User talk:Fitzcarmalan/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks!

...for helping to solve a seemingly never-ending dispute on Talk:Yom Kippur War, for keeping the discussion soultion-orientated all the way, and for being really nice to work with :) Cheers! --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Death and state funeral of Nelson Mandela

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian Revolution of 2013, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Freedom and Justice Party and Ahmed Maher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Tunisia

2013–14 Tunisian protests → I hope this answers your question about the current events in Tunisia. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 15:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

And I guess that you have been reading all the statements there so you may have seen that I also wrote I would not aim to throw any stone to any wing and to any wiki user.
Therefore, I assume you did not misunderstand me. --Toksoz (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Brazil–Egypt relations was accepted

Brazil–Egypt relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Northamerica1000(talk) 10:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Fitzcarmalan. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fitzcarmalan. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quiet Storm (Aly & Fila album) (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Yom Kippur War

Would you mind keeping an eye on that article? User:Ersroitasent keeps breaking the 1RR and seems unwilling to discuss, and although I don't care much about reporting him, I would like the article to look decent. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 23:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Sure, i can take a look on how it is developing from time to time. As for this user, i have checked his talk page and it appears he was warned before. So do you think i should give him another warning or should i simply report him? I don't really know how to deal with similar behavior since and i don't want to engage myself in an edit war either. Thoughts? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
I really don't know. I very rarely bother to report or warn trolls, even though I probably should in some instances. By the way, thanks for stepping in. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 06:16, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Mass surveillance

WikiProject Mass Surveillance
Dear, Fitzcarmalan. We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Mass surveillance, a group of Wikipedians devoted to improving articles related to the privacy and global surveillance. If you're interested, consider adding yourself to the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage.

-- HectorMoffet (talk) 11:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Shortcut

File permission problem with File:Adly Mansour and Catherine Ashton in Cairo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Adly Mansour and Catherine Ashton in Cairo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Didn't you see this? Wasn't that the license given? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mostafa Mahmoud march heading to Tahrir Square II.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mostafa Mahmoud march heading to Tahrir Square II.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mostafa Mahmoud march heading to Tahrir Square.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mostafa Mahmoud march heading to Tahrir Square.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Fitzcarmalan. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 18:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Egyptian Revolution of 2013 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian Revolution of 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Revolution of 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.GreyShark (dibra) 19:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Gezi Park protests

Hey Fitzcarmalan, I'm sorry for replying so late. I'm very busy in the outside world and sometime go on & off in Wikipedia. I've been willing to nominate for a name change of the article. But I haven't had the time to even check the article for progress. I'll see what can I do, in a convenient time. Thank you

P.S. I saw your user page and I liked it a lot :) --Universal Life (talk) 02:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

No worries i can understand that. And thanks, appreciate it :) Fitzcarmalan (talk) 02:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

thanks for a note

I'm sorry for deletion the entry by mistake, I found my comment was duplicated, so unintentionally I erased it with the previous comment , I just fixed this mistake and thank you for the note.--Ibrahim.ID »» 05:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian Coup of 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Your non-neutral contribution to wikipedia

Hi, I think the contribution you make to wikipedia is biased and you are working for Egyptian government. I am totally against your views that are not of a neutral person. So I don't care if you revert my changes but I will continue to do so and make the things correct and neutral. Qjahid (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

You are making disruptive editing to wikipedia and the contribution are disruptive, please try to have consensus before you make things final and your wrong contribution may led to being blocked from editing. An example of it could be August 2013 Cairo sit-ins dispersal which should in reality be August 2013 Rabaa Massacre Qjahid (talk) 03:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Slashed personal attack and threats by a blocked sockpuppet. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 09:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian Revolution of 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

RE: ‎Egyptian Revolution of 2013

Pleasde dont threaten, it wont help you/ . Ive already mentioned its POV because of the title there that is in dsicssuin(Lihaas (talk) 19:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)).

