User talk:Elli/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 ← Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 → Archive 13

Concern regarding Draft:2026 United States elections

Information icon Hello, Elli. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2026 United States elections, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award

The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award

For over 360 article reviews during 2021. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi Elli,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mayajalam (disambiguation)

Notice

The article Mayajalam (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2020

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2020. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply (with a ping) to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Question from Feiton Arries on Talk:Paltas Canton (10:28, 30 August 2022)

hello mentor can i please ask for your help ? --Feiton Arries (talk) 10:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Question from Feiton Arries (10:32, 30 August 2022)

hello mentor how can i add my personal information about myself ? --Feiton Arries (talk) 10:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

@Feiton Arries: hi, I'm not quite sure what you'd like to do? You can add some info about yourself to your userpage, which is at User:Feiton Arries, but in general Wikipedia isn't meant to be a site to share information about oneself. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Question from Ulysses 981-93.09 (02:09, 7 September 2022)

Hello, why is Ruby so hot? --Ulysses 981-93.09 (talk) 02:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

@Ulysses 981-93.09: I'm not sure what this question has to do with Wikipedia... Elli (talk | contribs) 02:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2026 United States elections

Hello, Elli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2026 United States elections".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Question from Sa6h9hheje (07:32, 10 September 2022)

If you want some marve a page --Sa6h9hheje (talk) 07:32, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

I mean merge Sa6h9hheje (talk) 07:33, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Question from Faiz writz (14:23, 14 September 2022)

how do I edit an article --Faiz writz (talk) 14:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

@Faiz writz: you should be able to find an edit button, depending on the platform you're on. Click that, make your changes, and then save them. Help:Editing explains more in detail. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Recent edit to Kiwi Farms

Posted a discussion request in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kiwi_Farms#Relevance_of_nationality, thank you. Lizthegrey (talk) 20:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Mohammad Qasim

Thanks for closing Talk:Mohammad Qasim (Balochistan politician)#Requested move 13 September 2022. It looks like there was a bit of confusion over which Qasim is the one from Balochistan: the one you moved to Mohammad Qasim (Balochistan politician) is actually from Mardan District in the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, not Balochistan. (The one from Balochistan is Muhammad Qasim (senator).) Perhaps you'd consider moving Mohammad Qasim (Balochistan politician) to either "Mardan politician" or "Khyber Pakhtunkhwa politician" instead? Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

@Extraordinary Writ: Oh, my apologies. Thanks for the note, I'll go ahead and move the article now. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

There is a mop reserved in your name

You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already!

— TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I'm inclined to support this too but I've had a look at your editing history. Just to be sure, you may wish to consider going through WP:ORCP first. Absolutely not an obligation though. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

  • +1 to TNT placing this template here. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 06:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Question from NewYorkFan212 (17:57, 8 October 2022)

Hi, I just submitted an article for review but someone commented that I needed to disambiguate the title. Can I do this by putting Robbie Simpson (actor) ? --NewYorkFan212 (talk) 17:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

@NewYorkFan212: that would be a good choice for the title, yes. The person who accepts the draft should do that when they publish it. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello

umm... hi Elli, so here in Wikipedia are we allowed to make pages, from scratch Idulton 123 (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

@Idulton 123: yes, but you need to be autoconfirmed to do so (your account needs to be 3 days old and have 10 edits). Elli (talk | contribs) 22:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
@Elli thank you Idulton 123 (talk) 22:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

I'm impressed

You thanked me for editing your own input. Reflects well upon you as someone whose concern is for the best result, not personal credit. Thumb's up to you. Matza Pizza (talk) 06:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

@Matza Pizza: thanks! Definitely don't think my writing is flawless or anything so I appreciate anyone who puts in effort to improve it :) Elli (talk | contribs) 15:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Hurricane Shark

On 20 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hurricane Shark, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "the Hurricane Shark is real"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hurricane Shark. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hurricane Shark), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

