User talk:Ervin111899

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ervin111899, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 02:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Ervin111899, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to National Grid Corporation of the Philippines have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:53, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Ervin111899

Speedy deletion nomination of Pulilan Regional Road[edit]

Hello Ervin111899,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pulilan Regional Road for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Stephreef (talk) 09:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Office of the President[edit]

Hello Ervin11899. I noticed your edits related to the Office of the President [of the Philippines]. Please note that the "Office of the President" may refer to the President of the Philippines himself in normal, everyday or casual conversation, it is in fact a legally defined entity separate from the President himself. See relevant article: Office of the President of the Philippines.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ervin111899. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Davao, Abra, Laguna, Kalinga and Isabela

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Hermosa-Balintawak Transmission Line[edit]

Hello, Ervin111899,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Hermosa-Balintawak Transmission Line should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermosa-Balintawak Transmission Line .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 07:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Ervin111899

April 2018[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to The powerpuff Girls, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This was a controversial move that you did without any discussion. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts[edit]

Hi, you seem to be using multiple accounts (this one and User:Ervin118) for no obvious reason. The general rule is one editor, one account. Please see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry for more information. Trivialist (talk) 17:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ervin111899, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Nanophosis (talk) 22:58, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ervin111899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not make and use multiple accounts again in Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You have known about our sockpuppet policy for more than a year. As such, your violations were clearly deliberate and you will need to address this before we can safely unblock you. Yamla (talk) 14:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How do I address this violation/s that I made?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ervin111899 (talk • contribs)

Only your unblock request should be formatted as an unblock request; standard questions or comments should just be posted in plain text. You address the violation by explaining why you chose to create multiple accounts when you had been made aware that doing so was wrong. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ervin111899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for making multiple accounts. The purpose for this is because in case I forgot a password, I will make another one on a another computer. Despite this, I promise that I will not do this anymore because it violates the rules of Wikipedia. Also, I will think first before I act.

Decline reason:

Per the below conditions, you didn't mention Ervin1111118 (talk · contribs), Ervin111111118 (talk · contribs) and Ervin111118 (talk · contribs). Therefore unblock request declined. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:50, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I initially declined this unblock request, see here for it, with the reason "Given that you were using two of the sock accounts in parallel over a period of many months, that seems unlikely." In light of the exchange below, I have reverted that decline, and I leave it for someone else to review. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why it is unlikely if I were using two of the sock accounts in parallel over a period of months? How do I solve this problem? Ervin111899

How can you have been using both accounts in parallel for so long if you had forgotten the password of one of them? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By not logging out both accounts on both computers. Ervin111899

Ah, what I've just discovered is that you can stay logged in for up to 365 days - I really hadn't realised it was that long. And, other than this (current) account, your other two were both active for periods shorter than that. So what you say does indeed appear to fit the evidence. I will shortly revert my decline of your unblock request and leave it for someone else to review. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • With all three accounts, you failed to communicate or ever respond to anything until you were blocked. That is an additional reason for blocking along with the sockpuppeting. Please explain. The different accounts combined with not communicating made this much harder for other editors than it had to be.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry for not responding. I promise that I will respond to any notification that come to Wikipedia as well as to communicate with other users. But the reason is continuing to make some information of an article correct and accurate. Ervin111899

Here's my deal. You disclose all accounts you have been using, which we will then block indefinitely, and promise to use this account only from here on. The offer is conditional on you disclosing everything; if we find additional socks you haven't told us about, the deal is off (and we can ask a checkuser to find them, so you need to be upfront and honest). Then I will unblock, on the strict condition that any further sockpuppetry will be met with an immediate reblock. (Pinging blocking admin Berean Hunter for comment). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me....add no anon editing to prevent IP socking.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I promise to only use this account and not doing sockpuppetry anymore. Ervin111899
I'm happy that this was inadvertent use of multiple accounts, and I support an unblock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Are you happy with this Berean Hunter? If so, may as well go ahead and unblock. I would, but am leery of undoing any CU actions period (at least without their express written consent if they are unable to do it themselves). --TheSandDoctor Talk 06:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As said above, I'm happy to unblock as soon as Ervin lists all the accounts he has been using. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:56, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The accounts that I had used before the block are:
Ervin111899 (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ervin111899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Accounts used before the block are: Ervin111899, Ervin118, Ervin1118, Ervin1111118 (talk · contribs), Ervin111111118 (talk · contribs), and Ervin111118 (talk · contribs).