When did i ever threaten you? I have nothing to threaten anyone with but you're the one who ignored all the discussions and since when does a title make a whole article POV. And also, why is the title POV? You never never gave any good reason because all you say is "POV fork". I was simply asking you to give a clear understandable argument, so don't try to make me look like the bad guy here. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Egyptian Revolution of 2013 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sanaa
List of revolutions and rebellions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ennahda

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Not revolution

[1] --Panam2014 (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Ok. I will contact admin for vandalism --Panam2014 (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

You are being disruptive. The RM was to change the title only, not content inside the article. Please don't edit war. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 15:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
You will blocked not me --Panam2014 (talk) 20:25, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Aswan tribal clashes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohamed Ibrahim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Ukraine

Hello Can you help me to traduce the English article Ukrainian revolution of 2014 ? [2] --Panam2014 (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Sure, i can help, but i don't think i'm allowed to translate an article with a similar shape. The orange tag needs to go and the disputes have to be resolved first so that it qualifies to be translated, i guess. I'm working on Habib Bourguiba and maybe soon on Muhammad Ali of Egypt because both are good quality articles. As soon as the problems are solved i will be glad to help. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Republic of Ukraine. Can you help me in this article of Ukraine between 1991 and 1996 ? --Panam2014 (talk) 07:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
You mean translating it from French to English, right? If so, can you kindly ask an editor you know on the French Wikipedia if i'm allowed to do so? I just want to make sure there is a green light and that i'm not breaking any rules. Thank you. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
This is what I ask. There is no need for authorization. You just say that the article was translated from French. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 Done but please add more references. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi all. I noticed this article pop up on my watchlist, and I'd like to continue the discussion of this article there. In short, there never was any "Republic of Ukraine." The declaration of independence of Ukraine named the state "Ukraine," and the interim constitution was that of the Ukrainian SSR of 1978 (which was subsequently modified, but the state was named "Ukraine"[3]) I see no need as for why this article would even need to exist. I suggest redirecting it back to where it was. § DDima 03:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
@DDima: - Hello and thank you for your message. As you can see, I didn't feel comfortable about doing this in the beginning and i'm not very familiar with the subject at hand. However, I believe now that it is valid in a certain way. If you feel otherwise, please consider inviting more editors to comment on this before making any decision like redirecting or opening an AfD discussion. Regards. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 11:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Can you translate this article ? [4] Thanks --Panam2014 (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Habib Bourguiba, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Monastir and Statesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Fitzcarmalan. You have new messages at Tokyogirl79's talk page.
Message added 04:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A couple notifications

As a result of a community decision, broad editing restrictions apply to all pages broadly related to the Syrian Civil War. These sanctions are described at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions and a brief summary is included below:
Sanctions may only be imposed after the user is notified sanctions are in effect. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged at Talk:Syrian civil war/General sanctions#Log of notifications.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to . Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:06, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Donbass People's Militia, you may be blocked from editing. Please refrain from edit warring with other users and be aware of WP:3RR Львівське (говорити) 15:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

@Lvivske: - You should certainly expect to have some of your edits challenged, especially when they are undue like this. So before you decide to "warn" me, please refer to discussing this on the article's talk page instead. And do tell me, when exactly did I violate the 3RR? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
As you were engaged in edit warring, it was simply a notice to be aware. --Львівське (говорити) 00:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Odessa in the campaignbox

Please read the discussion at Template talk:Campaignbox 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. I think my argument about including Odessa in the campaignbox is appropriate. EkoGraf (talk) 10:33, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Egyptian crisis

Hello, Can you create the articles in french wikipedia ? Thank you Fitz. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

@Panam2014: - I will be very busy in the coming weeks and i'm just a few days away from my exams, so I don't think I will be doing any translation soon. However, I will take a look once i'm done. Can you specify which article(s) you want me to translate? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 16:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

2014 Kramatorsk clashes

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Kramatorsk clashes your opinion here would be appreciated. Thank you. EkoGraf (talk) 20:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

