User talk:David Almond 1968

David Almond 1968, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi David Almond 1968! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Killick Martin & Company (March 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Remove image placeholders.

Review formatting. Please ask for advice at the Teahouse.

See Referencing for Beginners.

Please revise this draft with properly formatted references before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires references[edit]

You have added content to close to a dozen articles. In each instance you did not provide a citation. All of your additions have been reversed (by me and several other editors). Content may be true, but cannot be added to Wikipedia articles unless there are published sources cited. As noted on your declined draft, this will require understanding proper reference format. See Help:Referencing for beginners for guidance. In the table, none of the ship's names should be hyperlinked to the Bruzelius listing. Nor should there be any other hyperlinking within an article (allowed in External Links). David notMD (talk) 19:08, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks - I will continue working on the Killick article and remove the offending links. As to the other edits, I'm confused? I certainly added sources to the Roy of The Rovers section ( Mick Collins unauthorised biography) and the guitar information came from The Guitar and Amp Sourcebook by Mike Abbott which has been cited by other contributors? --David Almond 1968 (talk) 15:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi David Almond 1968! You created a thread called what are the green plus numbers on your contributions at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi David Almond 1968! You created a thread called What do I need to do regarding the formatting so tis article is acceptable? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Killick Martin & Company has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Killick Martin & Company. Thanks! Siddiqsazzad001 (talk) 12:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I'm confused? I have an external links section already (section 3). Should I move that in its entirety to the end of the article? Thanks, David --David Almond 1968 (talk) 13:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I think i now understand. I've removed the links from the main text (including wikipedia pages) and moved the external links to the end. Is this now OK? David --David Almond 1968 (talk) 14:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Killick Martin & Company (April 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Problems:

No inline sources.
External links do not obviously point to information that might verify any of the information in this article.
External links should be just that: external. If you want to link to other Wikipedia articles, use Wikilinks instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I've now removed all the links to other wiki pages. From the guidelines I now feel the remaining external links fulfil the desired criteria - if not, please let me know which ones don't - Thanks --David Almond 1968 (talk) 11:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC) @WikiDan61:[reply]

It's not clear what "desired criteria" you hope to fulfill by the external links you've included; they don't appear to have any obvious connection with Killick Martin & Company. And you still haven't provided any inline citations to verify any of the information you've provided. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Killick Martin & Company (April 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WikiDan61 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still no sources to verify notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added two notable sources - The Hing Kong History Museum and The National Maritime Museum in the reference section --David Almond 1968 (talk) 13:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've added three more sources showing how notable the company was and how important they are too historians, including referencing Benjamin Disraeli and the National Trust --David Almond 1968 (talk) 13:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any more I can do? Thanks --David Almond 1968 (talk) 13:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hi - any updates please? --David Almond 1968 (talk) 12:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Killick Martin & Company (April 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Added references do not sufficiently prove that this company has been the subject of significant coverage in independent media. Please read WP:N for a discussion of what significant coverage entails. Also, please read WP:REFB to understand how to properly insert references into the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - more independent references added, including recent pieces in the Journal of Commerce, The Red Duster (The BRM Navy) and BIFA. Additional material from the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, a court case from the National Archives, Artnet, and wreck site.eu. To avoid any commercial links I've left out any mention of auctions and the work of Montague Dawson (although they are extensive)

Please also note extra comments of the China Bird book --David Almond 1968 (talk) 15:38, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have my latest edits been considered yet? Thanks. --David Almond 1968 (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Hello, David Almond 1968, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Worldbruce (talk) 13:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Killick Martin & Company has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Killick Martin & Company. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 16:58, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I'm afraid I can't see any comment? David --David Almond 1968 (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Worldbruce - I've taken your comments on board (geddit) and will do some more work on this next week --David Almond 1968 (talk) 12:09, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruce - amendments done. How is it looking now? --David Almond 1968 (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - and news please --David Almond 1968 (talk) 09:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any news or feedback please!!! --David Almond 1968 (talk) 10:48, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Killick Martin & Company (September 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Blogs and The Daily Mail are not reliable sources, please read WP:REFB for help with correctly formatting your sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Killick Martin & Company, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Killick Martin & Company concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Killick Martin & Company, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]