User talk:Mohammad Umar Ali

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Mohammad Umar Ali, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, assess and review articles, read the news, or find an open task. If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please add your username here. We hope you will join us! Chris Troutman (talk) 18:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mewar-Delhi Sultanate Wars has been accepted[edit]

Mewar-Delhi Sultanate Wars, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! I have also removed the orphan template as I have added incoming links to this article from other related articles. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Screenshot 2024-02-16 022441.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot 2024-02-16 022441.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Back to draft[edit]

The article you cr3eated is now at Draft:Delhi Sultanate–Mewar conflicts. David notMD (talk) 12:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback notice[edit]

Hello, Mohammad Umar Ali. You have new messages at The Herald's talk page.
Message added 03:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New map at Mewar Delhi Sultanate wars[edit]

Hi@Mohammad Umar Ali You can use this map for the territories of Rana Sanga in Mewar Delhi Sultanate Wars and source for it is provided too.https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IMG-20240229-WA0003.png Rawn3012 (talk) 15:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image, have used it in my article. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Delhi Sultanate–Mewar conflicts has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Delhi Sultanate–Mewar conflicts. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help to block a vandal/spammer who has been sufficiently warned[edit]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I’ve read the Wikipedia:Request for administration attention page and understood that I need to approach an administrator. I’d like to bring to light a long-standing issue I’ve been encountering. I’ve been experiencing an issue with a Wikipedia user named DeepstoneV. This user has been undoing my edits, as well as those of other users, across multiple articles without providing valid justifications or reliable sources. This behavior is evident on his talk page, which contains numerous warnings. One specific example is the article ‘List of Sultans of Malwa Sultanate’. A user added information to this article, supported by reliable sources in accordance with WP:RS, and even quoted the information directly from the sources. However, DeepstoneV removed this information several days later. I discovered this today and this is clearly vandalism. Now even if I want to undo this edit, system advises me to do it manually, but this is time-consuming, especially when it involves multiple articles. This is not an isolated incident; DeepstoneV has been engaging in this behavior for several months now despite getting many block warnings on his talk page. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 07:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of complaint should be taken to WP:ANI. I have no opinion, though, on the merits of the allegations.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Mohammad Umar Ali! Your additions to Bajirao I have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't know that. I added the quotation since some wiki editors remove my content solely on the fact that I don't provide the quotation. So I added quotations besides all the info I mentioned in the article Bajirao I. Next time I won't do it anyways thnx for informing me about this. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 06:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Maratha Confederacy, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rahio 1234 09:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added information with reliable sources why are they being reverted? Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 09:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide WP:RS Rahio 1234 09:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided it on Maratha Empire talk page plz see it and reply there. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 09:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Maratha Confederacy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rahio 1234 11:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already gave the explanation on the talk page and cited WP:RS sources. I don't understand what's the problem. I have been over Wikipedia for long over 6 months and already familiar with most of the guidelines and norms. I request you to specify the exact problem you have regarding my edit else would have to take up the issue at WP:ANI Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 11:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See the previous topic Rahio 1234 11:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was about not quoting the entire text from a WP:RS source and writing that information in my own words. This is entirely different from that. Don't know what you are trying to say or just trying to harass me? Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 11:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See This discussion this administrators reviewed the protection Rahio 1234 11:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PadFoot2008 12:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What to resolve tell? He doesn't consider WP:RS sources WP:RS. What to do? Do you consider these (below) WP:RS sourced information?

1st source The Marathas New Cambridge history of India Vol2 Part 4 pg 138 mentions Maratha brief occupation of Punjab see the quote: After yet another Abdali invasion, the Marathas, under Nana Saheb’s brother, Ragunath Rao, and Malhar Rao Holkar, returned from Malwa and the Deccan in the campaigning season of 1757-58. A Maratha invasion of the Punjab followed, which coincided with the much more significant Sikh rebellion. The Maratha Punjab adventure was brief; the Ragunath Rao expedition left little administration behind, and the Sikhs successfully resisted any attempt to set up long-term Maratha authority. This clearly says Marathas briefly occupied Punjab and the exact limits can be inferred from my second source JL Mehta Advance study in History of India pg 234-237

My 2nd WP:RS source JL Mehta's Advance Study in Indian History pg 237 clearly says quoting; Thus nature did provide a golden opportunity to the Marathas to establish their sway over whole of Punjab and northwest India, upto Attock and Khyber pass, although the spell of their rule proved very shortlived. This clearly indicates Maratha Empire/Confederacy ruled till Khyber Pass.