@EkoGraf: - I have to check both articles first to see whether there really is content forking or not. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Forking there is. But that's because I used the material from those articles for this one and wanted to cut down those other articles so there wouldn't be any forking. But before I could do that, that editor started the ruckus of deletion and forking. So I clearly stated on the discussion page that I will hold of on cutting down those other articles until the issue is resolved. If other editors want to keep the article than I will cut down those other articles and there won't be any forking. EkoGraf (talk) 18:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
I understand your position, but I think it should have been discussed on Talk:2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine before making the decision. As you can see, it is a very sensitive topic at the moment and is top in the news, so splitting or forking content should be proposed there first, I think. I'm still not sure if it merits a stand alone article, because although I agree with SkoraPobeda over there about the necessity of sub-articles, i'm still tending to consider RGloucester's point that the events in the article might not be directly linked. Give me 24 hrs so I can closely check the articles and I will gladly give you my feedback there. Regards. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Seems we may be coming to an agreement thanks to Arbutus the tree, check out the talk. EkoGraf (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Campaignbox Ukraine

I have provided at the talk page sources showing the pro-Russians were armed, as well as the pro-Kiev guys and that both sides engaged in gunfights making it an armed riot. If you are still uncomfortable with this course of action, maybe we can compromise by separating Odessa in the campaignbox and marking it as Other like with the Afghan box, or mark the others in the box as military operations while Odessa under civilian unrest or some-such. EkoGraf (talk) 02:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Donbass People's Militia

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Donbass People's Militia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.


ChristopherDAOS (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

@ChristopherDAOS: - I don't know when and where did you come up from with that, but my last edit there was 2 1/2 weeks ago and was eventually uncontested, since the content in dispute did not meet the requirements of WP:WEIGHT and WP:LEAD among other issues. Also, this was going to be my last revert before bringing it up on the article's talk page. You're probably new here, so welcome, but please think twice before you attempt to blackmail other editors. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Morsi

Can you give me a summary of the Presidency Morsi with events? It is to write an article --Panam2014 (talk) 17:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

@Panam2014: - You want a summary of what he did throughout his presidency or a summary of what generally happened in Egypt during that time? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:17, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes Fitz. The two proposal. For french wiki in english or french. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
It will be ready by tomorrow maximum. Sounds good? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:17, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Are you finished ? --Panam2014 (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Finish ? --Panam2014 (talk) 20:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Are you finish? Panam2014 (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
I apologize for not being able to keep my word and finish it on time. I've been preoccupied with many other things in and outside of Wikipedia, but now I can say I'm partly free. I will try to update my thread on your talk page (in the French Wiki) as soon as I can. Thank you for understanding. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 13:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
When the work will be finished ? --Panam2014 (talk) 12:47, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Camille Lepage for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camille Lepage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Lepage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. damiens.rf 15:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit

ThaddeusB (talk) 14:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Researcher's Barnstar

Researcher's Barnstar
I am both pleased and honored to present you with the Researcher's Barnstar in appreciation for your superb work improving the article on the film WInter Sleep. Excellent work! Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:04, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  • The honor is mine, thanks a lot! :) Fitzcarmalan (talk) 09:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Ayman Nour

He became a member of the anti coup alliance ? Panam2014 (talk) 19:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Apparently he is → [5] Fitzcarmalan (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
he did not participate in the event on June 30? Panam2014 (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
He was Morsi's ally, so I'm sure he didn't. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 01:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
I became Islamist ? I remember in 2005 Essam al Eryan Muslim Brotherhood has demanded his release. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