Decline reason:

As below. SQLQuery me! 02:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ritchie333: - heads up, it looks like the editor provided the information you requested. SQLQuery me! 16:34, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...only after he left those accounts out and it got his previous request denied because of it. A little late now.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ervin111899 (talk) 11:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Follow the directions above. Praxidicae (talk) 13:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How? Because when I am listing similar accounts, the request was declined. Ervin111899 (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You need to list all the accounts you have used in one posting and explain why you created additional accounts when you were aware of policy not to. 331dot (talk) 15:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Accounts used before the block are: Ervin111899, Ervin118, Ervin1118, Ervin1111118 (talk · contribs), Ervin111111118 (talk · contribs), and Ervin111118 (talk · contribs). I created additional accounts when I was aware of policy not to because in case of forgetting a password when I logged out, I will create another one.Ervin111899 (talk) 15:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You will need to make another unblock request. The best thing to do is not forget your password in the first place, not make additional accounts. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do I list the accounts before the block again on an unblock request and the reason why I created additional accounts when I was aware of policy not to? Ervin111899 (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If your above list is complete, you can simply refer to it in your request, which is also where you should give your explanation, also stating what it is that you want to do if unblocked. 331dot (talk) 17:19, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

latest round of unblock discussion[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ervin111899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Accounts used before the block are: Ervin111899, Ervin118, Ervin1118, Ervin1111118 (talk · contribs), Ervin111111118 (talk · contribs), and Ervin111118 (talk · contribs). I created additional accounts when I was aware of policy not to because in case of forgetting a password when I logged out, I will create another one. I promised that if I am unblocked, I will not create additional accounts anymore and stick only into one account. The best thing that I can do is to remember my password. If I do not remember my password, I will use the forgot password feature at login to request a temporary password. Ervin111899 (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the apparent deliberate concealment of a block-evading account, I suggest that the standard offer is probably now your only route back to editing. Yunshui 雲水 15:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I feel the need to add that if one does not remember one's password, one uses the forgot password feature at login to request a temporary password. (It's what I do.) (struck)-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes.Ervin111899 (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  1. You haven't recently created another account that hasn't been mentioned here?
  2. It looks like you have been editing while logged out.
  3. Also, after my initial block for sockpuppetry on June 26, you used another puppet to seemingly threaten another user with "what you know about ..cartoon network ? If you revert again i will block u....fool ...scoundrel ...idiot"...my bolding. That blocking threat would pass for admin impersonation but...that isn't really another user is it? We can compare your account with your other account that you have failed to mention on this page before.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:41, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As of now, I stopped created another account. I edited pages while logged out but starting this time, I promise to edit only while logged in. The best thing is to not log out my account.Ervin111899 (talk) 03:48, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What has changed between your last unblock request, and now? SQLQuery me! 03:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
List of accounts that were used before the block. My latest unblock request is the list of accounts used before the block, reason why I am created additional accounts, promise to not create additional accounts anymore and stick only into one account, and know what will I do if I forgot my password which is to use the forgot password feature at login to request a temporary password. The best thing that I can do is to remember my password. Also, I promise that if I am unblocked, I will not use puppets to threaten other users.Ervin111899 (talk) 04:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But you were told to list all of the accounts and you have continuously left off BROTHmnhb. You have been evading your block by anon editing. I don't have confidence that you have listed all of your accounts. I believe that six months of no anon editing or socking would be in order per the standard offer.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 04:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry for anon editing and evading the block. Starting this time, I will not repeat these things anymore. Ervin111899 (talk) 09:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why is the standard offer being the only route back to editing? I want to edit now as long as I follow the policies and rules of Wikipedia and not repeat those mistakes again. Ervin111899 (talk) 17:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Standard Offer is detailed at Standard Offer. 331dot (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So do I meet those conditions first before I edit again?Ervin111899 (talk) 18:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes; refrain from editing and socking for six months,(starting from your last edit) pledge not to repeat the offensive behavior, and don't otherwise create a reason to object to your return to editing. It isn't a guaranteed pathway back, but it is your best chance. 331dot (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do I only apologize to not repeat those mistakes again after six months?Ervin111899 (talk) 18:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As stated at WP:SO, an apology is not necessary(though perhaps helpful), only a pledge that your behavior will change and your refraining from edits/socking for six months. It's not the case that if you do those things you are guaranteed to be unblocked, but it's a big step forward as it shows that you can respect Wikipedia policies and practices. 331dot (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How do I pledge to change my behavior?Ervin111899 (talk) 18:19, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
By saying "I pledge to change my behavior and not do (whatever got me blocked) again" and saying what constructive things you will do if unblocked. 331dot (talk) 18:22, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Ervin111899 (talk) 18:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019 Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ervin111899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I waited for six months without editing or sockpuppetry since my last edit in January 27, 2019 and not created any extraordinary reasons to object to a return while waiting for at least 6 months. So I now pledge to change my behavior and not do sockpuppetry and block evasion again. Also I will now start communicate to other Wikipedia users.