DisamAssist on 2022 UK government crisis

Hey Elli. I noticed that you've got a semi-automated run going fixing the disambiguation links after the creation of the 2022 United Kingdom government crisis DAB page. I was processing these slowly by hand after I noticed no-one else had started onto em. Out of curiosity, does your script keep a track of which wikilinks also had piped text? I noticed on David Mundell, and a couple of other pages, that because of the successive crises the piped text also needed updating to make it clearer which crisis was being referred to. Or is that something you'll verify manually at the end? Sideswipe9th (talk) 00:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

I was going through these with DisamAssist. In general this doesn't keep track of that, but I'm happy to manually verify which ones need to be updated if you'd like me to. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Ah cool. If it's not too much trouble that'd be awesome. Even if you can't fix em all yourself and leave a list for me that'll help a lot :) Sideswipe9th (talk) 00:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
@Sideswipe9th: alright, think I got them all now. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Amazing, thanks Elli! Sideswipe9th (talk) 01:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Have a cuppa on me!

For cleaning up the DAB mess left by successive UK government crises! Sideswipe9th (talk) 01:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
@Sideswipe9th: Thanks! Elli (talk | contribs) 01:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Hope you are well

Hope all is well.

I just posted an appeal to my topic ban at the administrators noticeboard. You were supportive in my last appeal, and I would appreciate if you could share your rationale for having done so to the discussion of my current appeal (the last saw no consensus in its closure). Perhaps even review my latest appeal and consider sharing whether or not you would again support lifting my topic ban.

Best wishes. SecretName101 (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Question from DGNewt (03:29, 30 October 2022)

Entry for Phillies player Brandon Marsh. The personal section doesn't seem appropriate as it all pertains to a relative's accomplishments. Should I remove it? --DGNewt (talk) 03:29, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

@DGNewt: yeah, it would be reasonable to remove or at least trim it down a bit, given that she doesn't have her own article. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 1990 Arkansas Amendment 3

Hello! Your submission of 1990 Arkansas Amendment 3 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Onegreatjoke (talk) 15:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter

The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is

  • England Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
  • Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
  • New York City Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
  • Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
  • United Nations Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
  • Chicago PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
  • Toronto Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.

  • England Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
  • United Nations Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
  • Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
  • Toronto Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
  • SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
  • England Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
  • Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
  • Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for 1990 Arkansas Amendment 3

On 8 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1990 Arkansas Amendment 3, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that it took Arkansas 34 years to repeal a constitutional amendment opposing racial integration? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1990 Arkansas Amendment 3. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1990 Arkansas Amendment 3), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Nice job with 1990 Arkansas Amendment 3 and promoting it to the Main Page (DYK). Your coverage of this unrepresented area of Wikipedia is immensely appreciated! MX (✉ • ✎) 19:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! Elli (talk | contribs) 19:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Question from ColdSphinx (22:38, 9 November 2022)

Hello! --ColdSphinx (talk) 22:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

{{Copyvio-revdel}}

Hi Elli! I see that your edit to {{copyvio-revdel}} was attempting to hide the banner from logged-out users. It could just be on my end somehow, but I don't seem to be able to see the template even when I'm logged in. Do you have the same issue? Graham (talk) 05:11, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

@Graham11: No, it shows up for me just fine. Try using safemode and see if it's still an issue? Might be a userscript/userstyles thing. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Huh, yep, safe mode seems to fix it. You wouldn't happen to have any idea what script might be causing it, would you? (I think these would be all the relevant pages: common.css, common.js, vector.js.) No worries if not. Graham (talk) 05:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
@Graham11: No idea, sorry. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Citizens for Sanity

On 13 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Citizens for Sanity, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Citizens for Sanity PAC, opposing "woke insanity", ran ads saying "vote progressive this November"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Citizens for Sanity. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Citizens for Sanity), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 10,895 views (454.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 06:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Citizen Ballot measures