help

Hi, look at my contributions, I want to request the removal of items inutilies but I do not know how. Can you help me?--Panam2014 (talk) 17:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't understand what the problem is. Can you specify, please? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
I do not know how to create the page to vote for the removal of these unnecessary pages. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Which unnecessary pages? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Egyptian Third Republic, Egyptian Fourth Republic, Egyptian Fifth Republic, Egyptian Third Republic and Arab Republic of Egypt (1971–2012) --Panam2014 (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Don't forget Arab Republic of Egypt (1971–2012). Panam2014 (talk) 18:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 Not done - I nominated Egyptian Third Republic, Egyptian Fourth Republic and Egyptian Fifth Republic because I am convinced they are WP:OR and that they were forked from other articles. But I think it would wiser to simply rename Arab Republic of Egypt (1971–2012) to History of modern Egypt (1971–2012) and disambiguate it. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
I am agree. Can you rename ? Panam2014 (talk) 19:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
I don't really feel comfortable about it, given that the article was already proposed for deletion. Perhaps someone like David O. Johnson knows what to do with this one? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
As it is I who made the request for deletion I withdraw to rename. Panam2014 (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 Done Fitzcarmalan (talk) 04:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Russo-Georgian War

I understand where you are coming from, but this article is soon to be GA reviewed. An RM isn't necessary, only a WP:RM/TR. Regardless, such an RM would be disruptive to the GA process. Wouldn't it be better to hold off until that process is complete? RGloucester — ☎ 01:36, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Minya court rulings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In absentia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Adly Mansour

Hi Have you got a photo of former President Adly Mansour ? regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:48, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't think there are any photos of him around here.[6] I'm also not on good terms with the image policy, so I don't think I can be very helpful on this. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Morsi

Hi Fitz Then you finish the job sources Morsi when? Because I'm writing the article? Thank you.

--Panam2014 (talk) 12:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

I will try to finish it in the next 2 days but I can't promise anything. The events that unfolded during Morsi's presidency are longer than I thought. In the meantime you can also take a look at 2012–13 Egyptian protests where you might find some helpful details. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Rollback

Done. Good luck and let me know if you have any questions. – Juliancolton | Talk 15:45, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, will keep that in mind. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 16:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Apologies

I just see I might have mangled an edit you made (moving refs) while making a large edit addition. I hope you can fix anything I might have disturbed. Cheers Nishidani (talk) 09:33, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done Fitzcarmalan (talk) 09:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Talk:August 2013 Rabaa Massacre

I am not an editing expert in Wikipedia but I have the right to defend myself. There was an accusation about my nationality and I wrote the truth. --Usaeedi (talk) 07:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

When I leave a message on your talk page, please reply to me there instead. You should also consider apologizing for your attacks as Qjahid before you decide to come here. Like I said to the other editor: You have the right to defend yourself on the accuser's talk page or by expressing yourself on your own user page. This doesn't belong to an article's discussion. I can go there and do the same thing as you did by saying whatever I want about myself then collapse the discussion, so again, I suggest you go remove it before someone else does. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 09:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Why are you not requesting the IP 197.163.18.204 to stop attacks on personality of another user Mr. Fitzcarmalan? I also made the Qjahid issue clear on the talk page. In Afghanistan we normally use one or two IPs in a large office have tens of computers connected to Internet through satellite connection. Please understand and stop the blame game. --Usaeedi (talk) 05:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
First of all, the 3 IPs are the same person and I asked one of them not to use the talk page as a forum. There is no "blame game" here. You know perfectly well how you abused your sock (see this and WP:ILLEGIT), but I don't care anymore and I'm not here to revive the past. Qjahid doesn't exist now. Usaeedi does. But apparently Usaeedi attempted to do the same thing Qjahid did [7] and has no intention to apologize. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 09:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (2014 Al-Wadi Al-Gedid attack) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2014 Al-Wadi Al-Gedid attack, Fitzcarmalan!

Wikipedia editor Rovine just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Could you please expand on article since you will be an expert?