Decline reason:

Per discussion below. MER-C 17:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ervin111899 (talk)

Are you sure that these are the only accounts that you have ever created? This is important that you get this right because we need to know that we are getting truthful and complete answers from you. That is how trust is rebuilt. Now isn't the time to be either forgetful or evasive.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, these are the list of accounts that I have ever created or used before the block. Previously, I have only listed the accounts Ervin111899, Ervin118, and Ervin1118 and forgot to mention Ervin1111118, Ervin111111118, and Ervin111118 so the unblock request was declined by Ritchie333. I created another unblock request, this time listed the accounts Ervin111899, Ervin118, Ervin1118, Ervin1111118, Ervin111111118, and Ervin111118. It again declined and created another unblock request, also listing those accounts but declined by Yunshui. The reason why Yunshui declined the request is because given the apparent deliberate concealment of a block-evading account, the user suggested that the standard offer is probably now my only route back to editing. Ervin111899 (talk) 16:07, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So, what about Ejrdr11181999?
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
List of all accounts that I have ever created:
Sorry for not including the account Ejrdr11181999. I will now include this account on my list of accounts that I had created.

Ervin111899 (talk) 00:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, what about Abcdefghiklmnopqrstuvwxyz111899?
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 11:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
List of all accounts that I have ever created:
Sorry also for not including the account Abcdefghiklmnopqrstuvwxyz111899. I will now include this account on my list of accounts that I had created. Ervin111899 (talk) 11:33, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So, what about BROTHmnhb? What were you trying to do with this account?
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
List of all accounts that I have ever created:

Berean Hunter

Sorry also for not including the account BROTHmnhb. I will now include this account on my list of accounts that I had created. I had continuously left off BROTHmnhb so I had evaded my block by anon editing. I also used another puppet to seemingly threaten another user. I will not do sockpuppetry and block evasion again. Also I will not use another puppet to seemingly threaten another user again. Ervin111899 (talk) 12:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Based on all the omissions of the accounts that you didn't mention, I don't have faith that we would get (or have gotten) the complete truth to your history with accounts or other situations that may come up. It shouldn't be that hard to get truthful answers from you and it undermines trust. I suggest that you spend the next six months working on a different Wikimedia project with only one account and when you request the standard offer next time, you should be more forthcoming about how you used the sock accounts.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I will spend the next six months working on a different Wikimedia project with only one account and when I request the standard offer next time, I should be more forthcoming about how I used the sock accounts. Also I will repeat waiting for six months without anon editing or sockpuppetry in English Wikipedia. Ervin111899 (talk) 00:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Philippine five peso note on Powerpuff Girls reboot episode Presidential Punchout.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Philippine five peso note on Powerpuff Girls reboot episode Presidential Punchout.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ervin111899 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I waited for six months without editing or sockpuppetry since my last edit in August 8, 2019 and not created any extraordinary reasons to object to a return while waiting for at least 6 months. I edited other Wikimedia projects (i.e. Wikimedia Commons and Tagalog Wikipedia) using only one account during my wait for six months from August 2019 to February 2020. So I now pledge to change my behavior and not do sockpuppetry and block evasion again. Also I will now start communicate to other Wikipedia users.