Hi, i am just wondering i saw you made the page of 2020 Alabama Amendment 1 (Thanks for doing it) and becouse of that i was wondering when you have time can you make a page On similar Citizen Ballot measures such as Ohio Issue 2, Citizenship Voting Requirement Amendment (2022)[1], Florida Amendment 1, Citizen Requirement for Voting Initiative[2], Louisiana Amendment 1, Citizen Requirement for Voting Measure (December 2022)[3], Colorado Amendment 76, Citizen Requirement for Voting Initiative[4] and North Dakota Measure 2, Citizen Requirement for Voting Initiative[5]. Thanks. La lopi (talk) 10:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

@La lopi: I've made articles on many ballot measures. Not particularly interested in writing these, but you can if you'd like. Elli (talk | contribs) 11:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://ballotpedia.org/Ohio_Issue_2,_Citizenship_Voting_Requirement_Amendment_(2022)
  2. ^ https://ballotpedia.org/Florida_Amendment_1,_Citizen_Requirement_for_Voting_Initiative_(2020)
  3. ^ https://ballotpedia.org/Louisiana_Amendment_1,_Citizen_Requirement_for_Voting_Measure_(December_2022)
  4. ^ https://ballotpedia.org/Colorado_Amendment_76,_Citizenship_Requirement_for_Voting_Initiative_(2020)
  5. ^ https://ballotpedia.org/North_Dakota_Measure_2,_Citizen_Requirement_for_Voting_Amendment_Initiative_(2018)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2028 Pennsylvania elections

A tag has been placed on Category:2028 Pennsylvania elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Elli. Thank you for your work on 2026 Georgia gubernatorial election. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lana Rhoades has been accepted

Lana Rhoades, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:35, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Question from Bg Mic (00:37, 1 December 2022)

I want to create a musical biography page on Wikipedia how can I do that --Bg Mic (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

County Borders in Election Maps

Hi Elli, I just wanted to ask you about the broader changes made to the standard maps used on wikipedia. Namely the decrease in the size of county borders as compared to the previous versions. Older maps are being updated with the new style guide as well. I don't have a problem with any of this, I was just curious if there was a concensus reached on these changes or if it's just indiviudal users aligning their edits. Gordfather69 (talk) 04:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

@Gordfather69: There have been a couple discussions had about this, but I don't recall one being conducted in a centralized location on-wiki. There isn't really a clear place to seek consensus, nor a clear need to do so (there was a inconsistent mess of maps used previously, and no one had really established consensus for any of them). I intended to have a centralized discussion before mass-replacing many of the old maps, but some editors are a bit more enthusiastic about this than I am. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from Ro Dereemr (00:54, 10 December 2022)

Hello Elli, Thank you being a mentor here on Wikipedia! I am actually really behind in editing my article and I literally cannot retain knowledge on how to edit things on here very well (I have dyslexia) My main question was to ask how to put in a category for an existing article, it pertains to adding a section about architectural style of a particular city. I tried to add a portion within the article but It isn't showing me where I made the edit, I wanted to include different styles of homes and interesting facts from style aesthetics from a few historic documents I was able to find from the 1800s. If you can help that would be most appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ro Dereemer (talk • contribs) 08:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

@Ro Dereemer: Hi! According to your edit history, you haven't made edits to any articles yet.
Categories are near the bottom of the page's source text. Given what else you've said it seems like you should be focusing on editing the page's prose vs details like the categories, at least for now. Do you have an issue figuring out how to do that? Elli (talk | contribs) 09:13, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from Cerulean Depths (17:11, 7 December 2022)

Hi Elli, thanks for participating in the mentor program. I have been making minor edits to random articles as an IP for a couple of months from the community portal, etc. Eventually I would like to greatly expand a couple of articles that I found very interesting and may need some additional guidance at that point. But for now, I just wanted to say hi! --Cerulean Depths (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

@Cerulean Depths: Hi! Glad you've been contributing; feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, are you able to help with this? I was too shy to ask for the article to be deleted in the first place but now it seems like a better choice than merging. Thanks! Cerulean Depths (talk) 16:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
@Cerulean Depths: Sure. The easiest solution here would be to blank and redirect the page to MAN SE, which is basically merging but without copying any of the contents. If that gets disputed, you could nominate it for deletion at articles for deletion -- let me know if you need help with doing either of these. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Done, I think that worked okay. Cerulean Depths (talk) 19:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
@Cerulean Depths: yep, looks good! Elli (talk | contribs) 20:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Please review my page when you get a chance?