To reply, leave a comment on Rovine's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Rovine, I just nominating the article on WP:ITN/C and will start working on it right away. Thank you for reviewing it. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for kindly volunteering! (Rovinemessage) 21:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

ITN for 2014 Chaambi Mountains attack

--SpencerT♦C 22:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Malaysia Airlines 17 is the second deadliest intentional sabotage

Can you name me one other incident involving a single aircraft with a higher number of fatalities? And I do not feel that I deserve to be blocked as it is a legitimate fact. Perhaps there is another link verifying it? Here is one:http://www.financialexpress.com/news/malaysia-airlines-mh17-shot-down-top-5-deadliest-attacks-on-airliners/1271130 What's wrong with this link?Undescribed (talk) 02:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quiet Storm (Aly & Fila album) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quiet Storm (Aly & Fila album), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Request

Hi Fitz, You know how to ask a merger to merge historical Abdullah al-Thani and Abdullah Theney? We must respect the author credit. You know how to make? He had to ask the admins to rename? And Morsi's it going? Thank you. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Correct me if I misunderstood, but do you want to rename the article to Theney? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 08:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
No, the other article is Abdullah Theney. No merge the 2 articles and name the article Abdullah al-Thani. --Panam2014 (talk) 09:40, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Abdullah Theney is a redirect. Forgive me, but I don't understand the issue here. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 09:57, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Can you make a request to move Abdullah Thani to Abdullah al-Thani ? Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 Done Fitzcarmalan (talk) 13:55, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

The New Suez Canal

Hello Man, I was thinking of adding the info about the new Suez Canal project but I am not sure if I should add that on the Suez Canal article or create a new article named The New Suez Canal. I am also looking forward to cooperating on this matter, So can you help me? Sinai Horus 〉〉〉 08:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

I heard about the announcement just minutes ago, so I don't know much regarding this yet, but I will see what I can do. If you think about creating a new article please make sure it is titled New Suez Canal project because it is something that is likely to happen in the future. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 16:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure, but I guess projects like Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam has its article with it's official name as the construction has already started same as the new Suez Canal's case. Sinai Horus 〉〉〉 22:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Aguila Salah Issa

Hi Can you create this article ? He is the new libyan president. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Libyan conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Stevens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Libyan National Army

I have noticed you removed the split Libyan National Army from one side of the ongoing conflict. I assume this to be a mistake so I am restoring it, though please let me know if it was intentional Contributorzero (talk) 19:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

I actually did intentionally remove the sub-brigades of the Zintanis because there are too many different militias involved in the conflict and if we keep adding all of them the list will be a mess. As for the brackets you added for the Libyan National Army on each side, then yes, you were right. I didn't notice that and you did well by adding them, apologies. You also did an excellent job in the background and the following sections, but I would really appreciate it if you cited some of the info you added. Thanks, Fitzcarmalan (talk) 22:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Libyan conflict

In that source, 901 deaths are recorded from 16 May onwards. If you are including the 61 special forces dead I wouldn't recommend that because those deaths are for the period January-July. 4 and 1/2 of those months were not part of the current conflict. Some probably died mid-May through July, but we don't know how much and that's why we put the +. EkoGraf (talk) 19:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I don't know, but based on my Excel calculation (without adding the special forces), it clearly shows 962 fatalities since the beginning of the conflict (May 16, 75 deaths, start of Haftar's operation). Tried it several times and it's always the same result. Please re-check your own calculations and do tell me if I went wrong, because to be honest I don't think I did. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I summed up the deaths, including the special forces, from January 1 until May 15, and deducted that from the total and got the 901 toll. I will summ up the deaths from May 16 up until today, maybe they got the overall toll wrong. EkoGraf (talk) 11:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

I figured out what the problem was. They are not including in the overall figure at the top of the table the 61 special forces members. That's why we were not alligned hehehehe. You're count was the right one. :) EkoGraf (talk) 04:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Use of word "terrorist"

are you saying it is wikipedia policy to not report that a parliament considers a group is terrorist? Contributorzero (talk) 16:53, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