Accept reason:

Accept per the standard offer and ROPE. Good luck in your editing endeavors.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited May Bukas Pa (2009 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're welcome. Sorry for adding a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna when I recently edited May Bukas Pa (2009 TV series). Ervin111899 (talk) 12:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Ervin111899

Thank you for creating List of May Bukas Pa episodes.

User:WikiAviator, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

No RS at all. IMDB is NOT RS. Article not tagged because it is quite new. Please improve swiftly.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

WikiAviator (talk) 07:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiAviator: Hi. You're welcome. Ervin111899 (talk) 07:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Original research[edit]

@Ervin111899: I highly encourage you to cite your contributions, especially on transmission line articles, as these may be perceived as original research. I recently tagged some of your articles with the {{Original research}} tag as they seem to be filled with original research. Thanks. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North Luzon Expressway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valenzuela.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pulilan Regional Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pulilan Regional Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulilan Regional Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tai-pan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. In the future, I will use the preview button before I save my edit; so that I will find any errors I have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Ervin111899 (talk) 07:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Concepcion–Clark Transmission Line for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Concepcion–Clark Transmission Line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concepcion–Clark Transmission Line until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary[edit]

Learn how to provide edit summaries. Thanks. –Ctrlwiki (talk) 13:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thank you and you're welcome. Ervin111899 (talk) 13:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! —Ctrlwiki (talk) 08:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Every time I edit, I will add a summary. Ervin111899 (talk) 08:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are using edit summaries incorrectly. though, I appreciate your response. the summary does not need to be long. for example, when you change something, just put in the summary "change" or "i changed something". just brief summarization. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 08:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Just only short edit summary. Ervin111899 (talk) 08:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cartoon Network, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 15:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I must not add or change content like what I did at Cartoon Network, without citing a reliable source. I will review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you and you're welcome. Ervin111899 (talk) 17:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please give descriptive edit summaries. "Edited an article" is not helpful at all. Trivialist (talk) 21:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I must become specific in providing edit summaries. Ervin111899 (talk) 04:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your last few summaries are much improved. Thanks! :) Also, I apologize for any confusion from my comment. I didn't see the previous commenter who said that just saying "i changed something" was sufficient. While they meant well, the edit summary should be meaningful. And as I said, your last few edit summaries are great, so just keep doing that. :) Trivialist (talk) 22:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, my last few summaries are much improved. I will continue to provide edit summaries that are specific. Thank you and you're welcome. Ervin111899 (talk) 05:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you just repeat people's messages back to them? Trivialist (talk) 22:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, Trivialist that I just repeat people's messages back to them. I will now change my comment. Thank you and you're welcome. Ervin111899 (talk) 22:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of E-Boy episodes[edit]

I'm sorry for my wrong edit summary on this revision of List of E-Boy episodes where I thought that I removed the episode table of Ikaw ay Pag-Ibig so I mentioned "Removed episode table of Ikaw ay Pag-Ibig" in this revision but actually it is not. I already removed an episode table of Ikaw ay Pag-Ibig on the next revision of this page thus I mention in this revision as "Removed episode table of Ikaw ay Pag-Ibig." Ervin111899 (talk) 10:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mutya episodes moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of Mutya episodes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 10:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution at ABS-CBN[edit]

