or who added it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yajunliu (talk • contribs) 17:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Acceptable external links are defined by WP:EL and, as you will see under the section where it details links to avoid, blogs are not generally considered useful. Adding a link to a blog you wrote makes it more likely to be considered spam. QU TalkQu 21:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
dropped link
hi there, not sure i fully understand why, but you dropped a link to my blog article on reverse grads. i had thought this would be a useful addition to the original article, yet you claim it's spam. While slightly offended, I do feel this is a little harsh. I have nothing to gain from this action and was merely trying to offer additional content to a closely related topic. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts QU. Barney — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barneydelaney (talk • contribs) 22:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)