It is undue weight for the the lead section, especially the first paragraph which is supposed to summarize the whole article. We have too many quoted partisan opinions there. We should let our readers digest the article for themselves, and not force them to decide whether these militants are considered terrorist groups or not per WP:NPOV. This is an unnecessary label that doesn't add much, and quoting it or saying according to won't change anything. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 00:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
The WP:NPOV argument does not support your edit. NPOV does not mean that nothing can be written which one side won't like, it means putting all the information and viewpoints readers might need. The reader is not being "forced" to do anything, just given an opinion, clearly presented as one group's opinion, presented in inverted commas. Shouldn't the reader should be free to read the facts and decide what they think of the label? Contributorzero (talk) 16:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I may have missed the point. Are you proposing that the information be deleted or moved elsewhere (e.g. the partisan viewpoint section)? By the way i have been looking forward to the Battle of Tripoli Airport, is that still a plan? Contributorzero (talk) 19:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
My main concern is that these viewpoints were possibly given undue weight in the lead section and add nothing crucial for the reader. And yes, they are definitely better off in their own section (perhaps "Domestic reactions").
As for the proposed article, yes it is still a plan, but unfortunately I won't be doing much about it in the next few days because I'm going on vacation tomorrow. For the moment you can create the article yourself if you want, and I will gladly help when I come back. But right now I just have some final errands to do here before I'm gone. Cheers, Fitzcarmalan (talk) 20:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Iraqi insurgency (2011–present) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {Move portions|2013–14 Islamic State offensive in Iraq and Syria)}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Those reversions you suggested I make

I you could figure out a better title, go ahead and change them.Ericl (talk) 20:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

It's not as easy as you suggest it, and like I said, we now have 2 articles about the same topic. Such massive changes like that can be considered highly disruptive and no procedural plan was discussed yet. You also blanked huge sections of Syrian Civil War spillover in Lebanon apparently without any discussion, not just the Iraq/ISIS articles. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 20:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
There haven't been any discussions on the Spillover page since February. The conflict is rapidly changing and we needed the room. I put in an explanation. The entire "Arab War" situation here is a mess, as you'd probably agree, and it reminds me a great deal of the 2012 campaign, the last time I got into trouble, when I was told the 2010 Democratic nominee for US Senator from Oklahoma wasn't notable. The Democratic nominee for Senator from anywhere is notable. Look at the timeline for the Syrian war this year. They just gave up.

Like I've said a dozen times, if you can find a better title, use it, I'd be thrilled. But the Jihadist War going on in Syria and Iraq, and sometimes Lebanon changed big time in December. Something had to be done, and aside from the title, I think I did a good job.Ericl (talk) 21:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Scientology in Egypt) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Scientology in Egypt, Fitzcarmalan!

Wikipedia editor SantiLak just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs Categories please add

To reply, leave a comment on SantiLak's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

 Done --Fitzcarmalan (talk) 04:13, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Campaignbox

Its not that I have no intention to respond, as you rudely implied, its simply that I did not see your message on my talk page because I get a dozen notifications a day and don't go through all of them. Back to the issue on hand. Too many notable battles happened as part of the insurgency during this period and removing them from the main campaignbox is simply not logical. Keep the new miniture campaignboxes at those articles pages instead of the big one, fine, I can be ok with that. However, the battles are notable enough that they warrant to be in the main campaignbox on the conflict. EkoGraf (talk) 23:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

@EkoGraf: - Too many notable battles is not really a valid argument in this case. In case you haven't noticed, I've kept the link to the 2014 escalation and the readers can easily navigate their way to the other campaignbox. If you really insist on maintaining them, we can incorporate the whole 2014 template to the main one, like Template:Campaignbox Afghan War, but of course we should keep the main box out of the 2014 articles.
I apologize if you were offended by my message, but this wasn't the first time my entries on your talk page were ignored. Some time ago you reverted an edit that I made (which was pretty much constructive, as far as I know) on the Syrian war infobox with poor reasoning. I then went to your talk page and I even took the issue to the Syrian civil war discussion page. I had to wait for seven days per WP:BRD till someone replies, but all in vain, and I frankly don't plan on waiting that long in the future. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
I would be ok with the Afghan model as long as the links for the battles can be also found in the main box. EkoGraf (talk) 20:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 Done --Fitzcarmalan (talk) 20:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi , can u please help me in retrieving the article Sant Jagjit Singh Harkhowal , as he is a religious leader of india