Hi! I provided retroactive attribution in the edit summary of this diff for the content you moved from ABS-CBN Corporation. For future copying or moving of text between articles, just be sure to note it in the edit summary (with a wikilink to the original page). This is needed to satisfy attribution requirements as described at WP:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 22:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DanCherek. Yes, I must provide retroactive attribution in the edit summary if I copy or move of text between articles and make sure to note it in the edit summary with a wikilink to the original page. Thank you and you're welcome. Ervin111899 (talk) 22:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of May Bukas Pa guest stars moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of May Bukas Pa guest stars, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~StyyxTalk? 23:04, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already created the page List of May Bukas Pa guest stars and submitted the draft of Draft:List of May Bukas Pa guest stars. Ervin111899 (talk) 08:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Mutya episodes (July 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Mutya episodes instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 23:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ervin111899! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 23:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ikaw ang Liwanag at Ligaya[edit]

I'm sorry for my wrong edit summary on this revision of Ikaw ang Liwanag at Ligaya because while I am adding edit summary for my edit of Ikaw ang Liwanag at Ligaya page, I accidentally press the key that opens my submitted work or edit of a page on a new window. I reverted the page to previous revision. I edited and submitted the page again with the correct edit summary (en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ikaw_ang_Liwanag_at_Ligaya&oldid=1105874311). Ervin111899 (talk) 05:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) You're replying to yourself lol. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:53, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I am just apologizing for my wrong edit summary. Ervin111899 (talk) 05:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Length of CSID's of ABS-CBN/GMA/TV5[edit]

What length of CSID of ABS-CBN/GMA/TV5 will get to add it to their Wikipedia article, music video or lyric video? SeanJ 2007 (talk) 06:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Length of CSID of ABS-CBN/GMA/TV5 will get to add it to their Wikipedia article, music video or lyric video is determined by searching them at YouTube which will display a video of a CSID of ABS-CBN/GMA/TV5 with their length on a search result screen. Ervin111899 (talk) 06:08, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I mean on what video, original music video or lyric video? SeanJ 2007 (talk) 06:50, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Any video, original music video, or lyric video of respective CSID of ABS-CBN (posted by ABS-CBN Entertainment YouTube channel)/GMA (posted by GMA Network YouTube channel)/TV5 (posted by TV5 Philippines YouTube channel) on YouTube. Ervin111899 (talk) 07:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Just Love Ngayong Christmas has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 05:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. My edit to Just Love Ngayong Christmas has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If I am the copyright holder, I will read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading my material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. I may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—I must write using my own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of the copyright policy will be blocked from editing. So I must be careful with what I add to Wikipedia. Ervin111899 (talk) 06:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zaijian Jaranilla article format[edit]

Hello, hope you are having a nice day.
I just want to raise few points regarding your repeated reformatting of Zaijian Jaranilla Career section.
1. The "2006-2008: Early Work" that you are always creating is not significant, so it does not need separate section unless we include projects that gave significant change to his career. This section cannot stand alone as i have mentioned on my previous revert. That is why i have included until 2014 since most of his early projects are within 2009-2014.
2. Jaranilla was a talent of RDB since 2004 as proven by verified sources, not 2006.
3. The section "Acting stint" looks like a joke. It looks like a fanpage rather than an encyclopedia page. Check good articles like Marian Rivera, Judy Ann Santos or Beyonce and you will notice how Career sections are being made.
4. Please raise your concerns on the talk page first, rather than reverting every time we are reformatting his article so other users ca suggest too.
Thank You. jmarkfrancia (talk) 15:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I hope I have a nice day. I am sorry for my edits in Zaijian Jaranilla page. I now know that the "2006-2008: Early Work" that I always creating is not significant so it does not need separate section unless including projects that gave significant change to his career. This section cannot stand alone as mentioned on the previous revert. That is why the section is included until 2014 since most of his early projects are within 2009-2014. I also now know that Jaranilla was a talent of RDB since 2004 as proven by verified sources. Also sorry for the section "Acting stint". I will now name the section that fits into an encyclopedia page. I will also now edit the page only if I have corrections to the page and add any information as long as it is correct or much better I must raise my concerns on the talk page first rather than reverting every time reformatting his article so other users can suggest too. So sorry for all my edits on Zaijian Jaranilla page. Thank you and you're welcome. Ervin111899 (talk) 16:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Just Love Ngayong Christmas for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just Love Ngayong Christmas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Love Ngayong Christmas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Budoy episodes moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of Budoy episodes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 05:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. If I feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, I will click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thank you. Ervin111899 (talk) 08:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Budoy episodes (October 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Budoy episodes instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 06:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Studio 23 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, it is undesirable to do "cut-and-paste move" because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, I will use the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history. I will able to move an article myself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If I cannot perform moving a particular page, I will follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, I will list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you also and you're welcome. Ervin111899 (talk) 12:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries[edit]