Hi Elli, I hope you're having a good day. You have reviewed three of my pages in the past, Midnight Blue (Love Streaming), Waterfall and Cosmos. I was wondering if you could please review my new page Love or Loved when you get a chance? Thank you so much. —Bostonite01310 talk | contribs 02:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

@Bostonite01310: looks like it's already been reviewed. Just curious, have you considered nominating these for did you know? It's a good way to get more eyes on your page and to get some recognition for your effort. Since your article was moved to mainspace within the past seven days, it still qualifies, and it's more than long enough. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Oh thank you for informing me! How do I nominate the page? Thanks —Bostonite01310 talk | contribs 01:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
@Bostonite01310: the info at WP:DYKNOM should explain it; let me know if you have any questions. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! Do I need to review an existing nomination to be eligible to nominate my own article? —Bostonite01310 talk | contribs 01:52, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
@Bostonite01310: not yet, since you haven't nominated any articles yet. You only need to do that after you've made a few nominations. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Ah I see. Thanks! I have submitted my nomination now. —Bostonite01310 talk | contribs 02:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
@Bostonite01310: awesome! Elli (talk | contribs) 02:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from Cerulean Depths (16:29, 15 December 2022)

Hi Elli, I have a question about a way to contribute. Is it okay to go to other language wikis, use an online translator (I don't speak anything but English) and then create new Enwiki pages with clear grammar? I think there are rules about attribution when copying from other articles. Does that apply to copying across wikis? Is it discouraged? Let me know if I should ask at Teahouse/Help Desk instead. Thanks! --Cerulean Depths (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

@Cerulean Depths: yes, you need to attribute the article. I would suggest you not do this, if you cannot verify the sources yourself. There isn't necessarily a policy against this but there have been cases where low-quality translations cause a significant amount of disruption. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:38, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, that makes sense! That was something I was worried about - that I could access and read the sources but not be able to properly assess them due to lack of understanding of the background and culture associated with them. Cerulean Depths (talk) 19:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
@Cerulean Depths: Yeah! It's best to start somewhat cautious and stick to topics you're comfortable with and branch out later as you get more editing experience, imo. Editing out-of-your-depth can be quite frustrating. I don't work much on medical articles for this reason for example (we also have stricter guidelines surrounding them). Elli (talk | contribs) 19:55, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 18:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
@Bruxton thank you! Best wishes to you as well. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:30, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Question from Finnboi11 (18:51, 1 January 2023)

Hello! I made a draft today and I signed up after I had written it and I don't know how to publish the draft. --Finnboi11 (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

@Finnboi11: are you referring to Draft:Sleepy's in a Box? Elli (talk | contribs) 22:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2022

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2022. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Help with moving a draft to the main space

Hi Elli, I have reviewed this draft page Draft:Flashback (iKon EP) and want move it to an article, but a title with the same name already exists Flashback (iKon EP), which only has redirect information to another page. I was wondering how do I proceed here. Thanks and looking forward to your inputs —Bostonite01310 talk | contribs 03:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

UPDATE: I have now found a way to move it. The article is now published Flashback (iKon EP). Please review it when you get a chance. Thank you so much. —Bostonite01310 talk | contribs 16:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

