User talk:Rahio1234

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to MapleStory: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Thank you for reverting some very problematic edits at Neolithodes brodiei and Neolithodes. I have removed the false positive report from ClueBot: it is usually very good but it does make mistakes. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse or feel free to ask me. Johnuniq (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Rahio1234 (talk) 12:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions[edit]

Hi, just an FYI that there's no need to tell a vandal their edits have been reverted if they've already been warned by somebody else for the edit. You may find these templates useful for warning users, or alternatively the Twinkle tool (automated). AbsoluteWissen (talk) 12:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True black hair is rare, It's estimated that only 2% possesses true black hair[edit]

It's unfair to add dark brown hair and true black hair into the same category as "black". Wish l (talk) 12:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Please read your talk page Rahio1234 (talk) 12:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rahio1234 reported by User:AlphaBetaGamma (Result: ). Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 11:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies Sorry, i don't make mistake anyway. Why did block my account? Rahio1234 (talk) 07:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please think before editing or writing a comment. Did you see the "Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion" section just above? The link they provided no longer goes to the right place but it should be pretty simple to find your user name and see what the problem was. Some thought regarding edits at A Thousand Times Repent would show that reverting an IP six times in under half an hour was not a good idea. Johnuniq (talk) 08:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq thank Rahio1234 (talk) 09:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I WAS REORGANIZING THE ARTICLE NOT VANDALIZING IT 91.152.225.81 (talk) 10:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide a reliable source. Rahio1234 (talk) 10:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then why did you remove all my added content? Surely some of my text was properly sourced even if you don’t think the official website of an organisation is “reliable”?? 2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (talk) 10:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you revert my edits this time??? 2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (talk) 12:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This a unreliable source Rahio1234 12:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BBC THE GUARDIAN AND REUTERS ARE UNRELIABLE?? 2001:999:700:8CDD:119B:CF66:E433:4D90 (talk) 12:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide WP:RS. Rahio1234 12:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted eight times in a little over an hour, and you didn't explain why--not a single time. Drmies (talk) 16:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Ok, Thank you Rahio1234 (talk) 08:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]