I really don't know what you're talking about my friend. Can you please elaborate a little further? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 01:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Syrian War Infobox Edits

I believe you broke the Syrian Civil War Active Sanctions-1RR rules by twice changing the infobox to move the Kurds into the regime column against consensus. If you continue this behavior I am sure you will be reported. Cheers Legacypac (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Against consensus, my ass. Next time you come up here with such crap this will go to ANI per WP:BULLY. The first edit does not count as a revert, and you should think twice before you come here threatening me and then sugarcoat this behavior with "cheers". Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Difference between Al and al-

Hi Fitz Can you give me arabic and english sources for the difference between Al and al- [8]. Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Right now I can't find any, but I believe the non capitalized version is more accurate, especially if it comes in the middle of a phrase or such long full names. If you insist on capitalizing, please consider hyphenating it at least. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Syria infobox

I'm arguing with that guy at the talk page about the infobox along the same lines you argued with him. He is really adamant in his POV. However, I think Kudzu1 has made a fairly balanced layout now in regards to the Kurds. EkoGraf (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for stepping in. I'm glad we got over this and Kudzu's variant seemed fine by me, until some editor messed it up again. Now it's Sopher (or Zenithfel) making redundant edits. Anyways, I believe I've dealt with the issue for now. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at the Village Pump

Hello! This message is to notify you that there is a discussion at the Wikipedia Village Pump that may be of interest to you. -Kudzu1 (talk) 17:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

ITN for Tunisian parliamentary election, 2014

--SpencerT♦C 08:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello

Is there a way to separate the Golan heights with a dotted line here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Syrian_Civil_War_infobox

The same way as can be seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Koban%C3%AE_Canton&oldid=633375406#ISIL_Attacks ?

You can reply here. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

@Supreme Deliciousness: Sorry about the late reply. I've noticed the discussion back at the Syrian Civil War talk page, so I take it you all reached a consensus on this. This is good news, but unfortunately I am not familiar enough with these map-related issues.
@MrPenguin20: what say you? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 00:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I'm being quite slow on the uptake tonight so, just to be clear, you're asking if it's possible to use a coloured dotted line (like in the Kobane map) to separate Israeli controlled Golan Heights from the rest of Syria? If so then yeah it's possible. Probably best someone else does it though - I'm not so neat with PNG's. MrPenguin20 (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Libyan Supreme Court

Hi The Parliament has been disolved. The parliament was dissolved . This means that the Prime Minister and the Speaker are in rebellion. Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:51, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Mislabeled image

Hello. I have added a section to the talk page of the article on [[Human rights in Egypt under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces ]] concerning the mislabeling of an image there. Please help with your opinion there.  Mahmood  03:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Muslim Youth Uprising

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muslim Youth Uprising requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tchaliburton (talk) 09:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Muslim Youth Uprising

This movement is just a part of the Post-coup unrest in Egypt (2013–14). I would make a merger request. Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Do you have any source(s) proving that this is part of the unrest in question? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 14:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Inter-civil war violence in Libya#Requested move

You have been involved in this article; I invite you to join in for consensus. --George Ho (talk) 06:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Fyi

  • I've responded to your call for peer review here. Wifione Message 17:34, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for convincing Dusti to amend the note. I would have tolerated a no consensus closure, but I've found this one to be pretty decent and less neglecting to the effort I've made in trying to convince the voting editors. I don't think I will renominate the article again though. Not in the next four to five months at least. This appears to be one of those topics where one would get his fingers burnt, despite strong evidence of original research, promotion, puffery, etc. Maybe I will get there when I have the energy for it, and maybe this would encourage the editors who participated in this AfD discussion to find RS in different languages in order to establish independent notability for the subject (though, if you ask me, I doubt they ever will). Thanks again for a well informed comment. I appreciate it. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:34, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fitzcarmalan/Archive_2&oldid=999297566"