User talk:Dmarquard

Welcome!

Hello, Dmarquard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ... discospinster _talk 01:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chris Crocker - Mind In the Gutter (cover).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Crocker - Mind In the Gutter (cover).jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Chris Crocker - Mind In the Gutter (cover).jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Crocker - Mind In the Gutter (cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 04:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mind In the Gutter[edit]

I have nominated Mind In the Gutter, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind In the Gutter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 00:06, 19 October 2008 (UTC) —Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 00:06, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Chris Crocker - Mind In the Gutter (cover).jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Crocker - Mind In the Gutter (cover).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page V Factory has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Techman224^Talk 04:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article was recently moved and redirected incorrectly. The article should be "V Factory", not "VFactory". Dmarquard (talk) 21:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Dmarquard. You have new messages at NJGW's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NJGW (talk) 03:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Dmarquard. You have new messages at NJGW's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NJGW (talk) 03:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please only use peer reviewed journal articles for the Cannabis articles. That's the standard because of high levels of POV pushing in the past. NJGW (talk) 04:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cannabis[edit]

You are invited to join WikiProject Cannabis, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to Cannabis. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to the plant. The WikiProject Cannabis group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants.

Welcome! Glad to see you signed up. Please read the project's main page and talk page for more information. Please keep in mind that while many members are likely to be pro-cannabis, our goal is not to gear articles towards any particular point of view. We simply strive to improve as many cannabis-related articles as possible in an attempt to increase the subject's presence on Wikipedia. I look forward to your contributions! --Another Believer _(Talk) 00:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IIH[edit]

Please adhere to editing guidelines and do not reinsert disputed content until you have achieved consensus on the talk page. At the moment there are several reasons why your experiences with cannabis oils should not be mentioned, but I am open to a discussion on the article's talkpage. JFW | T@lk 23:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone has been reverted[edit]

This is the English-language Wikipedia. We respect all varieties of English usage; but in the case of an English topic such as this book, we use English spelling rather than American. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:34, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

For responding to my link formatting question on Talk:Roy Ashburn. Much appreciated! --Joe Decker (talk) 19:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! :) Dmarquard (talk) 02:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gray Powell article nominated for deletion[edit]

Nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gray Powell AkankshaG (talk) 00:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries at Christine O'Donnell[edit]

Please refrain from inserting negative unsourced statements into edit summaries like you did at Christine O'Donnell. I have removed the text of the edit summary per WP:CFRD. --Selket ^Talk 20:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Episodic Memory[edit]

Ah, now that I look at the sub-article, it does state exactly that. The clumsy insertion of the "dubious" statement should have been reverted whenever that was made. Thanks for fixing it and including the edit summary. --Habap (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for the edit man^^ My English isn't very good xD --Neo139 (talk) 03:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome! Aside from the grammar and spelling, your section was well written and in good context! Through Anonymous, WikiLeaks will prevail! Dmarquard (talk) 03:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I need a favor. Since you know English, I ask if you can read, copy-edit and correct my English in the lead of the Linkin Park discography article, please. I'm trying to make it featured list but the lead is the biggest issue. Thanks!--Neo139 (talk) 05:56, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done! It may still need a little bit of work as far as its redundancy, but it looks great otherwise. Great work! Dmarquard (talk) 15:11, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help!!!!!! You are right about redundancy. The second paragraph is like 'album name1'->sales, 'album name2'´->sales. And I'm not sure what else add xD--Neo139 (talk) 17:28, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I rewrote the whole Crimson Glory article, and I would be very grateful if you could copy-edit/correct my English as always.^^--Neo139 (talk) 08:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! Mike Restivo (talk) 05:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan Civil War talk page[edit]

Hey, I was looking through the talk page votes on the requested move and it looks like you voted without being logged in and thought it didn't go through and then logged in and re-posted your vote:

Strongly Support*. "Conflict" is a better description of this war. 24.74.146.253 (talk) 03:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Strongly Support*. "Conflict" is a better description of this war. Dmarquard (talk) 03:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Not sure if that was the case, but I thought I'd just pass it along, have a good one! 174.114.87.236 (talk) 19:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! Dmarquard (talk) 20:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ample sources on List of presidential trips made by Barack Obama talk page[edit]

Hello. I answered your question on the List of presidential trips made by Barack Obama talk page regarding the logic behind the ample sources. Orion 79.195.253.250 (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the constructive edits to the secret service scandal[edit]

finally i think there is a normal editor in wikipedia

cheers!