@Bostonite01310: sorry I didn't get back to you earlier! Looks good to me but I don't know much about the reliability of some of the sources you cited, so I'll leave it up to someone else to review. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Sounds good, thank you. —Bostonite01310 talk | contribs 18:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Question from Cerulean Depths (19:39, 3 January 2023)

Hi Elli, there is an editor whose work isn't necessarily disruptive, but they tend to put nonsequitor alt-right troll catch phrases in their edit summaries (antisemitism, etc). How should this be approached? Thanks! --Cerulean Depths (talk) 19:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

@Cerulean Depths: I would warn them about it first and if they continue report them to WP:ANI as that sort of thing is disruptive. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
I warned them using a template. Thanks! Cerulean Depths (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Template:Automatic redirect categories

I've created a subtemplate for applying rcats except when they are present in the page, Template:Automatic redirect categories/applyRcat. Can you see any problems that this might cause?

Also, how do you think this template should handle printworthiness, by default and when a printworthy template is applied? — Qwerfjkltalk 05:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

@Qwerfjkl: I don't see any immediate concerns but I'd recommend testing it on a few pages before using it widely. Also, not sure. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
I've tested it with User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/applyRcat/testcase and User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/applyRcat/testcase2, might it should probably be tested more, as you say. — Qwerfjkltalk 03:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
@Qwerfjkl yeah. I last seriously worked on this over a year ago so I don't remember the details of how everything worked (and have been focusing on other areas now). Elli (talk | contribs) 04:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Question from Rehana Tabassam on User:Rehana Tabassan (23:47, 7 January 2023)

Hello How can publish changes permanently in an article in prominent people of Kasur --Rehana Tabassam (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Succession boxes

Wikipedia:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization/Guidelines lists the appropriate successions. These are all definitive successions, i.e. a specific title, honour, award ect. It does not include subjective lists such oldest people which are open to interpretation. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 02:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@DerbyCountyinNZ: I don't see how this is "open to interpretation"; there is only one oldest living person at any time. The succession box is clearly a useful navigational tool vs having to search around in the article's prose for the previous oldest living person and the next oldest living person. However, this isn't something I care deeply about so I'm not going to continue pushing for this. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
It's open because no-one can be absolutely sure who the oldest person is. Shigechyo Izumi was thought to be the oldest ever for over 20 years until that was found to be incorrect. These are also claimants to being the oldest person who have not (yet) been verified who might be verified later. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 03:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Sure, but our articles are confident enough to say that these people were the oldest living people and who came before and after them, so adding a navigation box is justified based on the article content. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your swift response to user talk page vandalism. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Question from Japormsz23 (13:24, 23 January 2023)

Hello, how can I move my sandbox to article? Thank you so much. --Japormsz23 (talk) 13:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Leadcite comment

Template:Leadcite comment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

CO2 Coalition

That article could do with some improvement, including some basic and properly verified facts (about the history, the founding, the role of people like Patrick Moore)--but really all I find is critical information (in reliable sources!), "balanced" only by PR pieces from the lobby... Drmies (talk) 15:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

@Drmies: for sure. Been meaning to rewrite/expand that article for a while but been procrastinating on it (it feels like the kinda article where I could spend a lot of time researching and not particularly fun to do so). Elli (talk | contribs) 16:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, I can see that. All that fighting, all the propaganda (that's well-documented, of course, so I'm not making any POV statements here) for a club that's actually barely notable. I wonder if they'd be noteworthy at all if it weren't for the Facebook stink, and if that is actually enough to make them notable. Drmies (talk) 16:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
The way I found out about them myself was from a particular billboard from the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Certainly seems like they do a bit of advertisement in the real world, though not so much to have a whole ton written about them. Kinda annoying place for an organization to be. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 March newsletter

So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
  • Germany FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
  • United States TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
  • Byzantine Empire Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included Berkelland LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, New England Trainsandotherthings, England Lee Vilenski, Indonesia Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, Washington (state) SounderBruce, Wales Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and Chicago PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elli/Archive_9&oldid=1147792182"