Hello Ervin111899. I notice that when you edit you put an edit summary which is of almost no value to your fellow editors, as you simply say something like, "Edited xx section of Yyy page". We know what page you edited, as the history and the diff showing your edit both show the page name; what would be more valuable would be a description of what you did, something like, "Typofix" or "Added reference" or "Removed questionable information". Do you see the difference? In several sections further up this page you have been given advice about summaries, you appear to agree to follow it, and then don't. I suggest you read WP:EDITSUMMARY and take its recommendations to heart, and change your practice to make it easier for the rest of the community to edit with you. Happy days ~ LindsayHello 18:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Lindsay. From what edit summaries that I had made on various pages, they are only the same each time I edit that page (i.e. Edited (Wikipedia page name)/(section of a Wikipedia page). Yes. I will change my practice to make it easier for the rest of the community to edit with me by providing summaries that what I am really done to a particular Wikipedia page and more specific, providing different summaries each time I edit a page, and following recommendations from the WP:EDITSUMMARY. Happy days too. Thank you. Ervin111899 (talk) 19:11, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apalit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angeles.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will change the link to a specific page. Ervin111899 (talk) 08:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Cartoon Network, Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will change the link to a specific page. Ervin111899 (talk) 15:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Date precision in |previous_post= of {{Infobox Christian leader}}[edit]

Hello @Ervin111899. I am @Archer1234. I noticed some recent edits that have added the month and day to the previous posts listed for various Catholic prelates: [1] [2] [3].

MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE states [...] the purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article [...] The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance.

The addition of months and days for the |previous_post= values struck me as being overly-precise; that is, precision where it is not needed. The key information is, of course, the position itself. Adding the duration and chronological ordering, if known, is helpful to readers, but I do not see any increased value, in the general case, of adding anything beyond just the years. In my view, the years alone satisfy this need. Precise dates are (or could be) stated in the body of the article (as I think they are in each of the articles linked above), so there would be no loss of information by not including them in the infobox.

What do you think? Thanks.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 16:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I must change the dates to simply years for each Roman Catholic bishops or archbishops. Thank you and you're welcome. Ervin111899 (talk) 04:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hermosa–Duhat–Balintawak Transmission Line for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermosa–Duhat–Balintawak Transmission Line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermosa–Duhat–Balintawak Transmission Line until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mexico–Hermosa Transmission Line for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mexico–Hermosa Transmission Line, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexico–Hermosa Transmission Line until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EDSA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already changed the link from Laguna to Laguna (province). Ervin111899 (talk) 18:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Concepcion–Clark Transmission Line for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Concepcion–Clark Transmission Line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concepcion–Clark Transmission Line (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note about cut-and-paste moves[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution.

If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself by using the "move" button (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. SilverLocust 💬 05:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. And I will request for a delete on a page with redirect to another page so that only the currently-named page is used or focused. Ervin111899 (talk) 05:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of requesting deletion, use Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests (if the move you want to perform is non-controversial) or open a requested move (if potentially controversial). SilverLocust 💬 05:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I will use Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests (if the move I want to perform is non-controversial) or open a requested move (if potentially controversial). Otherwise, I will only copy and paste from my final revision of List of May Bukas Pa episodes to the current List of May Bukas Pa episodes, chapters, and specials and all edits made in the latter will not be anymore moved to another page and only stay in the current page. Ervin111899 (talk) 05:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Primetime Bida" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Primetime Bida has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 26 § Primetime Bida until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 19:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ervin111899&oldid=1215724313"