Wikipedia Takes Charlotte photo event[edit]

I'd like to encourage you to start a Charlotte page with the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes America#Event page wizard!--Pharos (talk) 13:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WHMCS[edit]

The article WHMCS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Read like an advertisement. One source only. Notability not asserted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf^(talk) 13:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bownessie[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bownessie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This was originally a redirection. I have made the appropriate changes. Dmarquard (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Chris Crocker (updated photo).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Chris Crocker (updated photo).jpg, which you've attributed to Chris Cunningham. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 04:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have emailed the submission letter complete with proof of the photo's release by Chris Cunningham. Dmarquard (talk) 04:29, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gah![edit]

Sorry for the confusion I had missed the T there, thanks for doing the article and getting things fixed =) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You got it. ;) Dmarquard (talk) 22:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ITN credit[edit]

On May 20 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2013 Moore tornado, which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

ThaddeusB (talk) 01:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While I was examining the article history to give the above credit, I noticed you performed a Copy and paste move. You likely didn't know any better, but doing so actually creates a copyright violation. As such, please ask an admin for help next time you encounter a page you can't move. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Music Mania[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Music Mania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STATic message me! 05:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Article Sandbox[edit]

Hey there Dmarquard. I am building the sandbox and keep getting stumped on my new references adding to the sandbox. Can you clarify the correct way of references for me? Nainsal (talk) 07:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are different formats for different types of sources, but in the interests of time, I usually just use <ref>urlHere</ref> Dmarquard (talk) 03:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request[edit]

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week[edit]

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for astounding work related to current events, and thus contributing to Wikipedia as a leading source for information. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Dmarquard for an Editor of the Week award. As an editor that focusses on current events, he created myRA the day it was announced in the State of the Union address and stimulated the involvement of many other WP editors, thereby creating a great example of why Wikipedia maintains a position as a leading Internet information source. 90% of his edits are to article space.```Buster Seven Talk

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Dmarquard

Blue Marble Image

Editor of the Week
for the week beginning March 9, 2014

A user with diversified interest and involvement in articles spanning the range from Popular music to Politics to Environmentalism

Recognized for

creating an article related to current events

Notable work(s)

MyRA

Nomination page

Thanks again for your efforts! Go Phightins! 17:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)j[reply]

Thanks so much! Dmarquard (talk) 07:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Should a separate article on the dried flowers and leaves variant of the Cannabis plant be made?[edit]

Talk:Cannabis (drug)#RFC: Should the section about the dried whole-flower-and-leaf preparation have its own article? If you have the time, would you please analyse my request, as you interested in our Cannabis project. Do you think there should be a separate section for this topic? მაLiphradicus Epicusთე 21:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TomorrowWorld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Cook[edit]

When I said to take it to Talk, the idea wasn't to add a couple of sentences to Talk and then restore the material, but to seek input from others about the appropriateness of the material. I started a topic at WP:BLPN, and another editor has already removed the material. You're welcome to comment at BLPN. The one thing you should not do is restore the material. That would be disruptive.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning[edit]

Please be aware of the three revert rule. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. You've already restored the "sex abuse scandal" language more than three times on Joshua Duggar. Please use the talk page to discuss the issue and reach consensus. If you can't reach a consensus there, you might try inviting additional participation from one or more of the noticeboards. Continuing to revert without reaching a consensus will result in you being blocked from editing. Dragons flight (talk) 02:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing the new WikiProject Cannabis![edit]

Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Cannabis! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 559 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in the subject of cannabis.

Browse the new WikiProject page
Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week : nominations needed![edit]

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Dmarquard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week seeking nominations (and a new facilitator)[edit]

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

In addition, the WikiProject is seeking a new facilitator/coordinator to handle the logistics of the award. Please contact L235 if you are interested in helping with the logistics of running the award in any capacity. Remove your name from here to unsubscribe from further EotW-related messages. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 300 South Tryon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 300 South Tryon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/300 South Tryon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NewYorkActuary (talk) 09:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dmarquard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alert[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 12:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dmarquard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dmarquard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Barrium" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Barrium. Since you had some involvement with the Barrium redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:40, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kanye[edit]

Hey nice addition to Kanye's article. I agree that antisemitism deserves its own section. However much of what was added was already covered in the "Controversies > General" subsection. So I suppressed your addition temporarily. My suggestion is to merge your addition with the text that was already there. Best regards. –Daveout(talk) 05:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October, 2022[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Daveout(talk) 05:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]