3rd WP:RS source Pletcher, Kenneth (2010). The History of India pg 198 quoting; Thus in 1757 Ahmad Shah's son Timur, appointed governor of Punjab, was forced to retreat from Lahore to Peshawar under the force of attacks from Sikhs and Marathas.

4th WP:RS Source;The state at war in South Asia page 55; quoting: {{Tq|The Marathas attacked soon after and, with some help from the Sikhs, managed to capture Attock, Peshawar, and Multan between April and May 1758.}] SEE the word "CAPTURED"

Additional: The Marathas New Cambridge History of India Vol2 Part 4 states This is for Areal limit of the Empire/Confederacy (same source); Quoting: First, we shall look at the expanding areas controlled by the Marathas, and there were many. Maratha leaders pushed into Rajasthan, the area around Delhi, and on into the Punjab. They attacked Bundelkund and the borders of Uttar Pradesh. Further east, the Marathas attacked Orissa and the borders of Bengal and Bihar.

And Same book pg 138 states; quoting; This is the source for protectors of Delhi throne pg 138 here is the quotation: For the Marathas, probably the two most significant events of the whole chaotic period in Delhi were a treaty in 1752, which made them protector of the Mughal throne (and gave them the right to collect chauth in the Punjab), and the civil war of 1753, by which the Maratha nominee ended up on the Mughal throne. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 12:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:V and WP:RS Rahio 1234 12:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plz have a checkup of your brain from a doctor. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 13:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Timtrent. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "Plz have a checkup of your brain from a doctor." is entirely inappropriate. Behaviour like this must cease. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What to do I am citing reliable sources and he is constantly replying provide WP:RS sources. I request you to see his behavior too while I try to contribute to Wikipedia he disrupts it. Though I apologize for such a statement but check his behavior replying same comment every time while I quote sources. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to involve myself in your tennis match. Thank you for the apology for the insulting behaviour towards @Rahio1234. That should see that matter closed.

The first step in dispute resolution is the adult step of stopping the escalation of the dispute, followed by the second step of an immediate request to WP:DRN.

Please stop escalating it, and stop that immediately, and then make the simple request to resolve this with the help of others. If you do not I predict that you will be blocked from editing soon (0.95 probability).

Similarly @Rahio1234 please do not react to any perceived provocation. I suggest the WP:DRN approach to each of you, biased neither towards nor against either editor. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have already filed for WP:DRN. Thnx for your advice, I will not escalate the matter from my side. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You failed to notify the other parties. I have just done so on your behalf. It is important to read and to comply with all instructions at noticeboard pages 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sry for that I filed in hurry so didn't read the instructions properly. Thanks once again for your help. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 14:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I note the new request at WP:DRN. Now, please, await help. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, Mohammad Umar Ali: I'm already in doubt that this was really your second edit, and I see that you were editing through your proxy, without logging in, until that was blocked by Bbb23. That is not the kind of behavior that inspires confidence. Drmies (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah that was initially when I didn't make an account. After I made an account I have been editing through this account only you could check my recent past months edits. All the edits I do I cite sources and try to contribute to Wikipedia as much as I could. Initially I was not familiar with rules and norms of Wikipedia so I often was rude to other users so such action was taken against me not due to any edit war. I over time have learned from my mistakes after all I m only a human. But check my recent edits you would not find any flaw likely. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 14:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. PadFoot2008

AfC notification: Draft:List of wars between Kingdom of Mewar and the Delhi Sultanate has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of wars between Kingdom of Mewar and the Delhi Sultanate. Thanks! Ratnahastin (talk) 06:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]